Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 84.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • Quote from Teowulff: “@Vespacian Shouldn't there be a new Sticky Thread called "HbE 2.1 Release - Show us your Lists"? ” He can or the original poster can also just change the title to 2.1. (or anybody with mod powers here, unfortunately I don't have those in this part of the forum)

  • Quote from Blonde Beer: “Quote from Zyonn: “@Blonde Beer I really can understand your frustration. It must be hard to be confronted that much with the negativity of an entire forum. And I mean what I say, no jokes or sarcasm included. But maybe you can try to switch positions and have a view at the entire problem from the perspective of HBE players. I think it is understandable that players lost faith in the results of fixes because the last updates had really dramatic impacts on HBE. Making the…

  • Quote from Giladis: “@jaith1 Agreed but at the same time I don't see the need for it to be represented via special rules when the unit already has S4 GW and striking at their normal Agi. ” Wouldn't be surprised if they either represent further with special rules or they re-discuss the differentiation conceptual wise on Sword Masters vs Lion Guard vs Flame Wardens. At the same time you are right. It could stay as is, but in my opinion the units are still too close to each other.

  • Quote from Giladis: “@ferny or they could loose their monster hunting capabilities to be more true to their T9A concept. ” Quote from Masamune88: “@ferny we had this fight in the 2.0 rejig. BGT has LG as a hero cult of guardians for the throne and FW as quasi priests/monks. Unlikely to change unless BGT is willing to change direction and fluff that they have already created. ” I am looking forward how the BGT - RT - LAB Team Design Guidelines discussions will go on this topic. RT wants more diff…

  • Quote from Aenarion43: “Hello, all. I came back to playing to a SPECTACULAR loss on my part against a friend of mine in a casual game (Ogres vs. HbE at 4500). This was mainly my fault to due poor play and lack of practice (and I got some good feedback on what to work on). The game included MANY moments (I think 1 per turn) that included some variation of: - "But Highborn Elves get 'x', and that's very powerful" - Actually, no. It's x minus y. - "Oh, wow. That's a lot worse than I thought it was"…

  • Quote from Fnarrr: “If I was on a LAB team I wouldn't be on the public forums as much, as my attention would be occupied elsewhere ” Hence my absense for the past 6(12?) months restructuring T9a and creating the Infernal Dwarves book with two of the best teams. It could hint that I am not that needed anymore. Quote from Fnarrr: “But it would be like that episode of Malcolm in the Middle when Reese quits being a bully and the school descends into chaos. ” At least I am sure my absence didn't make…

  • First thing I see after a long time being here is @Klexe and @Fnarrr having a "good" discussion. Never change, but keep it nice and civil. Quote from Furion: “@Masamune88 @Vespacian @Henrypmiller I offer to help you with making the patch better. I want to have more HBE builds possible. As I will provide feedback on internal balance, there is no risk that my informed opinion will spoil the power level of the entire game. I want to help you to deliver a good working product. Is there any way someo…

  • I am looking forward to Amsterdam and can be your tour guide if needed! I think there are more people from the area like @There Is No Spoon and @Pellegrim. Quote from Fthunder: “Quote from Herminard: “I will not haggle the cost - it costs what it costs and it is western europe. I fully trust Frederick in .. this specific regard. I will however share the sentinent that it would be nice to have food and drinks as a separate option if at all possible. If it is not - then so be it. Not a deal breake…

  • Quote from Calisson: “I thought that Homebrew could be an inspiration for all the ID LAB team, not only art. ” Quote from Windelov: “Hi @Ghiznuk and @Calisson this is in the hands of the background and art team. I can have all sorts of ideas for how we could incorporate it but whether I can use any of it is really not for me to decide. @Scottish Knight @Niedfaru and @WhammeWhamme are the guys to go to ” Quote from Ghiznuk: “Yeah, that's why I tagged them. I don't know why Calisson added you. ” B…

  • Quote from Edhelnaur: “Quote from Emgies: “The idea is to do data driven point adjustment through algorithms in the future on a frequent basis. ” Through algorithms using which data ? This is interesting, but does the algo will calculate only on the characteristics of the unit ? or in their result in game ? how does the algorithms will consider options like scout or vanguard (non-offensive/défensive skills). I agree that it will certainly be the most efficient way to balance everything.How advan…

  • The idea is to do data driven point adjustment through algorithms in the future on a frequent basis.

  • National forum for Chile

    Emgies - - Website Helpdesk

    Post

    Not entirely sure why I am tagged here. But this is probably something for ACS and Community Engagement @Just_Flo @IoRi78 @SirMC2015 @Henrypmiller.

  • I feel your magic is very limited with 3 spells + H. The enemy almost is guaranteed to dispell the most important spell at that moment making the other 2 sort of useless.

  • Request

    Emgies - - General Discussion

    Post

    I personally agree and think the blogs of @Randomus (Abrasus), @Furion and @SmithF would be great additions. At least a link to it. Currently they are located in The Hobby Hub > User Blogs or Blogs. A setup could be Tactics: - General Q&A - Blogs - Army A - Army B ... The problem is that if you have too many categories on your forum you have too much overlap and choice. For example with Battle Reports, User Blogs, General Discussion, Rules Questions & Answers etc. BUT, This is not my "pakkie jan…

  • I hope people don’t mind we play with the new Infernal Dwarves unreleased rules. @Frederick confirmed they looked fine. I think this is a big step forward so we can do data-driven design and balancing. The problem we had before is when a Legendary Army Book was released we didn’t have enough playtesting data. Since the new structure I am very happy that we can test the armies, even on big tournaments like WTC.

  • My people also wanted to order the 4th anniversary edition, because it’s the latest according to upload date. Not by the title. At leas that was the reason for them.

  • Quote from Furion: “Quote from Kopistar: “you guys know that what we had for the last update was point drop and ONLY drop (no units or whatsoever got his pts increased) ??? Yet where do we stand in the power ladder ? ” That's the worst misconception of them all.That boosting units that are unplayable makes the army stronger overall. No, it makes an army more interesting to play. And that's that. ” There is a difference between EXTERNAL balance and INTERNAL balance. That's what @Furion just expla…

  • ADT is well aware of what works in design and what design is acceptable by point cost. If we aren’t sure we will ask either ourselves or through ACS.

  • Uhm... If you would make both Frost Phoenix and Griffon 75pts cheaper everyone would play them. Maybe the design of the Frost Phoenix isn’t perfect, but it is playable with the right point cost. In the end when the Slim book hits Legendary, the army gets build from the ground up again looking at the goals of an army or entry and non-coherent designs will be redesigned from the ground up or maybe even merged or replaced with another design. That’s what we are doing now at Infernal Dwarves.

  • Quote from Furion: “It's a real shame that books were put in the "gold status". There should be at least once a year balance update. ” There are (going to be) balance updates at least once a year... This includes slim and legendary books. Currently all legendary books that have been made are still in beta so they also receive design updates. Slim books will only receive balance updates.