Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 605.

  • @Zangetsu9 c'est parce que tu te dis toujours qu'il doit bien y avoir un ogre quelque part avec 1 PV restant, ce qui somme toute équivaut a rester dans la logique de Warhammer ou les blessures sont attribuées. En vérité c'est plus anonyme que ça dans T9A: l'unité a subit un certain nombre de blessures depuis le début, qui sont suffisantes pour ne plus avoir qu'un certain nombre de figurines en état de combattre. Combien de ces guerriers sont vraiment indemnes dans le cas ou ils ont plusieurs PV,…

  • Il faut voir qu'a cause du concept de réserve de PV, on a jamais "un ogre à qui il reste 1 PV et les autres 3". Les blessures ne sont pas particulièrement sur un ogre ou un autre. Ce qu'on a c'est une réserve de PV que l'on marque pour indiquer quand est ce qu'on enlève la prochaine figurine. Du coup pas besoin de se demander si les blessures déjà infligées limitent la règle Blessure multiple. On multiplie les blessures non sauvegardées puis on enlève ce nombre au total de PV de la réserve. La s…

  • Quote from marsky: “Je ne sais pas si sa été déjà évoqué mais comment marche le roi sur porteur de bouclier (forteresse nain) au niveau des PVs, son type de troupe et son endurance? Pour l'artillerie de campagne, la rune d'ingenierie est elle de série sur toutes les machines? ” Comme toutes les montures, on prend la meilleure endurance et les meilleurs PV parmi le personnage et la monture. Quant au type de troupe, la règle est la suivante: - Si la monture est une bête de guerre, la figurine devi…

  • Dans la VO, les attaques toxiques "ont Force 3" et pas "ont toujours Force 3". Sinon ca serait A effectivement !

  • Le futur...

    Shlagrabak - - Général

    Post

    Il faut voir que le gros focus de la 2.0 c'est la refonte du livre de règle et de la magie, autrement dit le tronc commun à toutes les armées, pour terminer la vague de changements commencée en 1.2. La mise à jour à pour but de revoir ces règles en profondeur sachant qu'on veut obtenir un système stable pour plusieurs années (probablement entre deux et cinq ans) sur la base duquel la refonte des livres d'armées pourra se faire de façon intéressante. Le but est aussi de renforcer l'identité propr…

  • The war on content

    Shlagrabak - - General Discussion

    Post

    There are about 150 persons contributing to producing the books on one level or the other (not just designing the actual rules). To the above list you can add artists, lectors, rules reviewers, layout team members, internal playtesters, conceptual designers, community support staff, ... It's a slow process because we have a lot of things to check and particularly right now because we're just learning how to do it. It's difficult to coordinate a lot of people but it's also difficult to work when …

  • Quote from RATSMASSESMIETTES: “questions sur la catapulte vermin swarm: Catapult (4) Artillery Weapon with Range 12-48", Toxic Attacks, Magical Attacks si je loupe mon premier jet pour toucher, je relance et je deviens: a) Catapult (3) Artillery Weapon with Range 12-48", Toxic Attacks (Strengh 3 & AP (6)), Magical Attacks b) Catapult (3) Artillery Weapon with Range 12-48", Toxic Attacks (Strengh 2 & AP (6)), Magical Attacks c) Catapult (3) Artillery Weapon with Range 12-48", Strengh 2, Magical A…

  • T3.. Out of Order..

    Shlagrabak - - WWW Topics

    Post

    A platform that references table top tournaments. Probably the most popular one for west/central Europe. tabletoptournaments.net/about

  • Quote from Karadrass: “Salut à tous, Je reprends le jeu après 18 ans d'inactivité (et oui rien que ça!) et j'aimerais avoir quelques éclaircissements au sujet de "retirer les pertes". Dans l'exemple ci-joint mes flagellants infligent 11 blessures au pack de fières-cornes, le chef bestial étant en duel contre mon prélat, j'inflige 11 touches à la réserve de PV des fières-cornes. Dois-je retirer 11 fig ou seulement celles en contact avec mes flagellants, soit 6 fig, champion y compris. Et l’excéde…

  • Quote from Lagerlof: “@Shlagrabak You can argue about these sorts of things, my job here is done ” I think I've got enough of that already in the last few days. :p @Eisenheinrich do you wish to comment on this issue?

  • The war on content

    Shlagrabak - - General Discussion

    Post

    @Bugman I think Klexe meant "Any given path should benefit equally all armies that have access to it" not "all armies should have access to all paths".

  • Range discussion

    Shlagrabak - - Rules Questions & Answers

    Post

    You are shooting at targets within range <= this is the basic language originating from the notation, which I believe any native speaker would consider natural. If "Range" is 60" you are shooting at targets within 60". If "Range" is 12-60" you are shooting at targets within 12-60". Both are intuitive and grammatically correct. Now what happens when you halve values? You divide them by 2, you don't average them. If I have series of values that represent say the amount I have on my bank account ea…

  • The war on content

    Shlagrabak - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Pellegrim: “say I wanted a high quality print of a world map ” I don't see any problem with that. Quote from Pellegrim: “and a full art DH army book ” I think there is something against distributing our products in a modified version, because that can engage our legal responsibility (unlike distributing content that you have created yourself). I'm not very knowledgeable in law so trust the Legal Team over me of course. I'm assuming that you have images that you have the right to distr…

  • The war on content

    Shlagrabak - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Pellegrim: “Will there be a point where the T9A community can kickstart it's own projects? I'm asking cause it's obvious resources are a factor atm. ” Not sure what you mean exactly by kickstarting but as long as you are respecting the licence (in case you wish to make money or would like to distribute official T9A products otherwise) I think you are free to do as you like ! I think Homebrewed products are an awesome way to create and share content.

  • The war on content

    Shlagrabak - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Warboss_R'ok: “The price is that with every piece of content you cut, more Jonnys choose a different game entirely. "Use your imagination" doesn't sell models, get people hooked or excited. ” Then I'm sorry but I think embracing the logic of fireball to lightning bolt generates far too much content compared to what we can handle before exploding. If Johnny wants significantly more content but isn't willing to make the smallest intellectual step to contribute to his own game experience…

  • The war on content

    Shlagrabak - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Warboss_R'ok: “Better for whom? Better for little Jonny who is 8 years old and just wants a cool lightning bolt? ” When you ask the team to add one more path to the game, you are asking us to invest at least in these questions: Development: - How does this path adds to the strategical depth? I.e what is the unique experience it brings to the game mechanically to armies that have it. - How does this path contribute to more army uniqueness and flavour, and not essentially give more peop…

  • The war on content

    Shlagrabak - - General Discussion

    Post

    In my opinion by introducing a new damage path we are likely to fall in the eadbasher trap: introducing something that is too close to another existing content to stand out on its own for both to be successful and add depth to the mechanics of the game. Either pyromancy or electromancy would be slightly better and result in the other being rarely taken, and in waves of dissatisfied players asking us to take responsibility and fix what we've created. If you find a mechanic that is really innovati…

  • Range discussion

    Shlagrabak - - Rules Questions & Answers

    Post

    Quote from Kisscool: “Quote from Shlagrabak: “Quote from Kisscool: “Quote from Shlagrabak: “Quote from Kisscool: “Quote from Lagerlof: “It's half of maximum range, long range is over 30" ” Yes, but except if I miss something somewhere, it is not written this way in the rules. The word "maximum" is intended but not written, and a "range" can be understood different way.You have an example in the rules with this p9:Quote: “named "D6", with a range from 1 to 6. ” half the range of a D6 is 3.5, not …

  • Quote from Lagerlof: “Quote from Nicreap: “if Nosferatu takes fencer blades, are they WS 10, or 8, the -2ws penalty for the bloodline is unclear in when it is applied. If it is a change to the baseline stats I would say 10, if it is a permanent -2ws penalty, the order of modifiers would suggest ws8 @Lagerlof ” Hmm. Good question. @Shlagrabak Would you say he has -2 WS on profile? Or a "debuff" of -2 WS during the game? Profile feels more logical. So he would be 10 with the blades ” The current w…

  • Quote from Ghurneth: “Salut à tous J'ai un gros doute, pour les nains infernaux. Lorsqu'on upgrade un prophète en ingénieur, doit-on compter l'ensemble des points du personnage dans la catégorie barrage ou seulement les 180 pts de l'option ingénieur ? Merci d'avance et désolé si la question à déjà été posé. ” Salut ! On compte seulement les 180.