Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 28.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • What stores / clubs do you know

    Kris - - Supporters Corner

    Post

    Store: Unispel, Lund, Sweden unispel.com Club: Malmö figurspelsförening, Malmö, Sweden facebook.com/search/top/?q=malmo%20figurspelsforening

  • Yea those are epic, but it seems like the chance of getting some is slim

  • Battlescribe Files

    Kris - - Supporters Corner

    Post

    Quote from Twisted Magpie: “@Karanadon Does that mean that v21 is void? it still shows up in my list (I added it manualy but don't know how to delete again as it's not under repository list). If it helps I'm on the app, not the PC version. ” Yes it is void. The latest version is called "SA v1 (0.99.1)" I'm not sure where you find the files on the app, but it helped me to delete them and update again (on the PC).

  • Rules: Short Question - Short Answer

    Kris - - Archive

    Post

    Ok thanks, thought that it could have been a mistake. I just think it would be more clear and less text intensive to use more rule writing like on the Impact hits(x)/(+x) or Dangerous terrain tests(x) for such as well. Same goes for fight in extra ranks etc.

  • Rules: Short Question - Short Answer

    Kris - - Archive

    Post

    Does the Snake swarms "Venomous tide" stack with other poison sources? Other sources like Putrefying touch, Altar of the snake-god for exampel states that it does. If it does (or doesn't) it could be clarified like the others. Perhaps implement the writing "Poison(+1)" or something similar to other rule writings? Cheers!

  • Battlescribe Files

    Kris - - Supporters Corner

    Post

    @Karanadon Found a sneaky error that some SA players might miss. -There is no warning when taking magic banner on a BSB, together with other magic items bringing it over the 50p limit of a hero. This applies to both Skink Captain and Saurian Veteran. -Also on the Cuatl lord's wizard options, the path of life needs to be "Path of Nature" Keep it up!

  • Battlescribe Files

    Kris - - Supporters Corner

    Post

    I've had it turned off since you became the source of power (files) Did you change the name to v22 when you did the last update? It could perhaps be some issue with battlescribe updating/importing files with the same name? I had the same issue (and perhaps others?) when you kept the old file name once before, think it was the update v18->v19 or something that didn't want to change until you renamed it. Thanks!

  • Battlescribe Files

    Kris - - Supporters Corner

    Post

    Quote from Karanadon: “ @Kris, I'm 99.99% sure I fixed all those? will double check. ” Ok, plz do I imported your latest (v21) today and still see those "issues". No biggie though, it would be even greater if the common item descriptions that are missing could get in there. I think @Arturius said that they could be copied from some other army a while ago.

  • Battlescribe Files

    Kris - - Supporters Corner

    Post

    Quote from Kris: “@Karanadon Great work! I noticed some more in the SA v.21 file In the mount profile for: -Raptor -Alpha Ramphodon There is an entry called "Natural armor" with all blanks. This is a leftover from something, but could be removed I guess. Also all the "mount's protection (x)" rules are called an armor or equipment in the book/wiki. Perhaps it would be better if it was placed among other armor entries? Instead of under "special rules" as it's now? In the mount profile of Taurosaur…

  • It would feel better to add some unique function to core a.k.a "The bulk of the army" that makes you want/need them in tactical terms to win, not only "you must have them because of the fluff and here's your min 25% plus tax punishment system". I'm sure with the right balance and rules in place you could find a way to have both. -Like the suggestion I read somehere about Core being the only scoring units was great. -And I think rules that make special/rare go to core needs to be reversed. X numb…

  • Interesting and great history summary. Appreciate the effort of bringing some light on why things look like they do.

  • You all know him, King of the jungle, the Saurian Warlord on his once more common mount the-ninth-age.com/index.php?at…2129e50e1794bcb1cacc56342the-ninth-age.com/index.php?at…2129e50e1794bcb1cacc56342the-ninth-age.com/index.php?at…2129e50e1794bcb1cacc56342

  • Challenges and Champions

    Kris - - Archive

    Post

    For me one of the worsed rules in WFB has always been Challenges. I think it costs more than what it gives, in game terms, added rules/exception, time and wierd situation that come out of it. Just look at the Challenge with ridden monsters for example. In some cases it's a big blow for characters on foot having to face a dual model at a sure death. On the other end we have the big bad model charge (perhaps with impacts as well) just to become instant challenged by a 10p Champion to save the unit…

  • haha that's the place Perhaps this could be moved there? Cheers

  • I think my title was a bit off now but anyway All valid reasons. A clean "removal" of Core would of course not work at all. But that points to one thing, that the balance is not only made between units but between the categories they are in (because the category system allows some units to be better in all regards). If you were to skip categories and just have a list of units to pick from, it would all come down to point cost and what you get. But let's not think so extreme as with no categories…

  • Rules: Short Question - Short Answer

    Kris - - Archive

    Post

    Hi, two quick questions: -Thyroscutus does it give it's ability (+1WS or Poison) to itself aswell? If not perhaps clearify in the text with "other friendly" or such. -A unit with WS2 vs WS5 normally hits on 5+. But if this unit has poison 4+ (from ex base poison+Thyroscutus+spell) will it override the "normal to hit rule" or will the poison cap out at max 5+? This could also be clarified somehow. Thanks!

  • Hope this is the right place. In all the balance talks a lot comes down to the balance between Core units and other types. Durring the whole reign of Warhammer, Core has always been that rather large part of forced "crap" units that most didn't really want. From a model selling firms view (GW) the rule is all fine, they want to sell volumes, so force ppl to have a minimum number of units, but T9A don't have that need. So I would like to hear the reason for T9A to still keep the Core minimum tax,…

  • Battlescribe Files

    Kris - - Supporters Corner

    Post

    @Karanadon Great work! I noticed some more in the SA v.21 file In the mount profile for: -Raptor -Alpha Ramphodon There is an entry called "Natural armor" with all blanks. This is a leftover from something, but could be removed I guess. Also all the "mount's protection (x)" rules are called an armor or equipment in the book/wiki. Perhaps it would be better if it was placed among other armor entries? Instead of under "special rules" as it's now? In the mount profile of Taurosaur The Skink crew sh…

  • Battlescribe Files

    Kris - - Supporters Corner

    Post

    @Karanadon In the SA file (v20) found some corrections -Weapon beasts should have S4 -The Alpha Pteradon and Rhamphodon mounts should have mounts protection (6+) -The Skink Palanquin should also have mounts protection (6+) -The Raptor mount should have mounts protection (5+) Cheers!

  • Ok, thx!