Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 22.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • Yes - but the etc players are «blank» until etc deadline. so most interesting ones probably missing drive.google.com/open?id=1ylo9rFOAT41haygl_7TYZ9RR8nlStHaP

  • A warriors chosen lord with dragonfire gem, talisman of shielding and luck of the dark gods: Is the fireborn «destroyed» by the gift, @Eisenheinrich @Lagerlof ? Do you Get 2+ or 4+ against flaming attacks? Wording gift: Luck of the Dark Gods 60 pts The bearer’s model gains Aegis (+1, max. 4+). Regards,

  • [TOURNAMENT LISTS]

    Grayfox - - Saurian Ancients (SA)

    Post

    Great post, @2Cats1Tuna ! I agree with almost everything. I have played 30+ games last year with SA, trying to find that "allround list" that can stand up against UD and at the same time have a decent chance vs. everything else. Obviously you need flaming banners and binding scroll - but they are good vs. non-UD lists anyways IMO. My contribution: Cuatl lord: general, BSB, grasp of the immortal, wizard master, path of alchemy/divination, essence of a free mind, banner of the relentless company, …

  • Lamia count on court with reapers harvest and cursed medallion is pretty brutal. So is mino lord with king slayer and flayed hide

  • Dread Elves 2.0 Beta Armybook

    Grayfox - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    But can we at least agree that only bows - not x-bows - have volley fire, so (des)-information written here do not spread?

  • Nice that people like different things. Tells me the rules are in a very good place. I will keep on using the EH. Happy hunting

  • Wrath of god is such a great spell and you cannot have that without EH. And a sorc need a bunker etc, etc. So the math in not always 2+2=4

  • I have played EH many games lately. AS my only source of magic. Like him quite a lot. But I play msu barbarians/monsters where I dont need/want combat buffs, if I played larger blocks I would definitely need/want master evocation/alchemy. I normally choose 3/4 spells: wrath of god, hellfire, grave calls, marked for doom, depending on opposition. The key is indeed to threaten with 2 spells per phase. I did 69/100 in the english championships 3 weeks ago. EH was very important in 4/5 games, threat…

  • Thanks. Guess it was a loophole before errata. Rule «feels» correct now:)

  • Question about unit height @Lagerlof , quoting rulebook: «In case a unit contains a mix of different Heights the unit’s Height is the same as that of the largest fraction of its models. Likewise, a unit’s Type is the same as that of the largest fraction of its models. In case of a tie, the opponent chooses which fraction to use.» So, a DE altar or a VC court in the middle of standard size infantry... is this unit of standard height? Meaning... can you block this unit from line of sight from anot…

  • Paid for Kyrre Ovrebo - the norwegian crusader

  • Lack of VC in Masters

    Grayfox - - Vampire Covenant (VC)

    Post

    So I was player with third list. Game 1 vs. list 2 was 13-7 for me. Will post brief battle report/pictures on Facebook over the weekend, think wr are friends, @eggsPR ? Follow me on Facebook @Gray Fox

  • Lack of VC in Masters

    Grayfox - - Vampire Covenant (VC)

    Post

    Lists ?

  • DL FAB 2.0 rule feedback

    Grayfox - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    What are you saying? Do the Chaos warriors/sword masters Get 2 or 1 attack each? - Bad wording anyway, should be «models in enemy units in base contact gets -1 a»

  • Sorry if this had been asked before: Harbinger on great beast with iron husk - resilience 5 or 6?

  • V205 Discussion thread

    Grayfox - - Archive

    Post

    Thanks. But do you agree it should be written more clear in gold version? Three different persons say they read the wording now as a free wheel

  • V205 Discussion thread

    Grayfox - - Archive

    Post

    Quote from Grayfox: “about failed charges: • Wheel the unit until it is facing directly towards the Centre of its intended target or if it was destroyed, towards the final position of the Centre of the unit, or until it cannot Wheel anymore due to obstructions (whichever comes first). • Move the unit straightforward its move distance. RAW, it seems you Get that first wheel «for free» - then moving the highest D6. It this intended? If it is it should be marked in blue (although I only suspect it …

  • V205 Discussion thread

    Grayfox - - Archive

    Post

    about failed charges: • Wheel the unit until it is facing directly towards the Centre of its intended target or if it was destroyed, towards the final position of the Centre of the unit, or until it cannot Wheel anymore due to obstructions (whichever comes first). • Move the unit straightforward its move distance. RAW, it seems you Get that first wheel «for free» - then moving the highest D6. It this intended? If it is it should be marked in blue (although I only suspect it to be badly written)

  • Walls

    Grayfox - - Archive

    Post

    These two rules combined answer your last questions: «In order to Defend a Wall, more than half of a unit’s Front Facing must be in contact with it.» «Ignore the War Machine’s Facing, as it does not have any due to its round base.«

  • [TOURNAMENT LISTS]

    Grayfox - - Saurian Ancients (SA)

    Post

    I agree you can buy cheap and potent magic without Cuatl. Problem is, you still (at least often) need a bsb/general. The cuatl option can be a cheap character option overall, being both general and bsb. And your magic source, all for 600-850 points