Recent Activities

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • SirVelinn -

    Replied to the thread Lack of Melee Enchantment Items.

    I have to say I am quite happy with the current book. I am actually winning games. And no casual games..I am talking about game versus team tournament players. As I already mentioned, I am not talking about autowins, here, you gotta move right. combine…
  • Palmu -

    Replied to the thread Workbench - picture your current WIP stuff.

    Damn, I forgot to keep up with the progress, but the chariots are done. Snapped a few quick pics of the Pharaoh, I'll try to get better ones into my Gallery later on.
  • I don’t know too much about 9th age lore, but I’ll give this a shot. I referred to the King of Equitaine as king x because I don’t know his name. Feel free to critique/suggest better ideas! Duke The vast land of Equitaine is divided into grand…
  • Smythen -

    Liked Damo’s post in the thread Historical function of 2 handed swords.

    Like (Post)
    I think also theres a big distinction between duels/small fights, vs pitched battles, which were very different situations, and some weapons excelled in some situations more than others. Personally I think that 2 handed swords would be worse than useful…
  • MrPieChee -

    Liked EdSteiner’s post in the thread Independent Mercenary States.

    Like (Post)
    I have been learning how to code for LaTeX and thanks to all of the staff whom gave me help/code concepts and feedback. Here is the LaTeX version of Mercenary States - LaTeX layout Thanks to all who have given me feedback and support. Enjoy
  • Spacegoblin -

    Liked Warboss_R'ok’s post in the thread WDG Army book discussion - 2.05 till... now.

    Like (Post)
    Quote from DanT: “Interesting. Are there not people here exactly asking for a more interesting movement game and bemoaning the loss of said movement game? ” Hellforged units from WDG shouldn't be avoiding the EoS deathstar, it should be the other way
  • Warboss_R'ok -

    Liked DanT’s post in the thread WDG Army book discussion - 2.05 till... now.

    Like (Post)
    Yeah, all those tactical plays got called avoidance in a different thread. And I was told that my interpretation was wrong. But a movement game (tactical battlefield control) and avoidance are difficult to disentangle for sure. But I don't think this…
  • Poxous -

    Replied to the thread Colonial Carnage Team Tournament.

    If you want to come but are unsure of a team I can put you on the Merc List..a rogues gallery of despots and thugs ready to join the carnage by forming a team with you!
  • matrim -

    Now follows Furion.

  • Signal to Noise Ratio -

    Liked Kathal’s post in the thread WDG book 2.0 discussion.

    Like (Post)
    Quote from DanT: “What is the thing that WotDG previously had that was a unique army trait or theme? ” If we go back to 1.0: - Being able to play any close combat style in one way or another. Wanted to play Cav centric list? Jep, gotcha (Knights…
  • Altao -

    Replied to the thread WDG Background & Fluff Discussion.

    Quote from Krokz: “How many other Wizards can have 1+ armor (on foot!) and 4 S5 AP3 attacks? Of course they exist, but WDG casters are surely among the top of their class in fighting ability. ” Say that looking at Soothsayer Primal Instinct, same Off as …
  • Scottish Knight -

    Replied to the thread WDG Background & Fluff Discussion.

    Quote from Altao: “Honestly it should be: Background can affect Rules & vice versa - Rules can also change parts of Background. ” There are effects which cross both ways. However, dumbing down the faction to mere physicality isn't going to happen.…