Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 259.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • Quote from Emgies: “Daemon's Bane was designed specificly as a non-shield armour enchantment, the equivalent and opposite of Ghostly Guard. They can't be combined. That was intended. Making it in a shield enchantment doesn't solve the design issue at hand. ” Yes. . . Yes it would actually. The team could even leave at its current point cost, and as long as Ghostly Guard was still a armor Enchantment then it could, and would be used. At any time you would have a +1AS on any mounted model when usi…

  • This list looks awful and has a ton of just I’ll fitting/1.3 vestiages. 30 Archers? You only need 24 to go 3 deep now (don’t justify it, it’s simply bad). Cav Prince is not a Fire Phoeinex at all in functionality . . . Your Cav Prince cannot cause damage by avoiding combat ala Fire Phoenix. Secondly, the Pheoniex is free points to anyone with as much or more shooting. No Ward requires a HBE General to field Grey Watchers to get the same effectiveness . . I’ll pass on the latter, because lack of …

  • Shifting Tides 8

    Trains_Get_Robbed - - UB league

    Post

    Place holder. I’m going to delve back into UB2 and design a list tomorrow. I’m in East African Time +3:00 UTC.

  • Quote from Emgies: “Daemon's Bane was designed specificly as a non-shield armour enchantment, the equivalent and opposite of Ghostly Guard. They can't be combined. That was intended. Making it in a shield enchantment doesn't solve the design issue at hand. ” Yes. . . Yes it would actually. The team could even leave at its current point cost, and as long as Ghostly Guard was still a armor Enchantment then it could, and would be used. At any time you would have a +1AS on any mounted model when usi…

  • Quote from Aegon: “Quote from Adam: “Quote from Aegon: “High Prince - Special Equipment: --> Diadem of Protection --> Daemon's Bane --> Ghostly Guard --> Cleansing Light --> Lucky Charm --> Potion of Swiftness ” 3 artifacts, 2 armor enchantments, no wonder it sounds decent ” Haha, my bad Remove the Potion of Swiftness then . Still viable, don't you think? ” No I think it’s illegal still because you have two armor enchantments on a single armor slot. . . Which you know would have been fine if the…

  • Quote from Randdogs: “Quote from Hachiman Taro: “The thing I would add is that I think HBE's defensive strength should be something other than 'Avoid Hits' and that should be the differentiation in style from SE so that they both solve 'the elf problem' with different styles. When I think of HBE I think of pride and quality. So master crafted armour and defences that dare you to try and breach them make sense. Whereas SE are more flighty and capricious therefore likely to not have any shame in n…

  • Quote from Mousterian: “Oh by the way our internally balanced book (whatever that means) is ranked at a power level 5 out of 6. So cool. ” Those rankings are hardly accurate. They were done by ETC captains being polled (and not even all of them at that) as well as a handful of ivory tower members. HBE for example are in Tier 3 in their voting process. When compared with what data I've personally collected off of Warscore, T3, here, etc. . . has them ranked 14th/15th depending on how many tournam…

  • I don't see this spell being worth it still. I'll take regen from Life, or the ward save from Cosmo, or +1R -when applicable- everytime.

  • Quote from Adam: “Quote from ArchangelusM: “Quote from Adam: “@ArchangelusM after I have seen current spoilers for may update another route was chosen - just make each honor horrible and possibly people will start using vanilla characters. ” I will not pretend that the HWotF change is not a nerf.It is. It would not have been done if it was just up to me. But since the change was mandatory, I think the end result is not catastrophic. The honour became strictly better vs anything with Regeneration…

  • *Pasues, and looks up from Total War Warhammer* Oh the new Edition dropped today? . . . Hmm is it even worth staring disappointment in the face? I guess I’ll go peruse, maybe your insiders aren’t entirely right after all. Plus, you should show some earnest you are “on” the PT team. . . -Fire Phoenix still doesn’t get its Ward save back and still costs #420blazeit -that’s cute -Frost Phoenix worse than 1.3 what idiom do they say about insanity? -Crystal is still over priced -Nova Flare is just ch…

  • Quote from WhammeWhamme: “So: Reducing the CV by 1-2 is the most likely fix. Restoring the old power level seems highly unlikely. Best case scenario there is pretty broken. A new effect (given the reasonably good argument that the current version simply doesn't work well and can be considered a good idea that didn't pan out and needs replacing) seems like a possibility. One thought I have had is: "Why is this not Summer Growth?" (or the off-brand generic version ) Seriously. It's an effect direc…

  • Quote from Alzam: “In the beginning of movement phase, it is stated that for a effect to apply on a move (like +1adv, strider,...), it needs only to be present at the start of the move. So yes, raw and rai you can march out 15" a character out of a unit that activated Relentless ” That's some powerful effects right there jimbo. I'm making lists abusing that ruling.

  • This army is op NERF HAMMER pls. #whoami

  • The wording is as follows on Icon of Relentless Company: "One use only. May be activated during the controlling player’s Movement Phase. All Infantry models in the bearer’s unit always have March Rate 15′′, until the end of the Player Turn. Only a single Banner of the Relentless Company may be activated during the same Phase." The question: Can you use this banner to march a character (or five) out x3, or do you have to stay in the unit to have it's effect resolved? When does the point of activa…

  • Quote from Adam: “Ancient dragon cannot be fixed without core rules change - laser aimed WMs and even more importantly challenges. Without core rule change you have couple of options: - make something that breaks at least one of the two and be special snowflake (which most likely won't be allowed or will be ridiculously priced) - make super strong monster that will make some lists cry and still struggle against it's counters (not allowed because pricing for the best scenario) - stay where we are…

  • Excuse my ignorance didn't realize there was a second page. Good showing dudes!

  • Quote from Bugman: “Quote from Pellegrim: “Sounds good - if there are any results know, I'd love to see em ” Here ” This link does not lead anywhere.

  • Quote from Debelial: “DeBelial wrote: Taken from a global WIn-ratio point of view, the table says : * * % Wins * Dread Elves * 60,286% * Daemon Legions * 55,667% * Orcs and Goblins * 53,200% * Undying Dynasties * 50,200% * Dwarven Holds * 48,000% * Sylvan Elves * 47,800% * Ogre Khans * 43,571% * The Vermin Swarm * 43,267% * Kingdom of Equitaine * 43,067% * Beast Herds * 42,067% * Saurian Ancients * 41,467% * Vampire Covenant * 40,000% * Warriors of the Dark Gods * 39,933% * Infernal Dwarves * 36…

  • I apologize in advance for some of the quotes. I started writing this yesterday (or the day before) and added more quotes while in turn losing some of the quotes I already had. Thus, summing them up the best I can. Quote from CariadocThrone: “ . . .Words for the word god about how avoidance has changed over the years to a less combat oriented style (spoilers no it hasn't). ” . . . modern avoidance is exactly that and has been that for at least three editions now. Do players not throw 7 Wild Ride…

  • This tournaments pairing system still completely eludes me (and I've gone over it like 8 times). I know there's a "losers" bracket missing for a round 5 elim, but exactly what some posters said would happen, happened. Poland #3 came from such bracket, was inserted in the next round and is now in the final 4. . . odd. Still interesting, but odd.