Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 917.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • Quote from Kapten Kluns: “Thanks for the update team, kinda interested in trying the eidolons now when their armour penetrering abilities arent outperformed by ap 2 units like previous. Still miss the old mobile shooting flank charger threat of old. I Think that imps sadly missed the mark since its their shooting that is off, they are still as immobile, they still lack the ability to countershoot and as thus they are a sitting duck always, they still lose combats to practicly every unit out ther…

  • New Daemon Legion ACS

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    thank you! Was really kind!

  • DL 2.3 Feedback thread

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from AlexCat: “@IoRi78 I thought they had 4 attacks and now have 2. They lost 2 attacks, or, to say, had they A value halved. You designed them, please, tell me, what kind of enemies did you aim for? To increase Flies' DPS against? And what kind of enemies you admit the DPS will be lower. The book has a hammer. The unit is called Brazen Beasts. Even thinking about comparing their DPS and Flies is hilarious. ” yes they had 4 attacks but: Against def 3/4 and R4/5 units are better than before…

  • DL 2.3 Feedback thread

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from AlexCat: “Quote from IoRi78: “we aim to give them a role, and we try to make them a hammer, which is something that the book lack. We see if it work. ” Ok, tell me how did their damage output changed? Was the intention to raise it? Did it go up? ” they lose one attack but hit better, wound better and have more ap. So depend obviously on the target but generally yes, damage is upped.

  • DL 2.3 Feedback thread

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from tulmir: “I am here to lament for the poor KOE. Apparently, toxic attacks were not enough; now we have dark fire! The best design is always to make things more anti-armour, when you run out idea, right? ” since they are designed as anti armour, yes? Quote from AlexCat: “I honestly dont understand what you did with Flies. I suspect - you too. ” we aim to give them a role, and we try to make them a hammer, which is something that the book lack. We see if it work.

  • DL 2.3 Feedback thread

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from Theokrit: “Thanks for the update. more points for general. I have to play around with that. Maybe there are some combinations with iron husk. More res for imps... makes them better at staying alive. The output is still questionable. Dark Fire: I love it and i want to keep it. As a guy that wants to play shooty daemons i say thanks. 3+ Aim 18" range eidolons seems to me the best version so far, hits on 5+ most of the time, but rewards not moving and/or dancing in close range. Bloat Fli…

  • DL 2.3 Feedback thread

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    Quote from Herlad the Herald: “Great Internal change? This is a joke right? The problem with dark fire has always been range and accuracy. I loved the last book, eidolons were great. Might as well throw them away now. Flies, so be it, would have like to have them lean more on their special rule of acid blood but they're good now. Res 3 imps!!! what time to be alive... ” eidolon accuracy is been buffed. Aim is raised to 3+ so they are more reliable at short distance

  • DL 2.3 Feedback thread

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    what make you unsure about flies? Too few attacks?

  • DL 2.3.1 version up!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    the-ninth-age.com/community/fi…dafec9e4b7399548f97c09139 Here the last update for Daemon Legion book! Spread the corruption!

  • DL 2.3 Feedback thread

    IoRi78 - - Daemon Legions (DL)

    Post

    the-ninth-age.com/community/fi…dafec9e4b7399548f97c09139 Fellow denizen of the nine circles new version of our book is up! Some good news on the horizon!

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    is a difficult argument that can spark a flammable discussion. I think that the truth is that to expand more this game should go on a complete different route than the current standard (smaller armies, not circle around tournaments, simpler rules ecc..) BUT you can not do it because in the current state without the core tournament players (ETC and WTC mainly) this game can not stand on his own. Maybe in the future it will happen and the game will splitt in two separate entities, don't know, I'm …

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    take in account that many on that forum are trolling and sadly there is not a serious discussion in years, is used mainly to publish tournaments advertise. Italian comunity is migrated in many WhatsApp groups sadly. But you are right, if you want to do a business about this game you have to take in consideration that kind of players too. Sayinf so, I personally dislike the idea that someone can make money over this project, but as EXB allow that so I can not go against their will. Is sad that so…

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from piteglio: “@infamousme - agreed. also a lower price tag (even with lower sculpt quality) might be something to explore. @Hombre de Mundo - yes, i also think the future is much more digital and individual. but as in john doc's case before, the problem always lies in recognising that you are at the forefront of change. other people, many other people, see what you talk about as science fiction. i kid you not - this very week, on a national forum, i saw a guy complaining that he couldnt …

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from Tyranno: “Quote from IoRi78: “and yet anyone can go there and change what he correct, and he have to do his work again and again and again. ” That is no longer the case. ” good, if is changed better. It was a problem and I'm glad they solve it. I just did not know that. Quote from Marcos24: “Plus references are cited ” it was not always like that?

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    and yet anyone can go there and change what he correct, and he have to do his work again and again and again. But you don't have to convince me, I respect your ideas and I'm cool if people want use it, but as long as is not handle by certified entity I would not use it as reference if I have to do a official work. Simple. I think we can all live with that and the world go on. Some of you have branded me as an elitist, and in some way I'm, but not as I think many of you intend. I want that things…

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    it's not sarcasm. I don't use wikipedia and I don't trust data taken from wikipedia. Generally I prefer check facts from books or official pages. Quote from Mercenary Armies: “Quote from IoRi78: “Quote from piteglio: “some people (like the "ignorants" mentioned by Shukran) thought Wikipedia was a silly project. some people (like you?) think that Wikipedia is a product: an online encyclopedia, maybe the best one. some people (like me) think that Wikipedia is a mode of reorganising culture, knowle…

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from piteglio: “ some people (like the "ignorants" mentioned by Shukran) thought Wikipedia was a silly project. some people (like you?) think that Wikipedia is a product: an online encyclopedia, maybe the best one. some people (like me) think that Wikipedia is a mode of reorganising culture, knowledge, society. ” some people like me don't use Wikipedia because is full of imprecision and fake or wrong entries because everyone can modify pages.

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    You could be right and I could be wrong about QS. I have a different experience about it with the italian scene, but could be a difference in the regional enviroment. I bring only what people bring me as feedback, but I'm limited from geography and time. What I like that people should understand is that we should not lower our standard in rules and complexity to gather more people only because we need people. For me we don't need people if they don't want the same thing we want when we started w…

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    I have read QS rules, did not play the game because I'm not interested, I enjoy the normal game as is. But what I stated you are the difference between QS and normal game, differences that make it a different game. T9A, for me, should be the best wargame in the world, not a revolution. You see this project as something that will shake the pillars of heaven but is a game, a elite game as is Always was, because entry level was and is elite. because to play you have to spend money, to paint you hav…

  • square bases for AoS ?!

    IoRi78 - - General Discussion

    Post

    Quote from piteglio: “@IoRi78 - as lichking said: nobody dreams of reducing complexity in FB. the QS is an additional product, not a replacement. no one thinks we should replace the champions league (ETC) with some futsal/calcetto league (QS). we're just saying that even if you don't have enough friends to build a 11-man team and dont have the money to rent out a regular stadium (FB), we can still give you something to play (QS). edit: "I don't think a thing like the QS would help people join, w…