Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 306.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • The Oriflamme is not a bad item..fear = 1- Ld and no reroll from BsB. But then again vs. units immun to fear , it isn`t very usefull. I would like to see a automatic -1 to Leadership in addition .

  • Quote from DarkSky: “Quote from DanT: “Quote from Phosphorus: “Quote from DanT: “The one thing I'm sure of at this point is that there is no course of action RT can follow that won't result in significant criticism. ” Which mustn`t be bad per se. Depends on the quality of the criticism. ” Sure, I phrased it badly.I meant unreasonable and unconstructive criticism.As opposed to supportive feedback. ” So you think my feedback was unreasonable and unconstructive? ” Your questioning was sound (to me)…

  • My first thoughts (or ...rather impressions) By and large okayish.. Special itmes : fine. An additional 10 pts. for sunnas medaillon is fair (nothing which whould prefent me from still using it...we DO have a prob. with mighty über-characters..abd it is still my no. 1 solution for that.) Arcane Engine: I can see that the one with light. reflexes is a deal cheaper now..and why. The synergies with Arcane Shield is for us better , hence it is clearly the prefered one (and probably will be) . Light …

  • Changelog• Special Items: • Imperial Seal 105↘100 -5 • Blacksteel 50↘45 -5 • Locket of Sunna 70↗80 +10 Characters: • Knight Commander: –Base cost 190↘180 -10 –Young Griffon 35↗40 +5 • Prelate, Base cost 155↗160 +5 • Wizard, Arcane Engine 190↘185 -5 Character mounts: • Arcane Engine: –Arcane Shield 10↗15 +5 Core: • Electoral Cavalry: –Starting cost 150↗155 +5 –Additional models 26↘25 -1 –Shield 5↘4 -1 • Light Infantry: –Starting cost 125↗135 +10 –Additional models 15↘13 -2 • Heavy Infantry, Addit…

  • Quote from DanT: “The one thing I'm sure of at this point is that there is no course of action RT can follow that won't result in significant criticism. ” Which mustn`t be bad per se. Depends on the quality of the criticism.

  • Quote from tulmir: “I guess no one here has any problems with forests that suddenly appear from nowhere lol (by BH and SE). I am just brain-storming, come on guys. Maybe we can have a banner that allows our foot units to garrison the buildings? ” yeah, fine...but what for? If we arte brainstorming for the sake of brainstorming --well I put in pink unicorns -.again. Fluffy rainbow knights on pink unicorns !

  • combinations of some rather unlucky and lucky dice rolling. ...also the buff spell helped a deal I guess

  • Quote from greentide: “Exactly, without Imperial Guard. And that´s the whole point: By fielding Imperial Guard incl. characters and a big unit of knightley Orders, it´s a two threat rooster completely different from the above lists. griffons are fine, but even 5 of them don´t build that much pressure as the stubborn Imperial Guard star. They have less movement, but still can use orders and karadon´s courser works for them too. ” Oh, he trained for a tournament..wasn`t satisfied with the list and…

  • Quote from greentide: “I checked out all his lists, the nerd that I am xp Not a Single One had the combination of large cav bus+imperial Guard+stank. Most of his lists had rather Sun Griffons btw. So right now the infamous Grandmaster Flenz uses this list exclusively. Unless He has borrowed it from someone else.. ” Believe me, I played against the Knights-Bus with Grand Master/BsB/Prelate + Stank + Griffons+ Grandmaster + Inf. + Reiters + Arcane Wagon (without Mage though) ...later he changed it…

  • Quote from greentide: “At a tournament over here I saw a list in action which had both-the cavalry deathstar AND a Medium sized block of imperial guard with all juicy Charakters in It. No light infantry but some Reiters and ofc a steam Tank, the mage Master rocked alchemy. Only concession was picket+Titanic might on the knight commander instead of Sonnstahl. Will defo try that out myself one Day, because the double threat list is very tempting.. ” Bah, @YeahGucciFrisur did that down here already…

  • Quote from Kapten Kluns: “What if its not the Knights that needs to get better in combat while fighting with peasants. What if its not even the other way around?! What if the design goes and makes the dreaded phrase "just flank it" possible!? A unit of peasants are stubborn until the next friendly player turn if a unit of knights charged a combat that they were a part of. Knights are similar to now, similar with peasants. But you get this ingame synergy between the two. If the peasants bleed CR …

  • Quote from Mercenary Armies: “@Phosphorus your post inspired me this: EoS detachment add bonus rank up to 5 (6?). Maybe could be the same with peasant fighting alongside knight. By the way, infantry men with Off/Def 3 all my life ” Might be a alternative solution...in the end it would be up to the number crunches . And I don´t think that Of/def. 3 would change much (regarding the issue here). For me that would run against fluff (untrained peasants) and Off/Def. 3 wouldn`t do much ...vs. Off/def.…

  • Quote from Folomo: “@Phosphorus Would that mean that peasants with legión banner automatically draw or win all combats? It also invalidates all weapons aside from HW&S. I think reducing the CR levies generate to half is a much simpler and balanced rule than fully negating the CR from kills by and to peasants. It also means that the damage peasants do matters, which makes weapon choice much more interesting.e ” Err, no, it would just mean that such mechanic would be in place IF both a units of Kn…

  • Regarding the idea that peasants (speaking just about peasant levy units) don´t deliver to the combat results: why would it be (in which ways) too strong if actual losses and (inflicted) wounds wouldn`t count to the overall combat result? Let´s say e.g. that a enemy unit inflicts 7 wounds to a peasant levy unit (which inflicts 1 wounds back) , a knights unit involved inflicts 3 wounds and losses 1 knights in the process at current what would be 7+1 = 8 vs. 4 (3+1) ...Equitaniens loss by -4 ...bo…

  • Quote: “Mirdynn:Why IG with great weapons which is generally fiabilized by a cabalistic machine tax, have a higher price than shield + razor banner version? Data didn't support making great weapons cheaper simply. Their price sort of makes sense when you consider their interactions with all the buff stacking EoS can do (hatred, battle focus, lightning reflexes, fight in extra ranks). These get a higher value when combined with higher quality base attacks. Extra s6ap3 attacks from battle focus is…

  • Quote from piteglio: “Quote from Phosphorus: “Quote from Marcos24: “Plus I bet the new edition is going to be far more streamlined. AoS worked for them better than WHF did, it’s simpler and easier to get into, they’re not going to go back to a significantly more complex massive rulebook ” Yeah, I bet they have learned SOMEthing...if that OWW will be a rank n file system , they will make sure, that the entry is far lower then in 8th edition.(need fewer modells) and perhaps will have something lik…

  • Quote from Marcos24: “Plus I bet the new edition is going to be far more streamlined. AoS worked for them better than WHF did, it’s simpler and easier to get into, they’re not going to go back to a significantly more complex massive rulebook ” Yeah, I bet they have learned SOMEthing...if that OWW will be a rank n file system , they will make sure, that the entry is far lower then in 8th edition.(need fewer modells) and perhaps will have something like a starter-skirmish system as first step (you…

  • So, would this Old world Warhammer (OWW) snatch away gamers from The 9Age? (in greater numbers). That we can`t say for sure (depends on various variables e.g. how OWW would really look alike). But it is PLAUSIBLE that there IS the danger. of exactly that. I `ve seen it (a view times)...with every new edition WHF....at the end of each edition, quite a lot of gamers had stopped playing and tried other systems (even warmaster from GW)...but when the new editions came out, they came back to WHF (new…

  • Quote from Just_Flo: “Quote from Phosphorus: “Quote from Just_Flo: “Did we reach the question of belives? Well, I belive that my belive is not relevant regarding the topic discussed. ” C`mon, you are not fair here....we had lastly such an Discussion (over at warhammer-board.de) where "believe" was an issue., remember? It is more about "plausabilities" (which of cause often border on "believe"). Could you imagine how many things in science are decided because of plausabilities instead of "facts"/…

  • Quote from Just_Flo: “Quote from WhammeWhamme: “Quote from clorens: “that's what scares me the most, that the appearance of the classic units is completely changed until the spirit of the army is completely unrecognizable ” WDG and DL have been released. If a similar treatment for the other 14 books would scare you, be very afraid, because that's what going to happen, even if it does drive away the entire player base. Otherwise be chill and wait, because that's about all you can do. ” Well I gue…