Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 111.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • V205 Error report thread

    Eru - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Ghiznuk: “Quote from BRB: “Miscast Effects (apply after resolving the effects of the spell and any Attribute Spell) 111 –> The Casting Attempt fails (apply Fizzle as normal) ” Should the Casting Attempt fail BEFORE or AFTER resolving the effects of the spell ? ” That's the Summaries right? There's no room there :p Refer to the normal rules if you can't find that out yourself ;D

  • Fireforge Games support 9th Age

    Eru - - Company Showcase

    Post

    Quote from Glonojad: “Is it possible to assemble all models as armed? Or do I have to make some non combat personnel? ” Wait, a broomstick is definitely combat ready! And beware the wicker basket, you can have a giant sword, but you can't see anything with a basket on the head!

  • V205 Discussion thread

    Eru - - General Discussion

    Post

    As you are a translator, you also have access to the LaTeX repository, in which the figures are in .pdf format (without text).

  • TMS - Releases

    Eru - - Company Showcase

    Post

    Quote from greentide: “Quote from Kanadian: “When 2.0 Comes out TMS will be printing a large number of books (probably) ” Is this still up to date/planned- a printed version of rulebook 2.0?Christmas seems to be the right point of time ” The gold full book will probably not be ready for Christmas. The slim Rulebook should be.

  • V205 Discussion thread

    Eru - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Malda: “Quote from MountainBuns: “Hello! So why don’t we copy spell types (hex, direct, ect) and wizard types (apprentice, adept, master) to the arcane compendium? I like looking at spells and it will read something like “direct, damage, missile” and then I have to go to the brb and look up the types. It’s kind of unintuitive and not fun. What if we copy or move the spell types to the arcane compendium so I can just look them up in the same book as the spells. Consolidate magic. ” And…

  • Norba Miniatures supports Ninth Age

    Eru - - Company Showcase

    Post

    Its looks like I'll finally order my first Norba Miniature!

  • V205 Error report thread

    Eru - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from elendor_f: “I think this has not been reported yet but in p.126, the Summaries, the table of Probabilities talks about Leadership tests instead of Discipline tests ” Woooops For my defence, it was very late in the night!

  • V205 Discussion thread

    Eru - - General Discussion

    Post

    Yes, a two column layout was asked by Lectoring. But I haven't found the time to try it. As we're in a transition period, we are changing the army books from Google Docs to LaTeX, we don't have a lot of time to experiment things like this. But it's on the to-do list, so it will happen... one day

  • Quote from azra: “avec Portent of Doom comment sa se passe dans le cas d'une unité composer uniquement de perso si je les divise ? ” Seul le perso qui reste à la fin garde le sort. Et le sort fait -X, X étant le nombre de persos. Pas X+1.

  • V205 Error report thread

    Eru - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from fjugin: “A solo character is not meant to be joined to itself as far as I am aware. Could be replaced with "each character after the 1st in the unit" or similar to clarify perhaps. Let's discuss within RCT ” Ah! Then I suggest the current wording: where X is the number of Characters in the unit, +1 if there are R&F models in the unit. Then a solo Character = -1 A unit with X Character = -(X+1) A unit composed only of X Characters = -X Is that the intent?

  • V205 Error report thread

    Eru - - General Discussion

    Post

    We anyway need to clarify if a solo character is joined to its own unit.

  • V205 Error report thread

    Eru - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Eisenheinrich: “Quote from Searingash: “The Oaken Throne miss the type. ” Technically, Caster is both "Range" and "Type". Iirc there are technical reasons why the cells for range and type couldn't be merged, so that "Caster" would be centered below both of them, but I'll check. ” The technical issue being mainly that I forgot the suggestion :p Will do for the next version.

  • Quote from Exalted Champion: “Quote from Skarloc: “cards for v2.0.5?.. wouldn't it be much preferable to wait for v2 GOLD in a 2-3 months before asking the company to produce an updated set of cards?.. ” Gold in 2-3 months? Are you sure about this man? ” It's the plan! But as with any project based on voluntary work, we can't be 100 % certain

  • Iluvatar is currently on a T9A vacation, I'll look into finding a replacement to work on the cards if he doesn't come back in time for the GOLD release. In between, we'll have to wait!

  • V205 Discussion thread

    Eru - - General Discussion

    Post

    How does Cover work for models on round bases, since they only have one Facing? For a Standard Height model, half of the Facing is always hidden.

  • The 9th AGE - Meme Thread

    Eru - - WWW Topics

    Post

    Quote from Giladis: “Quote from Eru: “Lol. They should better redesign the graphics of Diablo 2. I would buy it for sure! ” While you wait on that have you tried Diablo 1 Belzebub mod? ” No! I'm going to google that! But I've grown up with Diablo 2, haven't played the one (Boooooooh :p)

  • V205 Error report thread

    Eru - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Kathal: “There is, if you have an '8' magic phase ” Yeah, I chose to disregard those and Thaumaturgy (reroll 1s, reroll 1s and 2s) to avoid having a table with 256 entries :p

  • The 9th AGE - Meme Thread

    Eru - - WWW Topics

    Post

    Lol. They should better redesign the graphics of Diablo 2. I would buy it for sure!

  • V205 Error report thread

    Eru - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Minidudul: “Triple 1 on 3 dice casting don't cancel the spell, as there is a -1 miscast modifier that leads to 000 (nothing happens), so 100% for 3+ is correct. (but I'm sure almost nobody recall this modifiers as it's not noted in the table) ” Damn forgot about that one! Thank you. I do have to take into account that triple 2 is a fail though. So the table is really wrong. As on 5D6, there is no 111 possible.