Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 114.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is available! You can read all about it in the news.

  • As much as I like the over-the-top censoring, the Lexicon auto-linking can't handle special characters. Move it, Pitlitter? Move it, chedderbrains? Move it, looptail? Move it, Hulk-fodder? That one sounds rather... old world.

  • I'm partial to: "Move it, Cheddarbrains!" @lawgnome any last words? It was your name after all.

  • Lexicon testing: Move, *%#@ it! Black Friday Rush Never Liked that Guy Anyway Middle Management Looks like the first one doesn't work. We might have to edit the name slightly. Does anybody have any family friendly rat specific swear words?

  • AWSR 01: "Move, *%#@ it!" beat out "Make way for your betters" 12-8 AWSR 02: "Black Friday Rush" walked away from "The Mosh Pit" 11-7 AWSR 03: "Never Liked that Guy Anyway" kept its lead against "Half Life", 15-9 AWSR 04: "Middle Management" defeated "Call of the Swarm", 10-7 Tune in after the next preview for more silly naming! I'm working on the Lexicon Articles. Apparently they are subject to approval now...

  • Results so far: AWSR 01: "Make way for your betters" tied with "Move, *&#@ it!" with 7/27 votes each AWSR 02: "Black Friday Rush" with 8/23 votes, next is "The Most Pit" with 5 AWSR 03: "Never Liked that Guy" in the lead with 9/22, next is "Half Life" with 7 AWSR 04: "Middle Management" tied with "Call of the Swarm" with 6/23 votes each. I'll keep the polls open until Monday. Vote today!

  • Polls: AWSR 01 (movement rule) AWSR 02 (FIER/self hits rule) AWSR 03 (Half CR) AWSR 04 (Discipline rule) I'll keep these open for a week or so and then create some lexicon entries of the winners. (Assuming I still can do that...) EDIT: After seeing the first few votes, I just wanted to be clear: you can vote for multiple, please do so.

  • Thanks for providing suggestions everyone! Sadly (or characteristically?) there appears to be no consensus. As your tyrannical leader, I will pick some of my favorites and put together a poll.

  • VS LAB ASWR Silly Naming thread

  • Quote from ValourUnbound: “AWSR 01 [name pending] - Universal Rule Units consisting entirely of models with this rule unit may ignore friendly Standard Sized models during Advance, March, and Charge Moves, with the following conditions and restrictions: The moving unit's Front Facing can never overlap another units' Unit Boundary. At the end of the move the unit must follow the Unit Spacing Rule. At the end of the move, any unit that had its Unit Boundary overlap with another unit suffers one hi…

  • Quote from arwaker: “a) We still have an army general model with regular commanding presence 12"? Or is there a need for this at all? I fear the army general model could now be abused to operate outside the battleline to provide discipline to Hulks or gutterblades. ” While that is a possibility, I would like to put an idea in your head. What if the Tyrant-equivalent is not the rat with the highest Discipline in the book? What if having the best Di meant you had to sacrifice something. Combat abi…

  • Quote from lawgnome: “1) this rule is only on the units with the "more ranks = more FIER" rule. ” Maybe, maybe not, WIP Quote from lawgnome: “2) It makes a commanding presence bubble of its own. ” Yes. Quote from lawgnome: “3) If this unit has a higher discipline, it is spreading that discipline, allowing you to chain discipline down the line. ” Yes. Quote from lawgnome: “1) the units this rule is on have inherently low discipline values. ” Low compared to... goblins? Warriors? WIP. Quote from l…

  • Exactly correct

  • Standard bearers in the "meat and potatoes" r&f units will have the rule. I can't say much more than that.

  • Well here's a rule that will change things. Interesting discipline has always been a hallmark of VS and this book will be no different. See below! (Hidden Content) As you can see, only models with AWSR 02 will be affected by this rule. One of the internal names for the corresponding affiliation has been "military". Take that how you will. Rules wise I believe we have affiliated and.. not. Background-wise there are more affiliations but right now the rules just have the two options. As you can se…

  • The toys are not quite nailed down yet, so I will not be previewing those at this time. Don't worry, I still have interesting things. In fact, I will go write up something and run it up the flagpole right now.

  • I wanted to reveal this one next for a couple of reasons. One is that it ties into a future rule while the other is that some members of the community have accurately guessed/suggested this rule. (Hidden Content) This rule ties into the guideline below by allowing more models to be removed without necessarily losing combat automatically. This allows the overall army to have an overall lower eliteness without losing every combat. Guideline: (Hidden Content) Disclaimer: We as a team want to keep y…

  • Quote from zaleq: “ What do you mean? Use the big brother upgrade so you can use the hell pit model. ” Besides the base size issue mentioned by Dan, that assumes that I have an Abom model! I just started the conversion process for one a... year ago... but it's basically a chariot crewed by rats. Hardly acceptable as a Giant.

  • While you've been thinking about LAB previews, a new Giant supplement has been released! I've posted the rules below for convienience. nPHqfDx.png I personally don't have a model for this, so I'm not sure when I'll get a chance to try it out. Nevermind that I haven't laid a model to table since March I particularly like the Big Sneaker rule, even though I would probably only be able to use the Hard Target portion of the rule in an average game. Giants do attract quite a bit of attention, though …

  • Fluff for VS

    ValourUnbound - - The Vermin Swarm (VS)

    Post

    I believe that Eldan has a document with all of the fluff so far? It might be in his signature.