Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 48.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • DL FAB 2.0 rule feedback

    Jawor - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    One of users of our forum replied: There is problem, because in all other books we using friendly magic phase or enemy magic phase. And additionally there is Immortal denizes that affect both players.

  • DL FAB 2.0 rule feedback

    Jawor - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from pk-ng: “No offense but wtf? in english its pretty clear. ” Idk. Maybe if there would be "bearer Player turn" it would easier.

  • DL FAB 2.0 rule feedback

    Jawor - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from IoRi78: “Quote from Jawor: “Its stupid I know, but someone said, that In opponet phase Sentinel did not move etc. so opponet can convert vails for 2:1. Like a Omniscience would be a global rule. ” I have no word. ” I Will post that on our local forum.

  • DL FAB 2.0 rule feedback

    Jawor - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Its stupid I know, but someone said, that In opponet phase Sentinel did not move etc. so opponet can convert vails for 2:1. Like a Omniscience would be a global rule.

  • DL FAB 2.0 rule feedback

    Jawor - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from Irondaemon: “The first I can agree on, for clarification, but what is unclear about the dominion rule? “The effects last until the end of the next player turn.” ” Omniscience, not dominion rule. Some of ppl want to know if it works for his opponent's.

  • DL FAB 2.0 rule feedback

    Jawor - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    We need FAQ for two clarifications: 1. How many attacks Courtesan do to opponet in challenge, when she is on flank/rear of a unit? 2. Does the Omniscience, special rule of a Sentinel of Nukuja, works in opponent's turn? That should be in first post.

  • DL FAB 2.0 rule feedback

    Jawor - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from IoRi78: “two things: 1. what was the Omen problem? Many see it as the best character. 2. How many dice you have? Why is a problem for you to give 2 veil and not for your opponent that you have 2 more veil? ” If your roster is not concentrated around magic, +2 adepts, additional veils from manifestations, its highly probability, that your opponent will have more veils tokens. ;/

  • DL FAB 2.0 rule feedback

    Jawor - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Plate armour on blazing glories maybe?

  • Quote from Stunt: “Anyone found optimal build for The omen yet? :P ” +1T and hate(dominion), he is inside succubi unit. No points for extra manifestations.

  • Quote from Jackginger: “Add in a blazing glory? Volley gun it with two hope harvester? Tarpit him with Lemures? ” I won't add blazing glory in my actual roster, Hope harvester hitting on 4/5+, wounding on 5+ and he saving on 3+/4++. Lemures were a option, but he add unit of tusker and wipe them in one turn ;/

  • Quote from Ursa06: “Quote from Jawor: “Quote from Adam: “Quote from Jawor: “This is the biggest problem I think in our book. No options for cowboys. ” Probably MW recastable low CV spell could help as well as having characters who have things like lethal strike and MW or S7-8 AP4-5. Probably access to Evocation and strong casters would help too, also maybe some shooting attack that ignores half of the armor. Things like fast AP3 chariots with lots of impact hits or really fast units with lethals…

  • Quote from Adam: “Quote from Jawor: “This is the biggest problem I think in our book. No options for cowboys. ” Probably MW recastable low CV spell could help as well as having characters who have things like lethal strike and MW or S7-8 AP4-5. Probably access to Evocation and strong casters would help too, also maybe some shooting attack that ignores half of the armor. Things like fast AP3 chariots with lots of impact hits or really fast units with lethals or something with AP at least 5 would …

  • How can we fight against heroes with 2+/4++? We can't. Miss DP of Change [*]. Regeneration? Only scourge can pick manif. with flaming att, but then cheap hero with 2+ on fire can block him whole game. 4++ ward? There is only one spell from divination, that would be just dispelled. Plus high armour save This is the biggest problem I think in our book. No options for cowboys.

  • Quote from Jackginger: “After reading the book several times I have to increase my praise. This book was done by amateurs with an interest in a shared hobby and can be downloaded for free. Still it is soooooooo much better than any GW Release i have experienced during 25 years in the hobby. Releases backed by a multi million $€£ Company with a team of guys and Artists being payed a full wage for creating a book. Thank you guys so much! ” Oh stop it, GW wasn't so bad, 8ed Deamon book was excellen…

  • I like this book, it's better then old one, we have a lot more options. More and cheaper GD's, cool units, but there should be some changes. There is a problem with high armour. Ok, I understand that we shouldn't have high saves, but so low AP in this is army is just wrong. I had problems before with KoE and other armies with units only with high saves, but now I can see my open bottom. In cores there is a problem with imps, to expensive and Myrmindos, high strange but ap1, they got so big nerf,…

  • DL FAB 2.0 rule feedback

    Jawor - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from IoRi78: “Quote from Jawor: “This is illogical, I dont need strenght without AP if opponet have highr armour. ” is not bounded to logic but Envy.The manifestation is the idea of strike someone with more force because he has something that the daemon don't have. ” Yea, but they have more armour, not toughness... I dont like this and I think its useless.

  • DL FAB 2.0 rule feedback

    Jawor - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    This is illogical, I dont need strenght without AP if opponet have highr armour.

  • DL FAB 2.0 rule feedback

    Jawor - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Piercing Spike - there should be armour piercing, not strenght. There is mistake or what?

  • I think trolls shouldn't be too cheap, there is problem with models, very expensive and hard to get. I would prefer more elite trolls than -3march, no fear, -1def/off, -1ap and no belch for points reduction. Their statline is ok now, but there is only problem with stupid mechanic. It's should be removed, they have only discipline 4 so if they lose combat they gone without generald ld, and it's ok. Risky buy playable.

  • Quote from arwaker: “Inspired by some ideas here around, my new ” So huge nerf in stats, no way.