Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 196.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • and an all knight army should be viable. Making peasants mandatory is not the way, they should be support. Nice to have but not a must.

  • Double duke is the solution for our book for everything :D. Just adjust their equipment to current meta. The more tests the new book has, the more arguments we will have to adjust later. There are powerhorses on ID just as they were on previous beta books. If anything is less broken than DL when it came out. So everything is fine, the project is improving! Just keep playing to find faster the things that have to be tuned down. I know that reading it seems everything is good, but also everything …

  • Peasant bowmen with accurate and ap arrows, poison arrows, flaming arrows, even blessed arrows. Levy with that gains blessing and + defense when in same combat as a knight Knights with 3 diferent formation Light pegasus, medium pegasus, heavy pegasus Green knight, red knight, black knight, white knight, blue knight Etc... Its not the complexity i would like for the game, but if others books complexity is following that trend, we should just do it the best we can.

  • it will be used on lugar on chariot. Especially with ocultism to get a 3++ save . Inferno miscast is not an issue when you have a T5 3++.

  • they previously had ambush. And previously weapon master and skirmish And previosly offese 5 This guys have the record.of one of the most changing unit of t9a. And whem we found something that was loved by everyone ( friends and foes! )it was removed. Just like brigands...and we had to fight to get it back.

  • im sorry but you cannot say an unit is not wanted for background reasons and the other is not wanted for balance issues. Theres room for background and balance for both units. Another thing is thst the focus of the book is another and theres no space for everything, bit then we should debate what is getting that space, because maybe bodygisrd unit is kore desired than troubador, which i dont know and should be discused. On background So our realms will not protect their duke? Or the famous palad…

  • Please, No discussion, just answer the questions on first post with your opinion. Thanks.

  • what about a wall of fog? It could block line of sight. It gets dispersed when a unit enters the fog.

  • if fly is the OP special rule, flee is the OP movement. I think MSU is not viable without fleeing. At least is surely harder to play. Do we want to limit our playstyle? And fluffwise, should a realm knight who maybe worship the lady, or it maybe only pretends to do it, not really be afraid of the abomination that is eating alive its comrades? So fearless for elites, yes. For core, not so sure about it.

  • in mi opinion, plate armour should be thw factor that could diferenciate a duke from a paladin. One should be richer, being able to have the best equipment ( plate) and maintain the more expensive mounts, royal pegasus, hippogriffs, dragons? While the other should be more humble with less resorces, relying on the common warhorse or pegasus but focused on combat and on his duty.

  • I think the focus should be on characters not on units. Characters that can have different "oaths" And depending on those oaths access to diferent favours, virtues or quests Or these being more powerful. Depending on the oath you take.

  • im with klexe here. You can make the aspirants the unit that has no helms or no simbols on theirs shields etc... Grails the ones with capes or the ones painted white... Unit with last charge is the unit with an additional banner on the second row etc... If there were a promotion on paint, sportmanship, army personalitzation etc....instead of only focus on gameplay there will be no problem in unit differenciation. I feel your pain and i know the number of invisible upgrades has to be kept in chec…

  • Im bad at names. But i thought this for Questers and maybe Grails or they could have something different. Endure Fear Models with Endure Fear that pass a Fear test gain +1 to Hit with its Close Combat attacks against the model that cause Fear while Close Combat attacks from Fear causing models allocated towards the models in the unit suffer -1 to hit. Now a 3+ save 5++ with -1 to hit doesnt sound that bad as defense...

  • What should protect our questers? If we can make the blessing progressive or triggering on feats, like when fighting a certain enemies, then you can protect questers ( or even all knights! )while their are on their intented / quest target. Then theres the skill, questers should know when to use thier sword two handed or when its better to use their shield. As a knight of the realm should know when its better to use their lance or their cavalry sword / morning star And finally theres the quest pe…

  • A bastard sword is superior to all weapons in game. Maybe with the expetion of a plague flail. And imo is not needed. It was the bandaid to make questers viable. Another direction could have been taken: R4 2A Plate armour Better blessing Etc... Some of them conflicted with eliteness of grails and touching grails was not desired. When we do lab this will not be a problem as all units will move from their current status. Also is not an accurate solution. For example i very rarely use the light lan…

  • Quote from SirVelinn: “@Kratos, I liked most of the ideas, but as I understand..in your book. Blessing is lot when you are shaken. So characters or units that fail a charge get to loose the blessing??...eso no mola ” yep. You are shaken when you fail a charge. But only until end of turn. So opponent cannot benefit from it, because at their turn, you are no longer shaken. Maybe the wording is not right. The idea is the blessing does not work while you are shaken. So the lady punishes you if you f…

  • Quote from Grouchy Badger: “Speaking of alternative weapons, why don't peasants get poison shot? You would think peasants would know a thing or two about swirling their arrows in a slurry of [Redacted For The Nobility] and whip it at the enemy.. ” Peasants must be a support element. Take in mind how where designed in GW. On 6th edition WFB, they got flamming shoots to be able to get regen out FOR THE REST OF THE GAME so knights could charge trolls and hydras without having to get it regrow. Now …

  • Btw, as we are brainstorming as always i will drop some gems here to see what you think. Im trying to build a book with a RPG mindset, of synergy between units and characters to make characters shine instead of making units shine ( thats EoS ). This allows me to keep characters human, but being able to get elite enough when inspired together for doing the specified task. Impetuous Models with this rule gain Devastating Charge( Fearless), +2″ Advance Rate when rolling for Charge Range and Frenzy …

  • ooook we get the point. Can we please focus again on the 5 things you feel are important for KoE?

  • Brainstorm idea. From less elite to more: - Mounted Scouts( yeomen without shield) - Mounted Men at arms ( yeomen with shield and light armour but not light troops ) - Realm Knight( lance or morning star ) - Penitent Knight( questers, different weapons no lance ) - Templar Knight( grails stats, lance shield) - Guardian Knight( grails with 2hp, sword shield ) Crusader: Impetuous and Devcharge( +1 ) Could be a magic standard or unit upgrade. Or all list( forcing some units to be crusaders) or an u…