Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 583.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • ID General Chat

    Dancaarkiiel - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    @Ilderoth Magic is generally avoided when measuring and talking about army/unit strength because it's not a reliable factor, especially when looking at the units alone. For example you look at survivability of some unit and don't take all the possible magic into the consideration because of that reason.

  • ID General Chat

    Dancaarkiiel - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from saint_barbara: “Could you please stop posting facts here.If we wanted logic and reason, we would let you know. Your posts are very disruptive vs the narrative from elf forums ” "Just cast a spell bro" DESTROYED with facts and logic :^)

  • ID General Chat

    Dancaarkiiel - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from SlaveToThePyre: “[...] I think that when the time comes, Elves need a rule that allow them to be hit with a -1 penalty against shooting for some damn fluff reason. That would cost in points of course. ” "Solves" the issue for ID that have absurd firepower, basically gimps any other shooting army. Some armies (if they are hitting on 5s) would have their ranged effectivness cut in half for no apparent reason. The easiest, and arguably the best solution, would be to modify ID shooting in…

  • Quote from pedrobedo: “Hi sorry if this has been asked before but I can't find it and after not playing games for a coupe of months I have forgotten the rule. When attacking with an item that does multi wounds v multi wound opponents after wounding how do I allocate wounds. e.g I wound 3 times with a d3 multi wound and roll a 4, 6 & a 2 causing 2 w, 3w and 1w. vs ogres with 3w each how would I allocate i.e do I have to roll all the dice separately so therefore causing 2w's then 3w's killing 1 og…

  • ID General Chat

    Dancaarkiiel - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from berti: “and what about an unbreakable R7 train? dishing out autohits Doesn´t cost more than the single charakter too. ” *looks at Tauro* (Hidden Content)

  • ID General Chat

    Dancaarkiiel - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from berti: “I don´t know your meta, but in my area dwarfes play some core shooters....1-2 units of 10-14 models. Doubt that they will be able to do much, taken that they hit on 4 or 5 (long range, handguns with accurate) [...] ” Don't forget about perma soft cover because of Bastion

  • ID General Chat

    Dancaarkiiel - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from berti: “Seems lucky with wounding on 5 and 6+aegis on seekers. I had them kill a unit of 21 tower guard in 2 rounds of shooting backed up with a bit magic. Sad thing was...I realy hoped magic would kill 1 model more because the single model in 2nd rank allowed the blunderbusses to double their hits in shooting phase. ” Literally chaff with vassals, spit at them for ez flammable tokens, cast one of your flaming spells (or just have banner) and 360 noscope poor redheads back into the pi…

  • ID General Chat

    Dancaarkiiel - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from Traumdieb: “[...] A S3 Ap0 is utterly poor. Vs. 20 dwarfs its 9.5 hits =3.16 wounds = 1.66 when dwarfs got 4+, 1.055 if 3+ While a Salamander is a much faster redirector with light troops, swiftstride that can also support a fight since it got 3 attacks ap1 and a stomp. While he manages at the same opponents 4.75 wounds that kill 3.08 with 4+ and 2.375 vs. 3+. I would rather compare it to a spearback which btw is also better btw. Forgot to add: I see much more Weapon Beasts (Spearback…

  • @Andyman Rerolls first, then final result. If final roll is a 1 or 2 - cast fails regardless of all modifiers.

  • ID General Chat

    Dancaarkiiel - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from Traumdieb: “[...] What also makes the bastion so broken is a crush attack with off 4 this is killing a 1+/1+ lord every fourth time with a single strike. ” Why this model has a Crush Attack on off 4, that can be further boosted with Lugar's Dice, is beyond me. As SA player you probably see where I'm coming from. From gameplay perspective it looks so out of place and goes against basic design of this unit - mobile shooting platform and bunker but it can one-shot up to 4HP models. Lmao?

  • Quote from Just_Flo: “D oyou have a link to all lists from that tourneys? ” Social Distancing on google doc.

  • Quote from Arturiki: “Can I stand and shoot while already engaged (i.e. flank or rear, so free front flank)? I can't find a denial anywhere, but it does not makes sense that a busy unit can still take its time for shooting. ” 7051f2f033.png

  • ID General Chat

    Dancaarkiiel - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from Villon: “Quote from Traumdieb: “What is simply to cheap: Infernal Bastion. To cheap. To many (currently you can play three of them since prophet on it does not reduce the access to the unit). Mayhaps not even as mount possible. No Mask of Ages. Disciples of Lugar ” I remember that was 0-2 Bastions max per army, i don't think that is intended to allow 3. ” Bastions actually are 0-2, regardless if they're character mount or not. c4907c04a2.png cd8083dac1.png

  • ID General Chat

    Dancaarkiiel - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from skipschnit: “That is a great point. I also think that in some cases the cost is also hard to pin down. If they are so industrialized and have the logistics to bring all the parts together, then maybe the price also reflects this. [...] ” Wouldn't make much sense since points exist for sole purpose of balancing everything. Making them "fluff driven" would defeat the reason for their existence in a first place.

  • Quote from HumanClay: “So this question is about Vermin Swarm and Tyrant using Shield with Net of Deception. Can you make it so that an enemy model with 1 attack get 0 instead using Net of Deception? It doesn't say "to a minimum of 1" on the item, but maybe there's a general rule in the rulebook that I've missed? ” There actually is Priority of Modifiers, page 17 rulebook: "Agility and Attack Value cannot be modified to lower than 1."

  • Quote from Traumdieb: “Fatal Folly vs. Born predator. Only the reroll counts for creating attacks correct? ” Correct. e96321800b.png

  • ID General Chat

    Dancaarkiiel - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from Peacemaker: “how do you get a miscast on 113, 111?I see a few other people liked your post so this must be true. I think I'm missing a rule somewhere. ” You're correct, you count only a single dice as 3, not all of them. 1a82000730.png IMO item is perfectly fine as it it, maybe even too expensive.

  • Quote from Traumdieb: “I agree with this. Biggest danger for the game will be in my view, when the old world should have good rules since this game will attract more players. At least for me I like the old styled books more than the new legendary books available and apart from ID book being much overpowered currently, I would rather play the old book further. ” Not once in their career GW has made good rules, not even close. Even today everything is faq/patched to hell and back, some units/armie…

  • Quote from marcema: “@Dancaarkiiel curious about your full list ” There you go: (Hidden Content) Put together real quick, would change some things (sentries pls) but works for now. Enjoyable to play since you can do something in each phase of the game. I would like to try evo on cuatl once again but cheap MR everywhere really puts me off.