Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 877.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • DL 2.3 Feedback thread

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from AlexCat: “Quote from IoRi78: “ok guys, did you see the discount in the new update? ” Yep.Nice corrections. Won't help Courtesan and Miser though in my opinion. But good work on other units. ” this turn is only a point adjustment, changes in rules are still in discussion.

  • DL 2.3 Feedback thread

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    ok guys, did you see the discount in the new update?

  • DL 2.3. Question to RT

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from saldiven: “And this is illustrative of one of the biggest complaints about how the RT assigns points. They assume that players commonly taking a unit or unit options is because that unit/option is good. Sometimes, it's just the best of a bad lot (lots of examples). Other times, it's the only option (Furies are the only real chaff unit because they are the only relatively cheap unit that can fly). ” is not a question. Please post in the feedback thread this feedback. Thanks

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Eldan: “Quote from IoRi78: “Quote from Kodos der Henker: “To the game, not the models (they are still there in AoS) ” and t9a have take away some model? Or have given you a way to play your model with a set of rules that continue in a way we all loved for years? ” Ikit Claw, Thanquoal, Throt the Unclean, Tretch Craventail, tunnel teams, scientist moulders, suicide bomber slaves, rocket engineers... all don't have rules anymore. ” you have all rapresentative in vs army. You want the st…

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Kodos der Henker: “To the game, not the models (they are still there in AoS) ” and t9a have take away some model? Or have given you a way to play your model with a set of rules that continue in a way we all loved for years?

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Fergus: “Quote from Kodos der Henker: “Quote from IoRi78: “a broader appeal in what? Unfair games? Selling the last model relesed?Really, why? Why are you asking to be screwed again and again by someone who care about you only for the money you can spend? Why you want to just a customer? ” Main reason why people don't care for the rules as long as it is GW?Cause it is an easy and save investment. Spending 600€ for an Army and time painting it for a game you are not sure it is still th…

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Kodos der Henker: “Quote from IoRi78: “a broader appeal in what? Unfair games? Selling the last model relesed?Really, why? Why are you asking to be screwed again and again by someone who care about you only for the money you can spend? Why you want to just a customer? ” Main reason why people don't care for the rules as long as it is GW? Cause it is an easy and save investment. Spending 600€ for an Army and time painting it for a game you are not sure it is still there in a year or yo…

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Peacemaker: “Quote from Fergus: “So does this news clip from Games Workshop mean that we won’t have to wait 8 years for all the 2nd Edition FAB’s to be completed? ” Oh, I think GW will churn out those army books in record time! In all of their unedited, alpha tested glory. ” we all remember the beutifull work of 6th ed dark elf, or the 8th edition Bretonnian and Skaven books.

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Kristian: “Quote from IoRi78: “Quote from Kristian: “I really doubt 9th age would survive direct competition from GW. They do everything better. But it still remains to be seen if the game will be like old warhammer or something new. ” please, you really think that GW rules were/are better than t9a rules?Sorry but why are you here and not playing AoS? ” because AoS is not a rank and file game.Because GW wrote rules that had a much broader appeal than 9th age... ” a broader appeal in w…

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Kristian: “I really doubt 9th age would survive direct competition from GW. They do everything better. But it still remains to be seen if the game will be like old warhammer or something new. ” please, you really think that GW rules were/are better than t9a rules? Sorry but why are you here and not playing AoS?

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    they buyed us, and now all tags are rich

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    I still laughs my sides at GW way of doing affair. What else it is, is only 4 years late.

  • DL 2.3. Question to RT

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from AlexCat: “Quote: “Ok, with that out of the way, let me try to explain why I personally find it more useful to understand root cause issues than potential solution. It's easier for people to agree what a problem is than to agree what to do about it. Once the problem is agreed on one can try to fond solution that fixes the exact problem, with minimal collateral. It's also easier to find solution that are aligned with other restrictions that might be put on you. This doesn't mean that su…

  • DL 2.3. Question to RT

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from Dragus: “I found too much problematic opponents with 3x Aether icon + obsidian rock in a heavy bunker. 2x binding scroll is even more anoying. I think those magic items should be at a higher point cost. Iron husk feels good for some army entries (maw, herald) but too useless in the rest of the cases. I suggest replacing it with "aether husk: +1 aegis, against magical attacks". This even could be given to some unit entries, and could have guiding version. Eidolons are a mess. They don'…

  • DL 2.3 Feedback thread

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from teclis2000: “Quote from IoRi78: “6 fiends with reroll to sound against 8 minotaur with Shield. Fiends do 18 attacks at 3. 12 hits 12 to wounds with reroll are 11 to 12 hp lost. Minotaur are 12 attacks to hit at 4 with reroll: 9 hits 9 to wound at 3 are 6 hp. 6 save at 5 are 4 hp lost. Fiends win by 8. ” You forgot Battle Focus, but with 12 hits it doesn't change much... even not if one mor minotaur survives. On the other hand minos are vulnerable to an kind of attacks. ” you are right

  • DL 2.3. Question to RT

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    @AlFiKa @skipschnit @Kolata @nightwun

  • DL 2.3 Feedback thread

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from skrak: “Doing some calculations. 5 fiends unhiging jaw 550 pts vs 6 wretched ones 540 pts. Round 1 First fiends charge and swing on 2+ 3+ rerolling. Deal 7.5 wounds on average, not bad. Then wretched ones (which are broken in my opinion) deal 6d6+6 str4 autohits, dealing 8,5 wounds on average. They dont care if they lose the round. Round 2 3 fiends (7 wounds) vs 4 wretched ones (11 wounds). Fiends swing first dealing 4,5 wounds. Then wretched ones swing 4d6+4 autohits dealing 5,5 woun…

  • DL 2.3 Feedback thread

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    6 fiends with reroll to sound against 8 minotaur with Shield. Fiends do 18 attacks at 3. 12 hits 12 to wounds with reroll are 11 to 12 hp lost. Minotaur are 12 attacks to hit at 4 with reroll: 9 hits 9 to wound at 3 are 6 hp. 6 save at 5 are 4 hp lost. Fiends win by 8.

  • Now I remembered why we banned mercenaries armies when I was head of Figw

  • yes gw bg is death in the moment they detonate the old world to substitute it with realmgate. And pigrizia is different from accidia. Pigrizia is to have desire, but no will to achieve them Accidia is to not have any desire at all