Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 915.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • Quote from Izomov: “Quote from Slayer Zabojcow: “Of course you pay points for ability to heal, but this ability shouldn't be triggered for free, just look at the VC and how they do it ” Maon difference being we raise a handful of wounds (pre-nerf) while VC raises 10s. Which is fine, VC is quantity, UD should be quality. ” But it isnt quality right? Its just an addition to the normal spell. I was thinking if there could perhaps be added some type of change to how the hereditary works once the LAB…

  • Quote from Kanadian: “So we are thinking of making Brazen Beasts, at the moment just one unit for DL. We want it to share the model with WoDG Choosen knight mount. This is what we have made. What do you think? There is a mounting place for saddle just above front shoulders. As to the look of the deamon, we are still in process of choosing a style. 70206604_388514412068478_376313146006044672_n.jpg ” looks great, is there more angles?

  • once the update hit for us is there any chance that we could gather what questions we have about the changes and send them to RT?

  • Quote from matrim: “Well good news is we're already in the bottom. You can't sink any further just get comfortable with the muck around you ” 53f.png Joking ofc

  • Thanks a lot @skipschnit we know you worked hard.

  • Quote from cptcosmic: “Quote from arwaker: “Well, what would be "fair"? There is nothing to measure fairness except balance. Cross-army comparisons make no sense. Therefore, when external balance shows HE after the patch in mid tier AND KoR still used in a desirable amount, it is fair. ” fair means that cost to performance ration is on point. rate of use has zero relation to the cost to performance ratio, it indicates how well it fares in comparision with alternatives in the same book. hence why…

  • I honestly thinks its great, it looks wicked and in a sick kinda way. If we are gonna attack anything creative then I will dust of the old "Lemures and Myrmidons" are unfit as daemon names and dont forgett about stiff upper lip!!

  • Quote from IoRi78: “Quote from Manxol: “Wereas in other moments I have feeled like community opinion has had impact, it is discouraging to hear how things are now. Not as community driven project as I have liked. ” the problem is: what a single comunity want is good for the game in general? Or will bring ripples that will bring problem in all the game?RT position is not easy, they will have to make choice that have a spectrum more wide of a single comunity. Is difficult to accept but if the game…

  • Tbh id rather see that things are too expensive once gold hits but that the design is interesting. Points can be tweaked over the eons. Rules will be forever like the laws of physics

  • Quote from IoRi78: “we have at max an other round of changes but this one should be traeted as the last before gold IF not gold. ExB want to close book to concentrate on the next. Characters problem is an other matter, but asking them to accept a huge change in units will be very difficult and will imply nerf in other units, because the power level of the army is what they want. ” Yeah I agree about the powerlevel Is there a chance that the nerfs could be implemented in the form of price increas…

  • Quote from IoRi78: “no, is improbable that they will allow changes with unforseen resoult at this stage. For RT the army is in a good spot and is acceptable that some unit will be balanced by price respect design ” Sad to hear but I understand. Thanks for the hard work but that doesnt sound exciting to say the least. Has there been any discussion about the problem with character builds and what we can see as being a trend in builds with >2 manifestations being the norm?

  • Quote from IoRi78: “Quote from Alexwellace: “Quote from IoRi78: “the solution is points, sadly. They will adjust them untill they are ok for the eliteness of the unit. Personally I don't agree with that method, but this how things works ” A points decrease won't make Imps interesting, with their low mobility, low ranged impact and non-existent combat applications. A point decrease won't make Flies a unit with a clear design goal, it'll just push them towards being another gimicky Str 4 multiatta…

  • Quote from panterq: “Quote from Kapten Kluns: “points has nothing to do with eliteness.What you are asking for is effeciency. ” The way I see it, eliteness^TM factor for Warriors with Favours is increased Correct - Warrior with a favour has more of the eliteness^TM factor than the one without it Correct. If due to the points' cost of the favour I choose to not take said favour, I'm reducing the overall eliteness^TM factor of my models due to the points Incorrect according to how the project sees…

  • Quote from Exalted Champion: “If special rules matter, then almost every unit is elite. As someone made a list here some posts ago where is shown that almost every core unit has various special rules. ” Its the sum of the components compared to what else is out there. However still independent of points

  • Quote from Herminard: “Also - et tu eh @Kapten Kluns - lets have a horn sometime when our paths cross. ” Sounds like a good evening imo.

  • Quote from panterq: “@DanT Nice, I got my fix, your witty comeback (Eliteness^TM) What I am trying to point out for the whole time, what @jirga and few others seem to understand, is that "elite" statline in a vacuum does not carry "elite" feeling into actual scenarios on the battlefield. Warriors' shiny armours gets outshined easily by a mob of greenskins with pointy sticks. My last post, listing price options for some of the favour choices, tries to merit that with current pricing, you can't ge…

  • Quote from Jadeeyes: “Too many things have to be CHANGED and revisited, rathen that point changed. Think of DL and WOTDG. They are NEW codexex, completely revisited and now they are OP. We just to have to wait until the rules guys will SEE that some things have to be implemented and changed for OK and other armies. ” Arent OK in the same tier as those OP armies?

  • Or perhaps let the world burn? Nerf the eliteness of every upcoming AB by a similar amount as what has been done here. Decrease stats quite harshly and make builds for characters less complex by dropping layers to a single one. Ofc options elsewhere in the armies needs to increase. Fair should be fair if we are talking about equal treatments.

  • Personally I believe that the rule freeze was a smart move for the game. I believe that it is great that ID and DE gets the new approach. Sadly DL wasnt able to get in on that thanks to the project maturing over time. I Think that the design team has done good with what guidelines were given to them. Sadly those guidelines were really bad and not run through the community prior to realising them. AWSW heavily ignored the communitys wishes gathered from the poll and even went straight against the…

  • Quote from Marcos24: “Well peasants are still peasants so I we know the feeling ” Talking about the entire army on avarage.