Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 578.

  • Quote from Serwyn: “Are you jocking ? That would be absolutely awsome. It's great if it is compatible with MS and magical arrows. An elf with a giant bow throwing arrows that grow during the fly and hit like a balist ? Yeah ! But it would cost 200 points, which is faire because it is an enorm final cost and your character cannot do anything else than shooting since you took all its point allowance. AP6 not needed, but that's balance only. ” Errrr... Yeah, it would be awesome. So damn awesome tha…

  • The biggest issue with a S6 bolt thrower bow would be that it would in fact combo with the pathfinder MS(4) and scout way too well. And I'm sure nobody wants a single model scouting character that shots 4 S3[6] AP6 [MW(1D3)] penetrating shots at BS9-1. At least I hope so. You'd need better wording to make it work without stacking. I know it has been proposed in the HBE forum as well, as a replacement for our magic bow, and the fact that people were considering it baffled me. Quote from CariadocT…

  • Let's talk about 1.3

    Shadeseraph - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from sixfthoneybadger: “Chop off one head and two take it's place. ” HAIL HYDRA!

  • Let's talk about 1.3

    Shadeseraph - - General Discussion

    Post

    First, I do think that every one has his own idea of what "MSU" means. For example, @Baranovich post above more or less showcases what I consider "herohammer" or "monsterhammer" (depending on the most common component) - MSU (to me) only means that your army is composed by several cheap and disposable units (roughly, 200-400 pts each) working in accordance, so it can very much have as many models as a MMU or pure horde army. Personally, I find it more engaging visually because to me each model r…

  • Warseer Down?

    Shadeseraph - - WWW Topics

    Post

    Quote from Smooth Boy: “Good to see Warseer back but they need to sort out the sub-forums. Having only 'tactics' and 'background' as boards is too focused. We need a general. ” On the other side, I can see it as a move towards avoiding the "Whineseer Syndrome". "General" is where most of the worst stuff came from. Followed closely by rumours.

  • Let's talk about 1.3

    Shadeseraph - - General Discussion

    Post

    I dunno, I kind of like the magic system. Most other proposals have been kind of negate the gambling/negotiation aspect of the phase, which I think is a pity. I could see the dispel scroll / crown of scorn leaving, or becoming a flat +3/+4 to dispel once per game for few points, though (in addition to my previous suggestions about the magic phase). Most of my lists are scroll-less lately (though not magic-less).

  • Erratas versión española

    Shadeseraph - - Spain

    Post

    eso es cosa de la aplicación de foro que se usa, necesitas permisos de administrador para editar esa página. Y con más de 200 personas de staff como que no están las cosas como para regalar esos permisos, sobre todo cuando ya ha habido bastantes leaks.

  • Shapeshifter Discussion

    Shadeseraph - - Sylvan Elves (SE)

    Post

    Quote from zqn365: “WereDoombull shifter: Kill everything on sight and too tough to ever die! ” ShifterShifter - he can transform into a shifter. So he can transform into an elf that can transform into an elf.

  • Quote from Hachiman Taro: “Also I think it would help more than Blade Dancers - since it goes really nicely with our iconic ever present of Sylvan Blades. And Kestrels too I think? It all seems to tie together beautifully IMHO. ” Kestrels wouldn't see any help from that rule, as they already are monstrous cavalry (so they have monstrous support), and monscav mounts never make supporting attacks. Quote from Hachiman Taro: “Is there no chance it could happen for 1.31? It seems like such an elegant…

  • Sorry that I have been unable to answer your queries lately - lots of things to do in and out of the forum Quote from Isma_Banano: “Are we getting the hotfix today Mr. @blonde beer Mr. @Shadeseraph ? ” Quite probably.

  • Let's talk about 1.3

    Shadeseraph - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Lagerlof: “I didn't really understand what your side of the argument was, so that makes it hard to see it. Hence I asked you to elaborate. Writing with big letters does not make it any more clear however. ” Note that it might not be him actively changing the font of his post. I've noticed that for some reason, if you write from a smartphone sometimes the text changes size for no apparent reason.

  • lo sabemos, estamos trabajando en ello.

  • Let's talk about 1.3

    Shadeseraph - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from fjugin: “Here we recently added @Shadeseraph and @There Is No Spoon to help out with this. ” Yeah, we've been doing a bit of everything lately (from PR to temp-ACS) and have been unable to define our role correctly (too much work due to the 1.3 release). I hope we can define it a bit better at some point - we are going to skype about it with @blonde beer after Christmas.

  • Quote from Pablo: “Pero en unidad de carros? O unidos a otra unidad de caballería rápida? ” bueno, en teoría ambos. Si un personaje en carro se une a una unidad de reavers, mantendrían tropas ligeras (aunque moviendo 9"). Si se une uno de leones, perderían tropas ligera. Y a parte, si, las unidades de carros también necesitan tropas ligeras o tendrían que pivotar, y de hecho si se une un personaje en carro de leones a una unidad de carros de caballos, tampoco pueden usar tropas ligeras.

  • Quote from Pablo: “Hola buenas! Que diferencia tiene el carro de caballos con tropas ligeras, respecto al carro de leones o cualquier otro carro sin esa regla especial. ” Ninguna. Tropas ligeras importa si lo llevas en unidad.

  • Quote from Korpacz: “So far 9 people have liked this post. I'd like to nominate myself for the army book team. ” If you want to apply for a position in the team, contact HR through PM, we are always looking for people willing to help. As an asides, and at the risk of sounding rude - please remember that we have a life beyond the forums (I'm at work right now, for example), and there is a ton of activity going on. Your last post is from 10 hours ago, excuse us if we can't give you an instant answ…

  • OCD for the win

  • @deploying forest: didn't know that. then, if blade dancers lost skirmish, which unit do you think could gain it without becoming to much of a hindrance but that forced the player to take risks?

  • Quote from CariadocThorne: “If you want proof, find another competant SE player, give him a unit of 10 sentinels while you take a max size block of HBE blademasters, start at any distance you like, with no terrain, no turn limit, see who wins. ” In this sense, @Arrahed made in an internal forum a point that is very interesting. If we are only counting points based on killed models on each side - I heartilly agree - but (and this is food for thought for the future) depending on what the secondary…

  • Quote from Unknown_Enemy: “No, what I am at a loss is how to deal with special attacks. ” I know the feeling. I think that my worst experience was in the early stages of T9A, a certain dwarf player (hello, Pelle!) threw at me a bucketfull of dwarves with breath runes. I still have a bit of PTSD.