Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 209.

  • Quote from Xeonic: “Quote from Warboss_R'ok: “I am confused. Why are exalted heralds popular? 800 points for a max level 3 wizard that cannot really do much damage in combat, and also cannot hide in a unit. Really??? For 865 points you can have a LEVEL 4 wizard on a dragon who knows 1 more spell and who can crush a whole unit in combat. What am I missing? ” I find EH interesting based on the manifestations alone. Being able to pick what suits best against a list in the magic phase sounds really …

  • Quote from Krokz: “Core Warriors are nothing special, I loose them in most of my games so I rather avoid combat. Chosens on the other hand ... that point of Weapon skill is godly. ” Colour me nostalgic, but I miss the good ol' days when warriors were scary and nobody would dare call them "armoured turds". Happened to me the other day... Some jester even told me to paint them all brown for better WYSIWYG! I laughed so hard that I farted. Warriors deserve a better fate. They were iconic, the space…

  • Yo quiero hacer un llamamiento a la prudencia. Todas las pasadas actualizaciones del libro iban a ser la bomba y a solucionar muchas cagadas... Que nadie se emocione demasiado. Lo que reportan los community support es una cosa y lo que luego sale por la trituradora del RT es otra.

  • Quote from lawgnome: “Quote from Qwerty: “Quote from Krokz: “Quote from F.Caccia: “Only issue is that the community doesn't seem very happy with what you've given them, so... ” I am also not happy with the pricing. As I said, we ADT agree that its pricing that must fix grinding aspect of the book. ” Pricing will achieve little. Low model count + extra supp attack rule + weak discipline is what makes favoured models bad at grinding. It is a flawed design. ” I think you have this backwards. Pricin…

  • Feedback report

    Qwerty - - Warriors of the Dark Gods (WDG)

    Post

    Quote from Gustenpjevs: “I'll do a read up on the alternative army. I have had too much on my plate to get that done. Sorry for that @Qwerty ” Hakuna matata. As I said, it is not a compendium of suggestions but a flavour patch meant for friendly/casual games.

  • Quote from Krokz: “Quote from F.Caccia: “Only issue is that the community doesn't seem very happy with what you've given them, so... ” I am also not happy with the pricing. As I said, we ADT agree that its pricing that must fix grinding aspect of the book. ” Pricing will achieve little. Low model count + extra supp attack rule + weak discipline is what makes favoured models bad at grinding. It is a flawed design.

  • Tengo que darle la razon a @TH3_PUNISHER en una cosa: nos quitaron chucherias antes del rediseño que nos han vuelto a meter por otro lado como si fuesen material nuevo, siempre a costa de algo. El ataque de apoyo adicional por ejemplo, no es otra cosa que la regla de Inspirar Grandeza que tenían los señores y heraldos antes de la 1.2. No estaba op, se podia combinar con marcas, nadie se quejó... pero la quitaron porque las sinergias eran una "Army Weakness" (falso, solo hay que mirar los resulta…

  • Quote from Krokz: “Quote from Qwerty: “but we can't have 3+ infantry (without shields)? ” I go into frenzy looking at KoE Bastard sword and why can they wield Great Weapon together with a Shield ... ” The answer is obvious, monsieur: only a bastard can wield such an ignoble weapon!

  • Quote from Gustenpjevs: “Quote from Qwerty: “Quote from Gustenpjevs: “Don't cut me in half for suggesting this. What would you guys think about decreasing plate to heavy armour on warrior foot sluggers for a decrease in price and maybe max 30 models in a unit? (Just brainstorming ideas) ” Heresy! They already lost marks and initiative, let their amour alone, please. Can we buff something for a change? ” seemed like an obviois question since people here agree that armor is a bad attribute to spen…

  • Quote from Gustenpjevs: “Don't cut me in half for suggesting this. What would you guys think about decreasing plate to heavy armour on warrior foot sluggers for a decrease in price and maybe max 30 models in a unit? (Just brainstorming ideas) ” Heresy! They already lost marks and initiative, let their amour alone, please. Can we buff something for a change?

  • Just popping out to thank the ACS team for the nice report. Good job gentlemen! Now let's hope that The Nerfed Age is over and a new age full of wonders is about to begin. Hear me out 9th Age rulers! I dare you to come out of your Swedish Comp castles and show that you can make fun army books too . Comping is for uppity mortals... you are creators now!

  • Quote from Giladis: “Quote from rolan: “How does this vote translate to "hard weakness" for anybody? ” By choice of the designers. As stated in the poll the results were meant to be used as guidelines to create the ASAW. ” A terrible decission if you ask me. Synergies and combos are part of what makes wargames fun to play. An army book made of independent units which do not interact at all with each other, is bound to get boring after a few games. T9A is going to learn that the hard way, but may…

  • Quote from Kharneth: “Quote from Qwerty: “Quote from F.Caccia: “All the favours need complete rewriting. As it stands now, it's basically: Sloth on chariot heroes, Pride on everything you can, Wrath and Envy maybe sometimes, if you feel like experimenting. Clearly not a successful design. ” That will be hard, too many people involved. As long as we share favours with demons, I fear that changes will be few and trivial. ” I know that is something from the design team, not from you @Qwerty. But it…

  • Quote from F.Caccia: “All the favours need complete rewriting. As it stands now, it's basically: Sloth on chariot heroes, Pride on everything you can, Wrath and Envy maybe sometimes, if you feel like experimenting. Clearly not a successful design. ” That will be hard, too many people involved. As long as we share favours with demons, I fear that changes will be few and trivial.

  • Do we even know if the guys in charge are open to giving "marks" back to knights and warriors? We could all be throwing our suggestions straight into the trash bin.

  • @Spacegoblin & @Gustenpjevs Let's not create problems out of thin air. The banner could be something that favoured warriors carry around to distinguish themselves from their lesser comrades. In fact, it is a better solution than plain favour upgrades, since banners can be visually represented.

  • Quote from Adam: “@Feynn on the other hand chosen lord with entropic aura just eats them raw ” but entropic aura can only be taken by standard size lords, so 3w and 1+/5+ at best if ridding a horse. Good to kill hero-level characters but that's it.

  • Quote from Grimbold Blackhammer: “We're 160 pages in and, while there are some valid complaints in all of this, a significant amount of this is people just don't seem to want to change their playstyles. ” If they wanted different playstyles they would be playing a different army, don't you think? Quote from Grimbold Blackhammer: “- we have shooting. It's limited but it's pretty good! ” We clearly don't share standards! Quote from Grimbold Blackhammer: “- we don't have "bad" movement, we have ave…

  • Quote from DeBelial: “ The other way is to loosen ASAW weaknesses and give WDG Vanguard, Ambush and artillery back. ” That would be ideal. The reasoning behind not making wdg superior in melee was that other armies would not field full melee lists, as that would mean inta-lose vs us. Silly if you ask me, but it is something they just hardcoded in the system. Overall, shooting and magic play a secondary role in T9A, presumably because magic is quite random and shooting models require no skill. If…

  • The new fluff is ok. Not great but not bad either. The problem is that it has been wielded as a crude neanderthal weapon instead of as a crafting tool. The Powers that Be smacked the army with it till wdg became a sticky grey paste , then told the players to like it because every other alternative is worse. That is why some guys hate the new fluff regardless of its quality.