Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 335.

  • Core issues in 2.0

    Pinktaco - - Saurian Ancients (SA)

    Post

    Would be great to eventually have something completely different in core as well. Perhaps in the full overhaul, whenever that happens I've personally never had much trouble to fill out core or figuring out how to do it. It's just rather trivial tbh.

  • Pteradon Sentries - these guys are in conflict with other units. We have swarms for dedicated chaff and Skink Hunters / Cameleon Skinks that can also hunt warmachines. The only feat of the Pteradons is that they can fly, but they don't serve a dedicated role. Instead they try to fill multiple roles we already have covered (chaff / anti chaff / WM hunters). They probably need a full overhaul (along with Ramphodons, really). Also, the JG category is really crowded as it is, so anything in there re…

  • Master of Reality - needs a remake IMO. It takes up almost 3/4 of the total allowance for a limited viability. Could we not get something more interesting in the 60-80pts range?

  • Tree Frog Banner - poisoned attacks on skinks (CC) isn't hot. It's super bad. It's there to cater to the "skink only army" minority, however, even for those guys this is likely a dead item. Can we not get something like "Raptor Hide Banner" - the units gains swiftstride which will be available for even saurian warriors at a good price. We'd be able to get M5 swifty infantry units.

  • Obsidian Tesseract - honestly WTF guys. 35pts for a one time use OR spend +5pts and get Magical Heirloom from the BRB, or Talisman of the Void.. Comparedly Sceptre of Power allows a user to use an additiona power / dispel dice AFTER seeing the casting result. At least the tesseract isn't dominant though.

  • Glory of the Dawn Age - can this enchantment be allowed on more weapons?

  • Quote from Mikkel Aagaard: “Quote from Pinktaco: “Is there more to this other than this one message that appear to be more of an accident? ” what appears to be an accident? The mention of the shield and the banner, or are you refering to something else? ” Yes, the mentioning of those two items should have been left out IMO. It's too early to really tell much, except for the BLT to look further into things they were already uncertain of to begin with. @Axiem I didn't follow the creation of this a…

  • Is there more to this other than this one message that appear to be more of an accident?

  • Quote from Dancaarkiiel: “There actually is, without a doubt. :3 We have a saying here in Poland - "A spoonful of tar will spoil a barrel of honey", something along those lines anyway. It describes when something nearly perfect is disrupted by a tiny detail. I guess that's the case now. ” Back when I studied I was thought to not only learn from my mistakes, but also the good things, during my internships. Similar if your boss only tells you when do you do something wrong, you'll never understand…

  • Right, we all heard about the "thyrush1t" There's plenty of good stuff in the book :3

  • Yeah, I realized that I'm really liking the amount of options and versatility of the Cuatl.

  • Uh... Do I understand teh rules correct in regards to Channel?: Channel (1) = 1 Veil Token. 3 Veil Tokens = 1 Magic Dice. So if you have 3 Wizard adepts, or perhaps 1 cuatl + 2 wizard adept stygiosaurs you gain 3 Veil Tokens and may generate 1 magic dice?

  • The new paths as well as the new books (WoDG 2.0) has been written in cooperation with the BGT. This happened as a way to guarantee that changes and new rules aren't driven purely from a rules perspective. For example: unit X needs something to make it better, so special rule X is introduced despite being completely out of sync with what you'd expect. So the "new" approach is to create the background from which the rules are created by, and not the other way around as the above hints at. With th…

  • They're not. The RT is just another team and not above everybody. As I said - I didn't say you shouldn't express your opinion, it's just the "this is the fault of team X" is very tiresome and honestly at certain times disrespectful.

  • Actually this isn't about the RT, from what I can remember. The background team is the main drive behind this. I think the RT had a bigger say in how many paths for what armies (in cooperation with the BGT). Anyway please stop the constant finger pointing. It gets tiresome as well. You can express your displeasure, but stop with the constant nagging.

  • I believe the cuatl has various options to get 1+6 spells, but I could remember wrong

  • Remember that we can now equip both magical shield and armour, which grants more flexibility than the good old armour of Destiny with great weapon =] We can easily hit armour rating 5 with mundane equipment on foot

  • Looks great

  • Quote from JeroBeam: “Quote from Pinktaco: “Some talk about stygiosaur spell selection: Remember that the hereditary spell isn't a replica spell, so only on 1 caster. With that said we have plenty of ways to get a healthy amount of spells. ” Why? I thought, that means you just can attempt to cast it once per phase, but you can have it on more casters, or not? €dit: Btw, Cuatl looks great! Good work here! ” Might have mixed those two up

  • Some talk about stygiosaur spell selection: Remember that the hereditary spell isn't a replica spell, so only on 1 caster. With that said we have plenty of ways to get a healthy amount of spells.