Recent Activities

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • Danrakh -

    Replied to the thread Adam Battle reports.

    Post
    3rd pic ;)
  • Marcos24 -

    Liked SirMC2015’s post in the thread Chronicles of Lord Breslin.

    Like (Post)
    Twilight descended as we lit the fires. Breslin could be seen at the edge of the light, his back to us, still kneeling. As the sky got darker the other figures in the tree got closer. There was an eerie silence as they approached. The sound of limbs…
  • Marcos24 -

    Liked SirMC2015’s post in the thread Chronicles of Lord Breslin.

    Like (Post)
    Rayan, the childrens protector, was as large as a horse. His skin had faded lost any human pigment and was now shades of green and grey. The large grotesque body was devoid of hair, and what did grow in some areas looked closer to fur. The incisors…
  • Danrakh -

    Liked Adam’s post in the thread Adam Battle reports.

    Like (Post)
    For the second game I was paired with no other than Sowa (it seems that it is my fate to play against him on every tournament that I go to). Now based on our conversation he ditched Miser and took more reliable Scourge + Sentinel duo. Quote from DL:…
  • FallibleCanine -

    Replied to the thread The "There are no stupid questions" thread! Ask anything.

    Post
    Quote from Nesro: “you got something wrong:They have innate armor 2 Heavy armor 2 Shield 1 Thats it for an armor of 5 or an armor save of 2+. There is no such thing as a "warhorse" armor bonus. This is now build into the "arm" statline. Im addition, it…
  • FallibleCanine -

    Liked Nesro’s post in the thread The "There are no stupid questions" thread! Ask anything.

    Like (Post)
    Quote from FallibleCanine: “Thanks! One other question based on reading their statline, this time about armo(u)r: So they've got innate armor 2, +2 for heavy armor, +1 for shield, +2 for warhorse, for a total of 7 So innate armor 2 --> 5+ save Heavy…
  • Danrakh -

    Liked Lakson’s post in the thread DH 2.2 General discussion..

    Like (Post)
    In our book I really like the fact if someone likes big blocks, can play big blocks, someone likes msu, can play msu. A gunline, maybe? Sure why not. Lets do a gunline list. So you like to fight in t2 with all your units? Here you go sir! Lets try full
  • Danrakh -

    Liked Ironclad’s post in the thread DH 2.2 General discussion..

    Like (Post)
    Quote from Happy Aspid: “Quote from Ironclad: “I know this is hard because then you actually have to start to think but I promise that it will be much more rewarding and constructive. For me a dwarf army must have: Heavy armored infantry Beards Good…
  • Danrakh -

    Liked Happy Aspid’s post in the thread DH 2.2 General discussion..

    Like (Post)
    Quote from Ironclad: “ I know this is hard because then you actually have to start to think but I promise that it will be much more rewarding and constructive. For me a dwarf army must have: Heavy armored infantry Beards Good craftsmanship and magical…
  • Nesro -

    Replied to the thread The "There are no stupid questions" thread! Ask anything.

    Post
    Quote from FallibleCanine: “Thanks! One other question based on reading their statline, this time about armo(u)r: So they've got innate armor 2, +2 for heavy armor, +1 for shield, +2 for warhorse, for a total of 7 So innate armor 2 --> 5+ save Heavy…
  • Danrakh -

    Liked Redbeard’s post in the thread DH 2.2 General discussion..

    Like (Post)
    i agree, i dislike the approach of "this isnt dwarish enough for me cause auf X Y Z reasons"... that might be you and while everyone is entiteld to an opinion, bringing it forward to strongly will lead to taking away from others. i completly support
  • Danrakh -

    Liked Ironclad’s post in the thread DH 2.2 General discussion..

    Like (Post)
    This focus of what dwarfs can’t have must stop! We should try to agree instead of what a Dwarf army must have. If we always say dwarfs can’t have that, it will be impossible to create a balanced army that can play at all skill levels and be fun for…
  • Danrakh -

    Liked kgkid’s post in the thread DH 2.2 General discussion..

    Like (Post)
    It is not the only way, but it is a way many find good and useful. Why would you limit it? Because someone complained that they think their opponent should not be able to play the game? If that's what you're doing, man you are basing it all on wrong…
  • FallibleCanine -

    Replied to the thread The "There are no stupid questions" thread! Ask anything.

    Post
    Thanks! One other question based on reading their statline, this time about armo(u)r: So they've got innate armor 2, +2 for heavy armor, +1 for shield, +2 for warhorse, for a total of 7 So innate armor 2 --> 5+ save Heavy armor --> 3+ Shield -->…
  • Danrakh -

    Liked Cam’s post in the thread DH 2.2 General discussion..

    Like (Post)
    I'd be pretty gutted with min size 20 warriors. But I expect things and playstyles to be removed for no real reason.
  • FallibleCanine -

    Liked WarX’s post in the thread The "There are no stupid questions" thread! Ask anything.

    Like (Post)
    @FallibleCanine You are right. Grails have million attacks. But this is also most expensive unit in whole T9A! All Lance Formation knights fight in 3 ranks and in 4th if charging. You must entered combat by charging (also via pursuit or overrun) to be…
  • WarX -

    Replied to the thread VS LAB Alpha Rules Queries.

    Post
    Quote from Boo_619: “If a unit uses flying movement to move over a unit of rat swarms, does that unit suffer the hits from the swarms if it doesn’t end on top of them? ” Nope. Flying means you do not interact with stuff you fly over. Only when you…
  • WarX -

    Replied to the thread The "There are no stupid questions" thread! Ask anything.

    Post
    @FallibleCanine You are right. Grails have million attacks. But this is also most expensive unit in whole T9A! All Lance Formation knights fight in 3 ranks and in 4th if charging. You must entered combat by charging (also via pursuit or overrun) to be…