Search Results

Search results 1-14 of 14.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • I use the mobile app, I didn't change any of the default data settings and it works fine - at least regarding the latest WDG update. I didn't look at DL though.

  • Thanks for the WDG update! I located the issue with the validation error for characters in WDG. To recreate this, create a 100pts roster, add a barbarian chief with basalt infusion. This costs 170pts, while the validation error says that I spent 160 too much from characters (maximum 45) - it should say 125 too much, i.e. the 35pts basalt infusion is double counted for the characters pts limit. Works the same with other types of magic equipment (I didn't check everything, just one of each type). …

  • Battlescribe files for T9A 2.0

    krzechu - - Supporters Corner

    Post

    Thanks a lot, it's really great that you devote your time to this! There may be more items to change regarding the rules displayed in the view/print window, I'll try to come up with a complete list this week - right now I just listed the ones that I noticed in the units I recently used. But that's just the rules text, I guess that point values are a much higher priority.

  • The point limit for characters is also not calculated properly for WDG. I'll try to play with the options to find specifically what's wrong. Some outdated stuff in WDG, mostly visible in the rules that you see in the view window: - Chosen Knights - the option 'replace spiked shield with halberd' should be removed, they don't have shields anymore and they have halberds by default - Hell forged armour now gives Aegis (5+, against Toxic Attacks) and doesn't give rerolls of march tests - Flayers los…

  • Yay, my list got 44 points cheaper for Christmas! I'm only wondering if that actually does mean that I suck at list building, as it was supposed to be bad under 2.05. So here's an idea from mr 'play-at-tournaments-twice-a-year-and-always-end-in-the-bottom-50%' The 2.05 version was: Barbarian Chief [365pts]: Battle Standard Bearer, Light Lance, Shadow Chaser, Shield, Throwing Weapons (4+), Basalt Infusion, Dragon Staff, Obsidian Rock Exalted Herald [850pts] Sorcerer [710pts]: Army General, Occult…

  • When a gluttony chosen chariot gets the +1 S bonus, does this apply to all attacks from the model, impact hits and karkadan included, or only to the crew? The rules for the favour refer first to a model with this favour, and then to a model part with this favour. I guess that the only model part with the favour here is the crew? Just wanted to make sure that I read this correct. Sorry to interrupt the exciting battleshrine wording discussion

  • At first glance, this looks just great Good job guys, well done! I'm not saing that only because everything bar the herald got buffed (well yes, this makes me happy of course), but maybe more importantly, it seems that some great models may see play more often, I mean dragon or FDA (symbol of slaughter seems to really shine on this guy - 9A Off7 S7 anyone?). Frankly, my first thought after skimming through the book was 'that's too good, they gonna nerf it'

  • Quote from umbranar: “Quote from Shukran: “battleshrine is a mage itself? If yes u can choose pnly from those magic listed? I like it. But towering presence and warplatform seems overkill. Or i miss something here? Herald...well i have another kind of definition for 850 being "cheaper". Fun thing is that we are goimg to play it regardless..because "less bad logic" Stendard. Nice. 50p but nice ” Towering presence does mean the wizard can look over the Forsworn and chariots though. Also means your…

  • V205 Discussion thread

    krzechu - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Alzam: “Quote from krzechu: “How does the new Bewitching Glare interact with Hopeless Shots? If my shooting attack hits on a 7+ and I roll a 6 on the first roll, normally I hit after subsequently rolling a 4+. In this case, with battle focus, do I get: 1. the 'basic' hit on 4+ and a certain 'extra' hit from battle focus, 2. both the basic and extra hit on one 4+ (rolling the 4+ once i.e. it's either 0 hits or 2 hits), 3. the basic hit on 4+ and the extra hit on 4+ (rolling the 4+ inde…

  • V205 Discussion thread

    krzechu - - General Discussion

    Post

    How does the new Bewitching Glare interact with Hopeless Shots? If my shooting attack hits on a 7+ and I roll a 6 on the first roll, normally I hit after subsequently rolling a 4+. In this case, with battle focus, do I get: 1. the 'basic' hit on 4+ and a certain 'extra' hit from battle focus, 2. both the basic and extra hit on one 4+ (rolling the 4+ once i.e. it's either 0 hits or 2 hits), 3. the basic hit on 4+ and the extra hit on 4+ (rolling the 4+ independently for each one, so anything betw…

  • @DeBelial thanks a lot! Apparently, your Google skills are way beyond mine

  • Hi, Can anyone who's got AoW Wasteland Warriors share a photo showing their size (next to a measuring tape or even better, next to a GW chaos warrior)? I wanted to use them as chosen, but I haven't seen the AoW models live - since I'm using GW warriors as wasteland warriors, I need to have my chosen at least that big. The only info I found was @kisanis saying (some 6 months ago and ca 20 pages back in this topic) that they're a little small compared to last GW versions. That would be unfortunate…

  • I think it wasn't mentioned so far - there is one more reason why the A,B,C,... labels for units is worth implementing: it also works well if you print the rulebook black-and-white. If you go for the black-and-white option with the current book, the figures are a bit tricky, as you need to guess which unit is which - it can be figured out from the context, but it takes some time.

  • Hi, I would clarify the (somewhat complicated, but I guess we need the exact precision here) rules for priority of modifiers. For me the table with 4 priorities was be a bit misleading and I spent a while reading the text a few times to get whether it's 'apply the modifiers starting from order no 1 down to order 4' or 'no 1 is the most important and shouldn't be changed by the next numbers'. You could add a simple example after the table, something like this below: 5.D Priority of Modifiers [Tab…