Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 1,000. There are more results available, please enhance your search parameters.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • Quote from IoRi78: “Quote from grungimusic: “Quote from DanT: “Quote from grungimusic: “And I love how you complain about civility at the slightest opposition, yet respond with that kind of snark and ridicule Are we going to be civil or snide; I'm fine with either but could you just pick one? I am not making up the quote "move as far away from legacy as possible". It was @Frederick who made it in a conversation with @tiny and others. Moreover, the design direction thus far has proven fairly cons…

  • Quote from DanT: “Quote from grungimusic: “And I love how you complain about civility at the slightest opposition, yet respond with that kind of snark and ridicule Are we going to be civil or snide; I'm fine with either but could you just pick one? I am not making up the quote "move as far away from legacy as possible". It was @Frederick who made it in a conversation with @tiny and others. Moreover, the design direction thus far has proven fairly consistent with that philosophy. It is very often…

  • Quote from IoRi78: “Quote from grungimusic: “Quote from DanT: “Quote from grungimusic: “I maintain that the intention all along has been to "move as far away from legacy as possible" which is a quote I attribute to someone who has driven rules creation for several armies. Consistent with this philosophy, I think the FABs will include a number of radical changes made to units considered too "legacy". By keeping these changes secret, they can release them in relatively small doses on a staggered s…

  • Quote from DanT: “Quote from grungimusic: “I maintain that the intention all along has been to "move as far away from legacy as possible" which is a quote I attribute to someone who has driven rules creation for several armies. Consistent with this philosophy, I think the FABs will include a number of radical changes made to units considered too "legacy". By keeping these changes secret, they can release them in relatively small doses on a staggered schedule, operating on the premise that we, th…

  • Quote from Desmoze: “what did you applause ? the release of an old alpha book, created i don't even know when with so many things already changed in it that you absolutely can't even use it ? well, in that case i'll create my own DL army book it will be as useful as this one there is reasons behind all this secret policies, they could spoil more things or change some things in their way of doing but all of them have good intention... @Rboaz, the current "beta" book didn't change since months and…

  • Quote from IoRi78: “Quote from grungimusic: “Quote from IoRi78: “Quote from grungimusic: “I applaud his actions. The secrecy surrounding this project lacks any merit. It is not only unnecessary, but counterproductive. ” where is the merit in spoil something that is not finished and subject to change? ” Where is the harm? ” that people make wrong ideas, maybe buy models or sell on false/not finished ideas? than come here to complain that we have fooled them? at this stage even Quick Starter infor…

  • Quote from IoRi78: “Quote from grungimusic: “I applaud his actions. The secrecy surrounding this project lacks any merit. It is not only unnecessary, but counterproductive. ” where is the merit in spoil something that is not finished and subject to change? ” Where is the harm?

  • I applaud his actions. The secrecy surrounding this project lacks any merit. It is not only unnecessary, but counterproductive.

  • I saw a FB post on several US sites (with a link) that 2.0 was released recently.

  • Hey all, as the title says, this thread is to provide feedback about the newly released draft of the DL 2.0 book.

  • We wanted to get this puppy out the door, and the DD store is a known, affordable location with comfy chairs. It will likely rotate around the country in successive years.

  • Are the day 1 standings on warscore?

  • Quote from Gym Shorts: “Thanks for all the time you put in organizing, checking and posting the lists mark! ” This x1000. Your time and effort is really appreciated here Mark

  • AB the best builder imho; just make sure you're using the most recent update

  • Quote from Squirrelloid: “Quote from Frumious: “I'm firmly for square basses, but also don't think we want wide spread changes to all the rules or points for war machines for gold (nor do I really think that's needed, but I can see some people do). One solution is to announce square basses for war machines in 3.0 ... and work towards that. Give people time (2 years I hope) to mentally adjust and plan for rebassing (and I know all about making fancy bases trust me). So that's a firm decision that…

  • Quote from Konrad von Richtmark: “If warmachines had actual firing arcs, placing them in tricksy ways to make life hard for warmachine hunters would likely become far less of an issue. Having relevant targets to shoot at in the front arc would be a much higher priority. ” Very true, it would also necessitate a huge price cut or likely phase them out of most competitive builds

  • Quote from Ungrik: “I hopped on the T9A train mainly to keep playing with the armies and miniatures I had, without having to rebase them. All of a sudden I still have to rebase models! (with the limited hobby time I have) That is my biggest issue with this discussion. No I will not rage quit if they go square, but I will be a little bit dissappointed. ” Ungrik how do you respond to people who say that "you don't need to rebase, just add a plastic square below your warmachines during games".

  • Quote from WhammeWhamme: “You need to read the ID book my friend. We HAVE that unit... ” I have tried, but the only unit I ever remember is the portable flame cannons

  • Quote from WhammeWhamme: “Quote from grungimusic: “weapon teams and war machines have significantly different mechanics tho, but if the proposal includes allowing DH organ guns to march 6" then fire, I will immediately change my vote ” Snrk. I am sure that can be arranged. Oh but you only get 1d6 shots hooe tgat is okay? ” Please don't joke. RT members might read your post and get ideas for the the "legacy free" FAB rework

  • weapon teams and war machines have significantly different mechanics tho, but if the proposal includes allowing DH organ guns to march 6" then fire, I will immediately change my vote