Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 351.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • Wouhah... heroforge is crazy .. A bot expensibve but so cool. I have trye this for an inquisitor mounted : heroforge.com/load_config=5676486/

  • Quote from YeahGucciFrisur: “Quote from Casp: “You miss an artificier to boost the volley gun and be free to move away from your light infantry. Personnaly I would replace the imperial prince. By an artificier and some chaff. ” would be better, but less fun ” That right .. I am a nasty optimizer But then, if you want some fun. Why not at least give a mount to your Imperial prince like a griffon ? Mobility is cool

  • You miss an artificier to boost the volley gun and be free to move away from your light infantry. Personnaly I would replace the imperial prince. By an artificier and some chaff.

  • Well personnlay i often downlod the .zip When you dont know wich files have been updated since the last time you comes, its an easy way, to refresh all your files by one click.

  • Its difficult to be generic like that; You will not win in the same way against a gunline, that a cavalry death star, or an infantry + steam tank. So if i want to stay generic, One main weakness is our mobility, we often need to stay together to benefit synergie, that means stay grouped. arcane engine and altar, get a range of 6 and a adv move of 8 , this means you can never charge at more than 14, without loosing benefit from those chariot, steam tank move wih max 5D3, its random and slow etc..…

  • Maybe the all in one is into the .zip ? If its not, it could be a solution, to add it without create a new link that would add too much complexity. And anyway when there is an update to a book you need to update the .zip also, so not a big difference with the all in one. Except i beleive the .zip do not include errata in this purpose to be updated a more long time ? Where it seems all in one include errata.

  • Yeah quite interesting, Thanks for your work !!!! i agree with almots all statistic ouf ! ^^... Except one, i dont understand why so few people play the combo mantle of ulor + foresight on Ig with great weapon ? I have tested few times in big turnament event, the mantle make you won some game..for 25pts its cheap... Dont see any good reason to not be used more often.

  • Hum i am not in charge of this, but it seems to me a bit repetitive with the .zip file. So i think we should only keep one kind: the .zip or this all in one .pdf , both to gether would add too much complexity to the download page. Note that if you want to do it by yourself, lot of software allow to combine .pdf easily.

  • Good idea it could be added into the character mount light horse i think. And we can simply offer this light horse option to the inquisitor. I edit my post initial.

  • My lits (5200pts) for next week turnament: --- Characters 385 - Prelate, General, Great Weapon, Plate Armour, Imperial Seal (100), Locket of Sunna (70), Obsidian Rock (25) 325 - Great Tactician, Shield, Death Warrant (55), Blacksteel (45), Battle Standard Bearer 200 - Wizard, Wizard Adept, Alchemy 250 - Wizard, Wizard Adept, Magical Heirloom (50), Divination 135 - Artificer, Long Rifle (3+) + Imperial Armoury 135 - Artificer, Long Rifle (3+) + Imperial Armoury 225 - Prelate, Shield, Plate Armour…

  • Quote from greentide: “At least units of 6-15 should become cheaper to compete with the other core choices ” Well i wil never complain about such evolution

  • If i should guess i would say: Militia Knightly order Altar of battle Dragon Pegasus Inquisitor reiter with repeater gun reiter with lance mortar But i dont think point decrease is the real good solution for all of them. For exemple reiter with lance, are rare more because model are rare; inuisitor suffer internal competition into character. The patch system modifying only point cost, could reach his limit in some situation i think.

  • In fact our army is in my opinion already pretty cool. I don’t think there is lot of thing to change, even point cost modification should be light; and underused unit are most due to internal issue than cost issue. Now our army have one issue, its is flexibility. This is the consequence of synergie. If we want play at a pro level, we have to look for every small synergy, and optimize them at maximum. This is reducing the number of list possible. But synergie also impact flexibility during game, …

  • Is it me, or we see a lot more use of electoral cavalry those last time ^^. That a great news. especially as nothing change in point cost or rules

  • Love this list. I should test it. I am always a bit scary to play reiter they can be destroy easily. But maybe i am wrong.. And For sure they are so cool to play. Next time will try this. Quote from asari: “Here is a list I have done great with, I have 7-1 with atm and only lost a game cus I did gamble on my knights would be able to save stuff but ofc they cant 1 marshal bsb, pistol, halberd 175 1 wizard master, pyro, bidning scroll, light armour 410 1 artificer longrifle 135 1 prelate plate arm…

  • keep ig. Demi not really good. And se & vs will just eat them easily. Plays crying in them as soon you can to protect your ig

  • I agree with both of you. A priest BSB, would be a really poor design. When we do LAB i want our army to have a nice backgroudn and fluff. Unit and rules, should be story not only game effect. BSB is lot more logicial for a marshal. As are order. But in same time i agree with Gaius, that we have an issue of flexibility with our army, and BSB is one part of the issue. I will come back on this in a long topic. But maybe can we solve this flexibility issue, By other way ? The only exception when i …

  • Quote from DanT: “I think there is room to canvas the community and find out what is important to them about the lance formation. E.g. (A) The aesthetic (B) The specialness of getting their own formation (C) The static combat resolution (D) The steadfast breaking (E) The narrow width (F) etc etc ” I am not a real KoE player, as its not my main army... But for me answer (A) And i even regret the Old WHFB V4-5 formation. This was the best formation ever ! So cool. yes it was more complexe to deter…

  • Quote from greentide: “Just below average will probably mean price discounts on rarely used units. I don´t expect the double light infantry+ tank+ light council to get cheaper, but maybe cavalry, the inquisitor and our mounts. ” Reduce cavalry cost is difficult. Its should be cheaper for large cav unit, and maybe higher for small one. Or maybe even play with the minium model. Actually its 5, could be 8.. Or different for electoral and kinghtly order ? Because actually 165pts or 155pts for a 5 gu…

  • Show me what you call shooting list, they need to be extrem and fully synergized, not just 2 or 3 unit of light troops and a canon I have some pretty good result since a moment against almost any type of list, with my gunline. But strangly i dont influence anybody Now those kind of list arent the most fun to play. I have done a full gunline at IR 2018, was a nightmare for my opponent, they just try to save point. For 2019 i keep a gunline, but i add a bit more fighting unit into to get more funn…