Search Results

Quote from Dancaarkiiel: “ Speaking of, a friend of mine has come up with an interesting build for a Wizard Warlord: 605 Warlord: Raptor, GW, Death Cheater, Crown of the Wizard King, Sun Tablet Can't wait to test this bad boy out ” This warlord is brilliant! Must try! Also @Eymuster I think the BSB with 1+/1+ you talk about can be good, but it depends on the rest of your list. I think you mention the biggeste pros and cons of him. Personally I like special save better, since that "can" save him …

@Zamo Do you have link to the video? Could be interesting to hear. Having seen his list, I would love to hear this own thoughts about it. My own strongest list with SA is completely different, so would be fun to hear how he makes everything works. Also, the 3 spanish SA lists look a lot alike, but still different. However, there seem to be many points in difference in the results. Probably playerskill & match up's were the important factor? And/or some key units/entires in difference?

When is next episode out?

Where can lists be seen?

Quote from Aeon: “Also the playstyle of SA do not encourage taking risk to win 20-0 because you give so much for chaffing or counter charge, that this is really hard to perform. So i don't think i learn that much but having EVERYSINGLE person telling you that every match up of the tournament is bad for SA discourage me a lot. ” I get What you are saying, but looking at results from Big tourneys, there are a least 2 international players who are able to score big with SA. I still think SA are a L…

I think its kinda cool, but you need to practise against it. Also, it is strong when it starts the game with two portals in the game. If you want to do something, just make it slightly more expensive to start the game with 2 portals instead of redesigning the whole thing. I don't play it, but have played many games against it. It takes some time to figure out.

Quote from Pellegrim: “Quote from Soldaan: “The problem with them is their agility. Most times they are dead before they are able to strike themselves... ” So you can't charge them into anything without thinking. Which is a good thing imo. And the low agi is partially compensated by they have a 2+ armour save. ” you mean a 2+ save just like every other heavy cavalry model? You really need a plan with them. 2+ AS doesnt help them that much, but it sure is better than something lower, but orcs hav…

Quote from Red88: “Baby Carno General Skink Captain Taurosaur BSB Engine SKink Priest Drudism ” How will the item setup be?

Quote from Eymuster: “Quote from Palinux: “Frustration that putting the vets on Raptors seems like a much cheaper and better solution: 445pts Veteran, Battle Standard Bearer, Great Weapon, Raptor, Basalt Infusion, Talisman of Shielding ” planning on using same bsb layout to tournament, or:Veteran, BSB, Raptor, shield, lance, dragonfire gem, dusk forged Less useful against tougher targets or ap10, but more grindy against anything less than ap4. Supernatural dexterity will also fit this for hittin…

Frustration that putting the vets on Raptors seems like a much cheaper and better solution: 445pts Veteran, Battle Standard Bearer, Great Weapon, Raptor, Basalt Infusion, Talisman of Shielding 410pts Veteran, Great Weapon, Raptor, Death Cheater

You are probably right. Lance and Shield it is. Will also make it possible to have potion of Strength on Quatl

Quote from Dancaarkiiel: “Quote from Palinux: “The idea is that with 3+ AS he is not super vulnerable against Alchemy. With 2+ AS he is. I was thinking that GW was better for the grind. I have played him once against alchemy with 2+ AS 4+ Fort and I really regretted taking the shield on him. But was just one game and with only one carno. Don't know if 3+AS 4+ Fort is enough with double heal to keep him going, but lance is just so bad for second round combat.. ” So you decided to make him a littl…

Quote from Pinktaco: “switch to shield and lance for better protection? ” The idea is that with 3+ AS he is not super vulnerable against Alchemy. With 2+ AS he is. I was thinking that GW was better for the grind. I have played him once against alchemy with 2+ AS 4+ Fort and I really regretted taking the shield on him. But was just one game and with only one carno. Don't know if 3+AS 4+ Fort is enough with double heal to keep him going, but lance is just so bad for second round combat..

Can this work? The 2 Carno build seems interesting and at least worth trying. 770 pts Cuatl Lord, General, Grasp of the Immortal, Protean Potentate, Jade Staff, Rod of Battle 570 pts, Saurian Veteran, BSB, Lance, Shield, Carnosaur, Basalt Infusion, Talisman of Shielding 545 pts, Saurian Veteran, Great Weapon, Carnosaur, Death Cheater Combine with Stygio and Traveller? Only works in 5000 pts. I 4500 maybe just ditch the Jade staff and Rod of Battle. to stay under 1800 pts.

Quote from Dancaarkiiel: “Most of the time S3 shooting doesn't really have a good target. Now it does. Really makes you think ” This is the essence, but then again. SKinks are cheap internally, but externally they seem really expensive. Quote from Dancaarkiiel: “ Also actual options would be nice - Paired Weapons, Spears, Poison, Battle Focus, whatever. Flavor-wise all of those are easily justifiable. ” This could be super nice. Poison they can already have, but paired weapons and spears could b…

I tried Scaimen for a few games. Going back to Saurus. also tried the Thyro. Switched it out to 5 Raptors with Musician. Same price, but the Raptors have scoring, faster and actually have some output. Thyro seems way worse than Raptors, and Raptors are far from the strongest choice.

Quote from Red88: “Essence Divi/Alch + Stygio + Tauro/Engine + Master of Reality + Symbiosis * Talisman of the Void + Magical Heirloom + Rending + Banner of the relentless + Temple Guard ==> best for me ” You really need Divination and Alchemy? Which matchup needs Alchemy? KoE?

Quote from MountainBuns: “Oh man I agree with you whole heartedly. I wish the project had it in their man hour budget for a small design change balance update but I’ve been repeatedly told by many people on the team that points changes are the name of the game right now until lab. It’s so unfortunate but why fight the system when you can work within its bounds? Since lab is several years from now I would suggest if we are unhappy with a current unit to just push reasonable price changes that wou…

Quote from MountainBuns: “ Design changes are fun to think about but they are lame because they hold no sway at this point in time. A well placed buff in points can make an entry go from terrible to good. ” You mean that there should only be point changes, because LAB might come around in a few years? I know this 2.1 was only for points, but I think minor design changes could easily benefit the game and armybooks, if there was a will to do it. I think its better for the unit to have good functio…

Quote from Red88: “i think with d3 stomps he coulb be on Point ” Carno or Thyro? Or both?