Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 1,000. There are more results available, please enhance your search parameters.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • With a pyro adept and the shooting yeah I think he'll be gone in 2 turns. Especially as the shooters can effectively march into him and be chaff while shooting him.

  • Still need to test, worried he will be gone in 2 turns with pyro but smashing/monster seeker combo he could delete a tank very quickly. So hard to judge so want to try it out before commenting!

  • DH Balistas for dropping monsters Cannons for tanks (but not good if they have a flying monster cause mask) Kings Guard Catapults Miners Dont work Hold Guardians (Rockets) Copter (Rockets, flaming aegis) Small arms shooting, especially crossbows Seekers (so much ranged)

  • Quote from Traumdieb: “Quote from Cam: “Taurukh are in a spot where they aren’t monstrous cav or infantry. Therefore are hard to get right. In general I don’t know why you’d ever put the commissioner in a unit over running him as a single model anyway. 360 for 3 with GW and shield is probably decent anti monster threat so I think taurukh can work. Just haven’t seen or tried them yet. ” From my experience they work at five with Shield (+ IW is better).3 can be ok but are outshinned by other units…

  • Taurukh are in a spot where they aren’t monstrous cav or infantry. Therefore are hard to get right. In general I don’t know why you’d ever put the commissioner in a unit over running him as a single model anyway. 360 for 3 with GW and shield is probably decent anti monster threat so I think taurukh can work. Just haven’t seen or tried them yet.

  • ID General Chat

    Cam - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Sure the dwarf one I stubborn so you have to kill it. But a lot of the time you get a free reform in the DH players turn which is spicy.

  • @KrogGar, why should the bull (who already has an aegis save) become even more resistant to cannonballs?

  • Universally Baffled - DH Lists

    Cam - - Dwarven Holds (DH)

    Post

    Double throne king is interesting.....

  • Universally Baffled - DH Lists

    Cam - - Dwarven Holds (DH)

    Post

    UK UB event lists: Adam Jones @Tanka 205 - Dragon Seeker 145 - Engineer, General, Forge Repeater 240 - 10 Clan Marksmen, Shield, Guild-Crafted Handgun 240 - 10 Clan Marksmen, Shield, Guild-Crafted Handgun 235 - 10 Greybeards, Shield, Musician, Champion 210 - 10 Clan Marksmen, Shield, Crossbow 210 - 10 Clan Warriors, Shield, Throwing Weapons, Vanguard, Musician 655 - 6 Hold Guardians, Standard Bearer (Runic Standard of the Hold), Musician 335 - Grudge Buster 335 - Grudge Buster 254 - 9 Seekers, B…

  • Nah my bad, I mis-read what you wrote. I'm in day 2 of a hangover, be gentle.

  • RR1 and +1 to miscasts for Thaum would mean more likely to get them to blow up a wizard.

  • Quote from Peacemaker: “Idea for a magic item: Basically it's the revers of the HBE one: Once per magic phase, you can make your opponent re-roll 1 dispel dice. ” Playing against Thaumaturgy would be a laugh.

  • Grumbling on new ID book

    Cam - - Dwarven Holds (DH)

    Post

    Also we have to give feedback Wednesday 3rd June. While I will look through here it would make my life easier if you posted in: Here

  • Grumbling on new ID book

    Cam - - Dwarven Holds (DH)

    Post

    Quote from dan: “Quote from Pellegrim: “Quote from Squigkikka: “I don't think more special rules and exceptions is the answer ” 9th Age seems to disagree with you.See the latest two new books: DL and ID. ” Just want to point out that two data points don’t make a pattern, and that the DL book should be treated as an outlier regardless because the army’s overall design and lack of regular special items makes it inherently more complicated. ” While we were told that the ID book flies in the face of…

  • Celtic Cup Lists

    Cam - - Dwarven Holds (DH)

    Post

    Quote from Danrakh: “Quote from Sander: “You reform in a conga, steel movement this way and then 12” forward? Isnt that disallowed by some role? I mean, imagine what 25 vanguarding seekers can do.. ” 12" vanguard + 9" march = 21"So nothing forbidden here. Edit: Well, maybe except for the 1127 in core and 4493/4500. This is just unacceptable. ” You should start a pimp my list thread and get peoples core to 1125 and total to 4500

  • Quote from Radian: “Quote from Cam: “There’s armies with a strength in armour that only get HA in core. So not sure that’s fair. ” bad design on their side shouldn't bother our book. They'll have a rework and than they'll get fitting treatement. Or not. ” Its not bad design, it's intended design that heavy armour = strength in armour, LA = normal, none = poor with plate being the best (and until ID limited). If HA is to be introduced I'd imagine it would be on TG or something.

  • There’s armies with a strength in armour that only get HA in core. So not sure that’s fair.

  • Footsluggers set up

    Cam - - General Discussion

    Post

    Yeah 0-x shooting units can keep scoring, dropping the standard is probably enough to visualise. Free commands is good too.

  • Celtic Cup Lists

    Cam - - Dwarven Holds (DH)

    Post

    My seekers are under quarantine for this one. Yeah fast melee is going to be an issue but it’s stuff I want to play with again I’ve not used in a long time (or for Balistas just try) so looking forward to playing it. UD and BH are in the group and will probably blow through me.

  • Footsluggers set up

    Cam - - General Discussion

    Post

    I wouldn’t impose a shooting cap as these are already limited in the books. Maybe the fact they’ll need to be 8 wide will be enough as they will take a fair bit of deployment room. Light troops I don’t think I’d include as footsloggers as they aren’t really battle line units. Cool concept though.