Articles in Category “The 9th Age” 2,255

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

Our beta phase is finally over. Download The Ninth Age: Fantasy Battles, 2nd Edition now!

  • New

    On this week's episode of MGR we chat to Wildlings Fras and Martin on the most recent points update! Tune in to hear our ramblings on how we think the new points update has gone, what we think are the biggest changes and how they might change the AB rankings. We also talk briefly about Strivelyn Styrife III, our local Singles Tournament, and the Cardiff Open 2019.…ent-chat-with-martin-fras

    The Scottish 9th Age Facebook page for updates and news about forthcoming tournaments and events here

    And the Scottish 9th Age Twitter for pictures from battle reports, events etc.

    To get in touch with the podcast team and to submit questions for the show you can email us at

    8-) [Read More]
  • The XIII Legion marches to battle! As you get 0 (compared to 2 when tabletop and 3 when painted with care) points if you brought any unpainted model, I still had to paint quite some models. Also harpies and my third Reaper needed to be based, while the Altar and Krakens had to be prepared after last battle. I managed to paint the WIP Prince, Harpies, third Reaper, and start repainting the Spartan command models.

    This is the list:

    Dread Elves
    470 - Prince (General), Nabh, Great Weapon (Death's Kiss), Heavy Armour (Seal of the Republic), Ring of Shadows
    530 - 30 Spartans, Nabh, Spears, Full Command, Acadamy Banner
    460 - 25 Spartans, Nabh, Spears, Full Command, Academy Banner
    180 - 10 Corsairs, Nabh, Paired Weapons
    380 - Divine Altar, Paired Weapons
    135 - 5 Harpies
    135 - 5 Harpies
    180 - Dread Reaper
    180 - Dread Reaper
    180 - Dread Reaper
    390 - Kraken
    390 - Kraken
    390 - Kraken

    Total: 4000

    Army Shots

    The XIII Legion

    Lord Drakon himself

    2 x 5 WIP Harpies

    The Spartans + Altar

    The artillery carried to position by raptors

    Army from behind

    Corsair + Spartan Cloaks
    [Read More]
  • Storyline wrote:

    A mighty roar awakened the Dread Elf legion, and before the forces could be mustered, battle cries were shouted loudly from afar. A thunderous horde of Ogre Khans was charging their camp!

    Drakon gave his orders quickly yet determined; "Zlatan, hide your Corsairs behind that temple and attack them from behind, buy us some time!". Khaled had no need for instructions and herded the Krakens towards a forest at the right flank. Good, Drakon thought, we funnel them into the Spartans deadly spears and charge them from the flanks, planning his favourite tactic: the double envelopment.

    "SPARTANS!" he shouted with his loud voice: "This is where we stand, this is where THEY die!" while he observed how Khaled unleashed the Krakens. With a wicked smile, he waited...

    Two weeks ago I attended my first tournament with the Spartans. This was the second battle, after the first battle only came to two rounds and ended in a draw. I had to play against full combat Ogres, so it was going to be an interesting and deadly match!

    Friendly list

    I brought:

    Lord Drakon wrote:

    Lord Drakon - Cult Priest, Nabh
    Khaled the Collector - Captain, Battle Standard, Manticore, LHAS, Talisman of Shielding, Beastmaster's Lash
    Zlatan - Captain, Fleet Commander, Pegasus, LHAS, Death Cheater
    Princip - Assassin, Bloody Murder, Paired Weapons, Bloodroot, Midnight Cloak
    30 Spartans, Spears, S, Academy Banner
    29 Spartans, Spears, S, Academy Banner
    10 Corsairs, Vanguard
    10 Harpies
    9 Harpies
    Divine Altar, Paired Weapons

    The Spartan list had evolved with the Krakens + Beastmaster, with the 2 x 10 harpies that contribute to the PULL of this list. It has no magic and no shooting, but lots of interesting characters, extremely deadly Spartan legionnaires and large terrifying Krakens. It is a powerplay list, able to rush the enemy lines, or hold certain objectives, and overwhelm the enemy.

    Enemy list
    The enemy brought:

    Ogre Kingdoms wrote:

    Unfortunately, I do not remember his exact anymore, I will ask for it next battles and take pictures so I can share it here for better understanding of his units. It had 3 large units of the Tusker cavarly that would have impact hits on the charge, the same counted for the Rock Aurochs and to lesser extent also the Tribesmen. He had some shooting on the characters which had no effect on the game, other than that no ranged attacks. It's list had quite some scoring and could likely do one thing very well: get into the enemy quick and overrun those positions!

    Pre-game thoughts

    When I saw the Ogre list at the beginning of the tournament I actually hoped to face him, as I had a lot of tools to defeat his list with the Krakens and the deadly Spartans with an multi-wouding assassin. The idea would be simple yet effective: delay parts of his forces so he came in waves, waves that could be received by the Spartans and killed by counter-charges or the Krakens.

    We rolled for Frontline Clash, and Breakthrough.

    While the enemy had the advantage with scoring and speed, I could defeat him in combat when he would be unable to surround me or attack the Spartans in the flanks. He chose the opposite site of the board, and it gave me excellent options to use the TRAP: the double envelopment. With vanguarding corsairs hiding behind the impassable terrain, they could launch the fleet commander into the flank or rear of the enemy forces, while able to get into the enemy deployment zone fast. He had to split his forces to attack, so if I could delay part of those forces with my harpies and have a counter-attack ready, I could take him out one by one.


    I started deploying with my Harpies behind the large rock, then the Corsairs, afterwards the Altar, Spartans and Krakens. The Spartan flank could be naturally guarded by the rock, giving me a strong defensive position. The enemy responded with a central deployment to get to me as soon as possible. My corsairs could sneak into the enemy zone as soon as possible, while Krakens could oppose one unit of Tusker cavarly united.

    I win the roll for vanguards and the Corsairs get 12" forward.

    Turn 1 - Ogre Kingdoms

    Here we go! No magic and shooting in this game, so it will likely become a short one. Enemy charges forward without risking counter-charges.

    Turn 1 - XIII Legion

    I respond with by placing the Harpies in front of the enemy Tusker units I want to delay and counter-charge next turn, and move my units into position. Especially the Krakens move up for a counter-charge, while the Fleet Commander gets line of sight to enemy forces.

    Turn 2[Read More]
  • Good evening! An episode with a lot of news, but a rather short main topic about the frequency and scale of the Patch Updates.

    Hobby Spotlight:
    Bases for warmachines (bases 3D-printed and by Games Workshop, miniatures on the bases by Games Workshop).

    Norba Miniatures:

    Old School Miniatures

    Daemon Legions patch update:…ew-update-daemon-legions/

    Issue 18 of The 9th Scroll:…-the-9th-scroll-issue-18/

    Shieldwolf Miniature poll:

    Cheers! [Read More]
  • Hello all!

    It gives me great joy to pass on the information that the Avras campaign will continue on! Yippee! And to celebrate I thought i'd put all my battle reports detailing the "Journey to Avras" with Darius and his troops. This series of reports follows Darius and co, as they get prepared to go to save their beloved Queen. However, they have to overcome several challenges/obstacles on the way so the road is not as simple as they would have hoped...

    :popcorn: Enjoy! :popcorn: [Read More]
  • First I want to appologize, for being late with this article. I originally wanted it to be ready when the first part of the update hits. Well, that did not work as intended. The good thing is, that now I should know what interests you most about the 2019 update.

    So what info will you get in this blog article?
    • The goals of this update and how the update was prepared and done
    • The future of the update and what you can do to improve it

    • The goals of this update and how the update was prepared and done

      The update had several different goals, I'm going to walk you through each goal seperateyly. Basically the update targeted 3 things treated with equal importance:

    • Improving external balance
    • Improving internal Balance
    • Bringing in line to strong designs for which pricing could not be used as a solution as it would cause to much collatteral damage

    • Improving external balance

      For that of course one needs to know where an army stands. As written in this Announcement we did collect data from multiple sources. Primary datasources were surveys (to both open community and a group of top tournamentplayers) and tournament data (single and team seperated).Than the ranking those datasets gave tot he armies were compared. If they didplace an army in the same area (= only did differentate about 1 -2 places), Thescources were calculated together giving the single data the highest value.After that with different weightenings oft he datascources and other methodesthe rest oft he armies were placed.That of course means, that none oft he scources will rank the armies total identical with the final tier list. If for example single data would put Army Asomewhere in the lower middle oft he pack, but External Experts, Community andTeam tournament data puts it on the last spot, than 3 scources vs 1 scourcemake it likely that the one scource might show the army potentially as a bitstronger than it really is. (The width oft he corridors the armyperformancedata puts the armies, makes that also a possibility). But more on the topic of theexternal performace tourney data at a later time (=around when the final updatehits or around december, which ever is nearer to me finishing that report.Basically to improve the external balance things should get cheaper and others more expensive. Tie 1 should get more rises in total on current builds (even after taking internal balance into account), than tier 5 (where rises on things would beinternal motivated and be much less, than if the same army would be Tier 2-4.)

    • Improving internal Balance

      You hopefully all have seen and contributed to your armies survey and the armylist analyse threads in the armyboards. A link to those threads can be found here. In those threads armylists from both, single and team tournaments of various size were entered in TA’s files and then automatically analyzed. This analysis is for you to see in each thread in one of the first three posts.

      Let me give you an example of how the internal balance adjustion works so far. Through data analysis, EE Reports and the Community surveys every entry gets a grade between 1 (hardcore seriously too point efficient) and 6 (hardcore serious too point inefficient). Then those grades are combined into a final grade. For that the different info scources have been weighted accordingly. Afterwards according to the final grade a factor is used to either increase or decrease the price.

      Let us get more concrete on the armylist data site, as about that I can explain more than about the other factors.

      We decided to use the taken "once or more often per army" dataset, as the basis for our analyses. Basically we belive it models the unit usage more fairly for units which can be taken in different quantities and/or for different utilities. Of course there are things where the "total taken" dataset might produce more exact results. (Yes, you guess it right, next year we will very likely have found a way to combine the usage of both datasets in a way to get the best out of both).

      From that we got how often something has been used at least once and how often from that category (Core, Characters, Noncore + Noncharacters, faction specific items, unit/character- options) would have been expected to be taken on average. There are several possible models to use for that each with its own pro's and con's and ultimately influences on the result. For example one can calculate the average expected shield usage for a character with the option for shield and great weapon as shield or no shield, which results in dividing the number of how often that character has been taken at least once by 2 or one could say shield, great weapon or no shield and divide by 3. This is an area where we will review our macros if we still believe to have taken the right decision.

      Now, how often things which were taken "at least once" were compared with that average. Things being used 190%+ are totally hardcore more cost efficient than what we want them to be. So they are very
    [Read More]