Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 1,000. There are more results available, please enhance your search parameters.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • Makhar has some of errors. Book is now gold and so only point costs will change in the future. Enaree should be renamed to Taltos. Error flag on maximum Character allowance is off. Makhar Lancers have no Shield option, Lamellar Barding is too cheap.

  • Makhar Discussion

    Krokz - - Makhar

    Post

    Quote from Warshout: “It seems that the Fist of the Makhar update removed the Aim (4+) though... ” Oops, nice one. @Eru

  • Makhar Discussion

    Krokz - - Makhar

    Post

    Yeah under downloads the file was updated. It is pre-gold now, just fixing typos and turning all text to black in next version. So community, help us find typos and errors

  • Quote from namadeva: “Good question that brings another one: what is the fluff difference between hellforged and infernal armors? ” @Scottish Knight A christmass question

  • But is is official? If ETC accepts it or not is in the hands of ETC captains, they decide what is played on ETC.

  • Yes, that is my point. There is no fear that Giant will die in the first round of combat. He will most likely be ran down after failing a Break test.

  • Quote from Nasion "Demon": “So he provides bonuses and punch agains monsters and block of units without being killed in first round of combat. ” I played Giant in a unit in 10+ games and not even once did enemy allocate any attacks onto him. I would not either if I was on opposite side.

  • WDG Giant is 260 points (in WDG, check prices in other books) for a below average Monster with relatively good AWSR - Battle Fever. It is still a Monster, Terror and big Stomps. If we are talking how this price point still isn't making it internally attractive this only speaks how competitive the book really is.

  • Makhar Discussion

    Krokz - - Makhar

    Post

    Did you think I count in Makhar calendar?

  • Tournaments

    Krokz - - Asklanders

    Post

    Quote from Blonde Beer: “Because its on my to do list for 2020. Get some real data tracking going and playtesting and wrap it up. ” Some people will never be satisfied unless the book is approved by ETC captains. So, should it be brought up? :p

  • Makhar Discussion

    Krokz - - Makhar

    Post

    Quote from Tec43: “When is the book expected to go into Gold? ” This year.

  • At the stage of development Gold books are, the only reason for lowering price for a certain unit is: it is not being used in lists and army at the same time is externally not top tier. No theory, no comparing to units from other armies needed. That is reality. Of course you can debate why something has different price than other comparable unit in other army book, but that is just a debate for the sake of debate can't stop you from heaving fun straining your brain cells

  • @TheGodOfCakes I am afraid I can't answer to any of those questions. Book is gold, done, and it will only get price changes maybe once a year.

  • Patch 2.2 Feedback

    Krokz - - Vampire Covenant (VC)

    Post

    Quote from Wesser: “Double Horror is match dependant. I have never seen a valid argument why a Zombie Dragon makes its worse. ” 3 flying Monsters are definitively more RPS then two Flying monsters. Even the fix targeted that exact thing, to quote patch notes written in the Army book: should be impossible to have 3 gigantic flyers.

  • Not planing it in a foreseeable future.

  • Patch 2.2 Feedback

    Krokz - - Vampire Covenant (VC)

    Post

    Quote from Wesser: “Dude we’re on the same team here... but stop calling the Triple bat extreme, when no data in the world supports it ” I am calling it extreme RPS match dependent, not extremely strong to dominate tournaments. Data has nothing to do with it.

  • Patch 2.2 Feedback

    Krokz - - Vampire Covenant (VC)

    Post

    Quote from Rellzed: “Sorry, but if a RPS build it's not strong you should permit it to exist. ” Depends on the level of extreme nature of the RPS build. We want lists to be more well rounded so it is skill that wins the game and winning is less match up dependent. Of course this does not mean we go to the other end of extreme, T9A still has some RPS match ups, but we are trying to curve extremes like we did in last patch with changing 3xFlying monsters for VC and Essence in Arcane Compendium. If…

  • Patch 2.2 Feedback

    Krokz - - Vampire Covenant (VC)

    Post

    Quote from eggsPR: “You say people don’t like to have a bad or boring game against triple flying monsters. Well, tell that to guy who sent my ZD into a dead pile and screamed in joy while doing 20 push-ups in excitement after my binding scrolls ran out... I was laughing too, so it was a FUN time! ” You are just proving our point of why this was deemed too RPS. We don't want games to be that one sided - definition of RPS. Game must be fun for both players. Quote from eggsPR: “Some EEs weighed VC …

  • Patch 2.2 Feedback

    Krokz - - Vampire Covenant (VC)

    Post

    Quote from Just_Flo: “For an explanation which shows all aspects in minimum depth I would say 5 till 10 sentences per RT member. ” Well truth is not all have changes and not all are meaningful. It would help if next time the lockup/gold patch isn't a big one, but as small as possible after community feedback. I believed this worked great last cycle. @fjugin

  • Patch 2.2 Feedback

    Krokz - - Vampire Covenant (VC)

    Post

    Quote from eggsPR: “Was the expert feedback on VC being #3 clouded by thinking the tournies skies would be ruled by 3x flying monsters? 1000000% yes... ” This is not true, at least I didn't vote against this because of external balance problem, but because of RPS nature such list represents and we do not want such RPS matchups in this game. All External Experts data specifically noted that this list is not problematic from external power level, but from RPS nature of matchups.