Recent Activities

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • Mick Boe -

    Replied to the thread Ambushing and moving afterwards.

    Post
    Thank you for clearing that up. Good to know that my UD get to move after they pop up
  • DanT -

    Replied to the thread Dr Dan's dangerously different deceptive detachments.

    Post
    Quote from Grouchy Badger: “Are you a real doctor. ” Is this at all relevant or important here? Why are you even asking? Maybe go troll somewhere else?
  • Hebus -

    Liked marcema’s post in the thread Lists [TOURNAMENT LISTS].

    Like (Post)
    Quote from marcema: “Tournament in Copenhagen 12-13 Oktober, i am unfortunately the only SA player! (Hidden Content) Rest of the lists can be found HERE ” Managed to claim 5th place in a tournament in Copenhagen this weekend out of 46 players. Think…
  • DanT -

    Replied to the thread Why isn’t Parry just +3 Def?.

    Post
    Should e.g. deepwatch by hit on a 5+ by os4 troops? Should e.g. imperial guard with shields or DE infantry with shields or basic dwarfs with shields be hit on a 5+ by os3 troops? *shrug* I would say no to these.
  • Locklust -

    Posted the thread Lightning reflex.

    Thread
    Does lightning reflex stack. For example, I have 2 arcane engines that give everything within 6" lightning reflex, I also have a unit of IG with great weapons, I know lightning reflex removes the 0 agility, does the other then allow me to hit -…
  • Gerfaks -

    Liked nightovizard’s post in the thread Why isn’t Parry just +3 Def?.

    Like (Post)
    Why not just releasing beta rules as optional rulesets (just indicating rule changes over the core ones) for testing purposes? Sort of an official thing that is easy to acces by the players.
  • Gerfaks -

    Liked DanT’s post in the thread Why isn’t Parry just +3 Def?.

    Like (Post)
    The community should create a repository of ideas for 3.0. And rank them in order of importance and level of consensus.
  • Wesser -

    Replied to the thread SE Oct 2019 Beta update - Community Feedback.

    Post
    Did a Battle Report with patched SE :) One Treefather botching like crazy, the other being just 2 inches from killing half the enemy army by himself (as it was only a Barbarian Cowboy and a WDG Lord). Bladedancers are becoming really scary.... Wesser's
  • setrius -

    Liked Calisson’s post in the thread The Al-Qassar Sultanates.

    Like (Post)
    Quote from setrius: “I think I should be actualizate the army book ” Make sure to specify: .permission to pick from his personal works for non-profit (i.e. homebrew) T9A use.
  • Wesser -

    Replied to the thread Wesser's Battle Report Thread.

    Post
    We played Secure Target/Counterthrust with me forfeiting 1st turn in order to get deployment advantage. There were things about WDG like Shadowchaser Vanguard and Spiked Shield I wasn’t aware of, so it was still a learning experience. Bladedancer
  • Flavus -

    Replied to the thread SE Oct 2019 Beta update - Community Feedback.

    Post
    Nice discount for eagle mounts, but it is possible to add upgrade possibility to change base from 50x50 to 40x40? It is very hard to use character with 50x50 base with only one possible large cavalry unit (in our book), that have 40x40 base.
  • Inn0c -

    Liked jimmygrill’s post in the thread 2.1 Warriors of the Dark Gods.

    Like (Post)
    Quote from matrim: “Barb chief on flyibg chimera is getting interesting. It won't move mountains but at a reasonable price will get rid opponent chaff and heavy chaff. Be a flank harasser, WM hunter or chaff himself. On a separate note; Background…
  • Shako -

    Replied to the thread DL FAB 2.0 Questions and Answers.

    Post
    Quote from Laksen: “dont know if asked before but here goes. About the Scourges Rage ability, says I lose an attack if it gains a HP, how is that posible (to heal it I mean) ? Does the Dominion also arget the general him self of only the R&F? Does…
  • Duke Niemar -

    Liked kelvenmore’s post in the thread Why does the game need Core troops.

    Like (Post)
    I've been playing WHFB well before core was introduced and I can tell you armies still had their themes and feel even without core. I do remember when core was introduced and it was a blessing, not because it was a good design but because 5th Ed was so…
  • TEPO -

    Liked Palomita15’s post in the thread TOE Fuengirola.

    Like (Post)
    3º TOE Ciudad de Fuengirola (Freak Factory) TOE organizado por A.C. Freak Factory, en el municipio de Fuengirola (Málaga) durante los días 16 y 17 de Noviembre de 2019 Aforo: 8 equipos Lugar: Recinto Ferial de Fuengirola (Málaga) Localización:
  • GGH -

    Replied to the thread "Dont call me 'Damsel'".

    Post
    I absolutely love the idea with a Combat Damsel. I'm hoping the new AB gives some new background and ideas other than old he Bretonnia. Good work brainstorming like this! :thumbup:
  • Duke Niemar -

    Liked dan’s post in the thread Forum Consolidation.

    Like (Post)
    So I've had the feeling that these forums have grown quiet in recent months, however it seems that the number of users is always several hundred+ which should be decent enough for conversation to flow. Moreover, the feed of the last few posts on the main…
  • Clangeddin Silverbeard -

    Liked DeBelial’s post in the thread 2.1 Warriors of the Dark Gods.

    Like (Post)
    In Army Builder 2.2c they are there since friday.
  • Duke Niemar -

    Liked EBD’s post in the thread Why isn’t Parry just +3 Def?.

    Like (Post)
    Quote from Vamp87: “No one has mentioned that many armies would then have easy access to DS 10 characters which would be a bit ridiculous. I believe this was the main reason the RT decided not to change parry to a DS buff (prevent the making of uber…