Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 527.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • Honest answer, no I dont know if the current setup is robust enough. We will see though post DE and ID. Thats why we have control checks outside of the lab teams aswell.

  • Yes and yes.

  • Shall we all try to not bite Wessers head off, like he is a bat at the Ozzy Osborne concert? He isn't responsible for the change, and Im certain he will report any key issues like this. I dont think he will forget about it after the last few posts.

  • Quote from Arthur: “I was asking if someone consciously made the decision to allow it, or if it was just an oversight? You seem to be suggesting it was the latter? It would be a complete paradigm shift for T9A to allow 3 flying terror causing thunderstompers in the same army. That's why I'm asking ” A bit of both. We decided to let the data do the talking and not jump straight in with blocking new combos (for example I forsee a shift in how people will combine army special items and general spec…

  • We gave very good reviews to our fellow dutch after the previous one ;).

  • Cant wait for the event!

  • I personally feel that there is to much AP in the game, and I hope that in the future with the new FABS we will see more of a decrease in it (there is a lot of stuff that has more AP beyond strenght) so that the armour values of 4/5/6+ means a bit more than it does now.

  • Quote from Adam: “@cptcosmic that would only happen if armies were not adjusted to external balance. As far as I understand the process your "point fix budget" is based on external power, and then it is spent on unit entries using laws of supply and demand. So weaker armies get more and bigger buffs (but it might happen that some things there get minor nerfs as well) and the reverse is applied to stronger armies. ” Thats a pretty good summary in general for this update.

  • Quote from Cortrillion: “Do any of you read my walls of text? =) -Cort ” Usually I do, but to be honest my attention is needed somewhere else at the moment so Im bowing out of this discussion till all the updates are released.

  • He means the Engineer rule the Engineer has.

  • @lol.lobest Rule changes like that aren't in this update unfortunatly.

  • Quote from Cortrillion: “@Blonde Beer your list dos not sound OP to me. As you say, very RPS im sure combat heavy lists can really pull you under fast. My list the first on Here List almost 95% infantery. ” I agree. And play a different army pretty much at every event (asklander is my guilty pleasure for casual games) and Im used to people finding everything OP ;).

  • Quote from Cortrillion: “On a side note - I don’t think any of my opponents this week where of the opinion that my army was overpowered. They thought that there were elements that where strong and some that where weak. I did roll totally out the box with a small unit of berserkers and did 17 wounds with 15 atks on EoS infantery… But that was op rolling :). ” I use 3 units of Berserkers, and a big ambushing block with a choppy lord in Core. People... are not to happy about that showing up turn 2 …

  • Let see if some news attention helps :).

  • Since I got tagged in to this discussion... I dont believe that the aux books have to be tied to the main books after the original release but that they should mature on their own. (Keep in mind personal opinion). The design team and I had some discussion about this update to work on some of the more pressing problems but as Krokz pointed it out this is a very busy period. That shouldn't be an excuse for doing sloppy work but as someone who has been playing this army quite a bit I think the upda…

  • If my opponent forgets about it and blows away all his dispell dice and buffed his unit with magic (looking at you dwarfs) I might cast it.

  • Quote from Herminard: “What is your experience in this regard? ” Minimum blocks of 20~25. Yes they will usually die, or be weakened enough after a combat to be only really be used as scoring or chaff, but I find they usually do more than I expected on that single combat and it can be key to disrupt the enemies plan. I do play with quite a bit of support magic though.

  • Quote from Traumdieb: “What will you change in your list? ” Proparly just really finish my non shooty agressive seeker army. Most of the things I was toying with got cheaper, only need to rebuild the characters.

  • Quote from Herminard: “This is.. not at all what I ask. ” What I meant was having them do more than just fill in a questionaire but give their own written feedback about stuff. Like the example Furion linked.

  • Quote from Herminard: “@Blonde Beer - EE should probably be something more than just a questionnaire indeed ” I know, but Im streched quite thin at the moment. Its something that is on my mind though, but getting community feedback handled officially and related subjects for it was higher on my to do list. During the beta fase Ill see if I can add more to the EE work load.