• The 9th Age: Fantasy Battles

    is a community-made miniatures wargame in which two armies clash in an epic battle.

    The 9th Age: Fantasy Battles
  • Are you a beginner?

    Here is a part of the website made for you.

    Are you a beginner?
  • Polyglot: Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, Polski

    ... and other languages spoken here

    Polyglot: Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, Polski
  • Donation

    There are many ways to support, donation is one.

    Donation

The 9th Age

Fantasy Battles: The 9th Age

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

Fantasy Battles: The 9th Age is an independent table top miniature wargame set in a fantasy world, in which players take control of armies and set them upon one another in conflicts ranging from minor skirmishes to mighty battles with hundreds of models.

The game and all of its rules are completely free to download and use, and consist of a main rulebook and over fifteen army documents, ranging from stoic men and noble elves to the feral orcs and dread worshipers of the dark gods. You can easily assemble your own army using appropriate 28mm miniatures from any manufacturer.

Fantasy Battles: The 9th Age has been created by a group of experienced wargamers, a large supportive staff and continuous input from the wargaming community. We aim to provide a competitive, balanced and fun game, with updates and new rules to be released regularly.

We’ve created 16 unique armies from the Dread Elves in the west to the Ogre Khans in the east. Each army has different units and playstyles and can be represented by models from any 28mm model company. People said it was impossible, but we have created a game that is both balanced and fun. Don’t believe us? Try it for yourselves.

Happy wargaming.
T9A

Newest News

Upcoming Events

  1. Sat, May 27th 2023 - Sun, May 28th 2023

    myth_pl

News

  • Disciples of Lugar
  • EoS Unit of 20 Flagellants
  • The Holy Crusade - a Witch Hunter Army
  • Orc Boar Boys

Recent Activities

  • SkavenInAZ -

    Replied to the thread OP rats? your cries here.

    Post
    Quote from Kapkan: “Your posts seem to be getting more and more toxic through this thread as I continue reading them. ” Because your arguments continue to grow more illogical. Quote from berti: “You don´t need an alchemist. So it is about 220 points…
  • Bulls Eye -

    Liked Pyrax’s post in the thread VS General Discussion Thread.

    Like (Post)
    Hey, i tried to play Disciples few times and still they are not included in my competitive play. Maybe the fearless could make them just fine to be special forces on the flanks :) Another minus is that assasins can't go out in this unit. So i think the…
  • Bulls Eye -

    Liked The Unmarked’s post in the thread VS General Discussion Thread.

    Like (Post)
    Quote from Crazydwarf: “swamp priest + Toga and he is safe inside the unit? ” Except the Errahman Swarm Priest is not a great choice in lists since it means we lose out the best two paths for triumvirate, Thaumaturgy and Witchcraft. The design of…
  • Gwydion -

    Replied to the thread OP rats? your cries here.

    Post
    Quote from Ehakir: “Meanwhile, me whilst looking at a failed dis 8 non-rerollable panic test on a 400 PTS unit of 7 warlock acolytes in an army that is 'strong at playing outside of the 12" bubble'. Because they took two wounds from a single fireball. ;(
  • VerminusValor -

    Liked Batosai’s post in the thread Thanks and goodbye.

    Like (Post)
    I probably don't agree on most of the details, but surely agree on the general theme of your post. It makes no sense that with every update the playstyle of the army changes. In December we give you shooting but in February it's all gone again, rinse…
  • Happy Aspid -

    Liked Kaitin’s post in the thread WDG General Discussion for 2023.

    Like (Post)
    The most boring path is an example of how things should be now... Ugh. Honestly, there was no point in asking RT if they think their design is bad or not. Obviously, they wouldn't release it if they'd think it's bad. Don't ask, tell them it is bad :D
  • VerminusValor -

    Liked Juanmi-SK’s post in the thread Thanks and goodbye.

    Like (Post)
    I'm sorry to hear that my friend and I hope it's not a real goodbye. I understand the frustration and I believe it's shared by many in this forum, although we have too many enemies! I think VS is a "strong" army, but after the latest patches, I agree…
  • Khadath -

    Replied to the thread SA Alpha - What and Why: FAQ.

    Post
    Quote from Marcema: “I'm indifferent about any feedback. Feedback is feedback and the ACS team will create a report for us which they present to us and that's what we will use when considering the community feedback. Quite frankly, any of the negative…
  • Just Wes -

    Replied to the thread KoE General Discussion thread.

    Post
    Maximum of 7 attacks from a full unit (+ horses) isn't a whole lot when you want to go chopping through a brick of infantry. Granted, that infantry unit (probably) won't be going anywhere anytime soon, especially if you've got healing elsewhere in the…
  • Ehakir -

    Replied to the thread OP rats? your cries here.

    Post
    Meanwhile, me whilst looking at a failed dis 8 non-rerollable panic test on a 400 PTS unit of 7 warlock acolytes in an army that is 'strong at playing outside of the 12" bubble'. Because they took two wounds from a single fireball. ;( (59% chance to pass…
  • Dragus -

    Liked skipschnit’s post in the thread DL general discussion thread.

    Like (Post)
    I think the Omen is about 70 points too expensive as it’s base cost. The same for the Throne. Take those costs down so that you can afford to customize it and his utility would increase, possibly before his low HP count does it in.
  • Ugrush -

    Replied to the thread SA Alpha - What and Why: FAQ.

    Post
    Quote from Marcema: “The item was created when we had a shield that granted Fortitude (+2) if i recall correctly. So true, not really much synergies, but its also why i mentioned before, removing the rule does nothing for the price anyway. The only…
  • Batosai -

    Replied to the thread Thanks and goodbye.

    Post
    I probably don't agree on most of the details, but surely agree on the general theme of your post. It makes no sense that with every update the playstyle of the army changes. In December we give you shooting but in February it's all gone again, rinse…
  • Pyrax -

    Replied to the thread VS General Discussion Thread.

    Post
    Hey, i tried to play Disciples few times and still they are not included in my competitive play. Maybe the fearless could make them just fine to be special forces on the flanks :) Another minus is that assasins can't go out in this unit. So i think the…
  • Juanmi-SK -

    Replied to the thread Thanks and goodbye.

    Post
    I'm sorry to hear that my friend and I hope it's not a real goodbye. I understand the frustration and I believe it's shared by many in this forum, although we have too many enemies! I think VS is a "strong" army, but after the latest patches, I agree…