Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 567.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • Infernal Dwarves FAQ

    Gomio - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    I know that you dont have access to new material, thats why I said that it was irrelevant if DL book was released or not, and so, I was informing you that things look different now. Im not pointing to anything in particular in the next FAB, since I cant, but when you see it you'll quickly recognize that you (or I) wouldnt have dared to send some of these new designs for approbal/review, because they would have seemed like insta-rejection based in previous experiences (not saying that they are br…

  • Infernal Dwarves FAQ

    Gomio - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from Kathal: “Quote from Gomio: “- There was also a non-written guideline about not making "R5, 2+ Ar" monstruos cavalries... and I dont see Anointed breaking the game. ” Cause Anointed suck balls damage wise? You cannot compare a Monstrous Cav unit to a Monstrous Beast unit, cause of the lack of an Rider/Mount. In the same vain, you will never see a 1+ AS Monstrous Cav unit in the game again. I can compare a Large Cavalry with other Large Cavalries. It just makes sense that some have bett…

  • Infernal Dwarves FAQ

    Gomio - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Its true that 1+/4+ flying monstrous mounts were banned from the game since beginning for good reasons. Thanks. Still, I'll never say never to C+1 armour mounts: - There was also a non-written guideline about not making "R5, 2+ Ar" monstruos cavalries... and I dont see Anointed breaking the game. - Just looking at DL FAB they seem to be breaking some "moulds" already. FABs are different and what before could be seen as impossible, can actually happen. - Armies cant get a 4+ aegis as easily as be…

  • Maybe this game could give you some inspiration for a scylla replacement or for other things. Lots of miniatures representing the greek mythology. "https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/806316071/mythic-battles-pantheon"

  • The 9th AGE - Meme Thread

    Gomio - - WWW Topics

    Post

    Since you ask.. I have many about BLT and RT. 1253uav.jpg

  • Infernal Dwarves FAQ

    Gomio - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Looking at old 0.XXX versions of the ID, You can see that Bull and Lamassu never had Mounts Protection on that time. So, why no C+1? Because they didnt had Mounts Protection before. Why didnt have Mounts Protection before? Seems like the result from porting them (from the abyss of imagination of course) in the initial version of the game. Could this change in the future? Considering that now ID have Strength in Armour ASAW, mounts giving +1 armour could be definitively a thing. (but I dont want …

  • The 9th AGE - Meme Thread

    Gomio - - WWW Topics

    Post

    qrlmqb.jpg Im definitely a 7.

  • Guys, I understand and share your frustration. Still, what Grimbold has commented is only a chance of what could happen, higher-ups continuously discuss these things and it would be an endless process having to communicate and wait for feedback about every intention that could happen or not. Communication is indeed an issue internally, but sometimes we have to rely in the appropriate people making the appropriate decisions without us even knowing. This project is built on trusting that the other…

  • The 9th AGE - Meme Thread

    Gomio - - WWW Topics

    Post

    29o0ruw.jpg

  • As far as I know, there is some current work for setting up the bases of the armies for FABs. Lets say, the common ground that elves or dwarves should share between armies, for example. And it will be done in "racial" batches.

  • I guess that delaying ID in the FAB queue will probably mean a bigger delay than a single book done before or it wouldnt be even mentioned. At least, would probably mean no ID FAB in 2019. I think it is very positive having a pure balance patch at the end of the year. So BLT can use all the feedback received during that time. Just want to be sure that RT or EXB or whoever is taking these decisions are aware of the negative implications that leaving ID stuck with current CoA will have. Im not tal…

  • Well, ID FAB having a chance of not being the following one done is breaking news to me... I understand your "more wide" point of view and I applaud you for sharing it here. But if it ends happening, I'll be up in arms for getting CoA finally changed before design changes are locked for a while. I hope that a decision in this matter can be made soon, so we can be informed and have a chance to react accordingly.

  • Quote from Shane: “If it would save 1.5ppw on models, i’d take the points over the rule in a heartbeat. ” Cant really talk about pricing, but considering that Infernal Warriors and DH Clan Warriors both cost 13ppm and they have Devastating Charge (that it is traditionally costed at 1ppm and shield wall is costed into their shield option) while Infernal Warriors have "semi-immunity to fear", "immunity to greenskin panic" and "second round battle focus"... I would say that second round battle focu…

  • There is no experimenting with ID. What is happening is that when CoA was changed in 2.0 update, the team was (more or less) waiting to work in the ID FAB before this summer, so there was like a 6 months time frame to test it. But as you may know, everything is going slower than expected with FABs. The "cold" reception of WDG has required more "re-work" than expected and DL is showing to be the biggest task that, probably, any army will see ever; resulting in constant delays. We tried so hard to…

  • Infernal Dwarves FAQ

    Gomio - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    I always thought that the stackable march movement was the reason why RT asked us to drop the wolf riders from the whip effect.

  • The 9th AGE - Meme Thread

    Gomio - - WWW Topics

    Post

    ak78g4.jpg

  • The 9th AGE - Meme Thread

    Gomio - - WWW Topics

    Post

    2hp3tkh.jpg

  • Quote from Tyranno: “Quote from Gomio: “It seems that the 205 update will be only a balance patch. So, only points adjustments will be made for all armies. Maybe there could be some exceptions in few cases that there is a big need of a change, because there could be issues that points cant fix, but I dont know if it will be the case for ID or if even there will be a chance of doing that. ” Does not hurt to ask I guess. Perhaps a case could be made since we are "next in line". ” As ACS you could …

  • Quote from Manxol: “Just for curiosity... There are a BLT asigned to each army or it is a single team? Because sometimes the consensus between armies is lacking, IMHO. ” Each army gets one or two BLT members asigned to help from the balance point of view, while we are in the design phase, for example in the last update: Me: Hey, what would be BLT reaction to Bound Daemon being able to pivot in place and shoot? BLT assigned member: Something like 20 points increase, maybe more. Me: Ok, team what …

  • Quote from Fieres: “Tbh don't know how I feel about this. ID need a number of changes, and if this doesn't happen in 205 (October?) , I guess it means that we'll have to wait a year for an update/fix? ” It seems that the 205 update will be only a balance patch. So, only points adjustments will be made for all armies. Maybe there could be some exceptions in few cases that there is a big need of a change, because there could be issues that points cant fix, but I dont know if it will be the case fo…