Search Results

Quote from Ghiznuk: “Malal ” Actually he was an IP problem, if I recall rightly.

Quote from Grouchy Badger: “Quote from Manxol: “Even worse 3ek3w7.jpgvia Imgflip Meme Generator ” Illustration11.png” images

If the Infernal dwarfs exist and are spiritually different from the dwarfs of the DH, then you could easily have a third dwarf faction that is also spiritually different from the previous two. I say go forth with Kegiz Gavem!

Let me make myself clear. Any previous conversations of an unpleasant manner are now over. They are to stop. If anyone, for whatever reason, wants to continue to have such conversations; then they can take it to Private Message. Final Warning before I start giving out warning points.

Glad to hear.

Calm it down gents. Let's not let our tempers flare here.

Bah to all these suggestions. The clear true path is bring back the Ocean Borne! Bring in the feeeesh!

Quote from dan: “Please continue the discussion here: the-ninth-age.com/community/in…ies-playtesting-feedback/ @Emperor_Zoron, would you please lock this thread? ” You got it boss.

Quote from Grouchy Badger: “unknown.png” e74772030e1031b54d0c26bc1be98bd7.jpg

I still say we should playtest the book as Ed already had it first; before we even think of making any changes. Also, I don't think we need monstrous cavalry.

Quote from jaith1: “@EdSteiner Truthfully, it is a very complete work as it is. I doubt anyone could really find that many changes to it. So if we were to vote further, I would recommend it is play tested as is first (with your own 2.1 update as you deem fit). If anything, the only issues I could find might be units that would rarely see play in contrast to units that would always see play. ” I agree with this. ^ Let's see how his current book tests, before anyone else tries to change anything a…

@dan do you really think we should make a new thread, though? Or should we just put the vote here?

Guys, please keep it civil in here. Discussions need to be constructive and not inflammatory.

Quote from dan: “So I've been doing a lot of soul searching on this, because it's clear after almost two years that this joint effort isn't going anywhere. Moreover, even if something is ultimately completed, it's going to be such a product of compromise that it won't look anything like any of us view a mercenary faction. In short, everybody will be disappointed. I'd like to propose that we change tack completely. There are already a lot of great books written for mercenaries, and most of the wr…

I'd like to apologize. I left this project without much word, and that was very rude. I fear the project had left me disheartened, to the point that I just couldn't muster up the desire to continue contributing. Still I should have said something. For that I am very sorry. I do agree with Dan's idea and I'd be happy to make a poll for this new vote.

Quote from Skarloc: “Please move this thread from General Discussion to Dwarven Holds (DH) Duble Organ Gun and Duble engineer no more for DH... or even better if you can, inside this existing thread: DH 2.0 beta general discussion thread #2 ” Quote from Skarloc: “Please move this thread from General Discussion to Suggestions / Categories / Special Rules Why isn’t Parry just +3 Def? ” Done.

I think a number of individuals here need to take a break from their computers and go do something else... Or, at least, leave this thread alone for a bit.

Good stuff.

Quote from Grouchy Badger: “@imperialengineer 38x3ne.jpg ” 1449147038300.gif *cackles in bony undead*

How goes this project? Any news?