Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 826.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • you are THE MAN!

  • Quote from AlexCat: “Formulas are available in my sheet. Can you look at them?How can shabties do what you have written for them? 24 attacks hitting on 4+ = 12 hits wounding on 4+ = 6 wounds and 4 after 5+ aegis. How come you got this uneven number? ” Alex can you do it without mirrored scale, I need to see the difference between the two. And if is possible how they do against armored units like chosen knights and frail knights. Thanks

  • RT is aiming to make arm 1 and 2 more impactfull on the game. Reducing such ap is one way to do it. We where asked to revision DL units ap in that regard and see what is possible to do. I trust RT that their decision is for the good of the game and we will see a common trend in next books.

  • Quote from DanT: “Quote from AlexCat: “Pretty demanding tone, @DanT. Even if this strategic desicion was made somewhere in the inner circles, why do you think it has to be announced to the public ASAP? Why do you think DL ACS is responsible for that? Welcome to the world of the normal citizens who know nothing ” No, you misunderstand.I have no issue with the answer being "the project will clarify this next month, you will have to wait" I am saying that if ACSes give information, it should be pre…

  • Quote from DanT: “Quote from IoRi78: “For all. Dan you can ask fjugin or blonde beer if you need. Is something regarding the rework of the books. I think that them can give you all the explanation ” Isn't it the rest of your jobs to do stuff like that so they can get on with doing theirs?God knows they are already do enough. You are the one that are making the statement here, I just want to know how sure and precise/accurate your statement is. That isn't on them. ” if you want I can quote the ex…

  • For all. Dan you can ask fjugin or blonde beer if you need. Is something regarding the rework of the books. I think that them can give you all the explanation

  • Quote from DanT: “Quote from Rothulf: “Something to remember is that the goal of splitting the offensive characteristics in Strength / Armor penetration was to lower the overall AP. ” Interesting.Are you saying that there is a systematic plan for AP to be lowered in the LABs? Because there defo wasn't earlier this year. When did this change? Or is this another forum rumour? Quote from IoRi78: “RT want to bring the game in a position where light armours will be more relevant. So ap1/ap2 unit are …

  • Quote from AlexCat: “Quote from IoRi78: “Quote from AlexCat: “Quote from IoRi78: “hoarders will became too strong, is more likely to them to have more grind attacks than strenght. It will be difficult for them to have mirrored scale too. ” What? Become too strong if what? Str4AP0, str4AP0? Cant it be 'fixed with price"?And what is the problem seen with mirrored scales on them? If its possible, explain pls, I'm interested to know the reasons and would be glad if my input helps in any way possible…

  • Quote from john doc: “Higher AP than S for a lot of units is hardly an argument when most of these units are ap1 or ap2. It is also quite sensible in an army with low S (beasts, fiends, flies, serpents. Just compare with other monstrous units. ” RT want to bring the game in a position where light armours will be more relevant. So ap1/ap2 unit are seen as a " problem". Is a whole game idea, not only of this army and it will reflect on all books in time. Is for the good of the game in his whole.

  • Quote from AlexCat: “Quote from IoRi78: “hoarders will became too strong, is more likely to them to have more grind attacks than strenght. It will be difficult for them to have mirrored scale too. ” What? Become too strong if what? Str4AP0, str4AP0? Cant it be 'fixed with price"?And what is the problem seen with mirrored scales on them? If its possible, explain pls, I'm interested to know the reasons and would be glad if my input helps in any way possible. ” I'm talking of bringing them to S5 ap…

  • Quote from AlexCat: “Quote from IoRi78: “the number of units with more ap then strenght is like the twice in the book. The sub par units can be solved by price adjustment ” Then I propose the following unit to be stripped of AP in favour of Str: - Threshing Engine - Blazing Glories - Bloat Flies The reasoning is pretty obvious. What do you say, @IoRi78? ” is one of the things on the table (except flies) We have to be cautious to not go too on the other side and became too strong against light ar…

  • Quote from Dragus: “If AP is not a weakness of the army, I can't understand why is there so low AP values at so many units, except subpair units as files and glories, and the only true anti armour tool we have is a ST3 unit with lethal strike. The army as a whole has very hard time against some armoured opponents, specially those 1+/1+ cowboys (which are more frecuent than I would consider logical) ” the number of units with more ap then strenght is like the twice in the book. The sub par units …

  • Quote from Cam: “@IoRi78 @DanT Thought they had a weakness countering armour (such a myrmidons, or imps only affecting 1+ - 3+ for example) but I’ve clearly picked that up wrong? ” no absolutely. AP is not a weakness of the army. Arm is one.

  • Quote from Cam: “Not sure why S3 succubi daemons have AP1 when the army is supposed to have a weakness v armour, is there a fluff reason or is it just to up their power level? Not a snidey comment genuine question, before I get a snidey reply. ” the army have weakness in armour, no vs armour. Is a bit different

  • a Deceiver in the Arena

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    yes 1 to hit, after rerolls, will be done on the attacking model

  • We have to ask RT what they want to do with him.

  • Quote from john doc: “I'm sorry, I really hate to be a pain in the a$$ , but, since I am about to participate in a tournament, is it probable that there will be an update before the 6th of October? ” no

  • Quote from saldiven: “So, making them the same unit type as dogs, pigs, etc. is making them somehow alien. Sure. But, if y'all insist on making fixing a rules issue more difficult than it needs to be so that you can adhere to a decision about the fluff, go for it. ” this is how the project work, rule design is BG driven so this is a thing that could happen. I'm sorry that doesn't meet your expectations.

  • Quote from saldiven: “Quote from IoRi78: “Quote from DanT: “So here's the real billion dollar question: Is this a big enough problem to discard the freeze? The freeze that was asked for by many and promised by the project. The freeze that has caused many to pay for printed books. the freeze whose temporary suspension in one instance would open Pandora's box for depends of other "worth" changes. I am sure that DL players (by and large) will say it is big enough to discard the freeze. I wonder if …

  • Quote from dan: “Quote from IoRi78: “Dan, please, can you stop it? Is not funny and DL players now maybe are not old DL players, which where not guilty for a book done without playtest. So, if you have problem, take it in the appropriate space, or by PM with me.Thanks. ” Well it wasn't all that funny until you started reacting this way. Clearly I'm not being serious, which is in part because your expectations aren't serious: the ExB isn't going to unfreeze the rules just to change the Mino-lord …