Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 599.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • #48 / Retreat

    Casp - - Secondary Objectives Proposals

    Post

    I dont know i think it should be tested to see really how it impact game. Center would be weird. But all side could be good . A specific hole to escape, could be good too, but seems a bit complex. I think about something really more simple. You play the game, but more you come close to the 6 turn, the more you think to escape your unit, and colme close of the board edge ^^..

  • Quote from DanT: “Interesting. So it seems whilst there is some support for the "tree anvil and elf shooting" amongst the early responses, there is also a strong contingent of something like "run around quickly, make the enemy try to run in every direction and then pounce on isolated parts". One further flavour question: What should be the circumstances under which SE lose? (From a flavour/big picture perspective still; e.g. for EoS my answer would be something like "when the battleline gets dis…

  • Quote from Peacemaker: “I just saw this post. ...recent insights into the Dread Elf design process show that Dread Elves use "shadow mists" for close ranges shenanigans. No details yet on those shenanigans. --------------------------------------- Well no reason for SE to not have same kind of magic, after all it’s same people. Just related the more to natural element for SE because it’s how they see the world. I don't want to see gimmicky army widerules tacked onto the elf books just to deal wit…

  • @DanT magical forest and fog appearS on the battle field. And then just wait during archer shoot to the enemy. When enemy enter into forest they are slaughter by elves and strange wood spirit. Or enter into fog and loose direction. sometime a deadly cavalry should go out of the fog to strike an unit then des appear again once the fight is a success. a fight against SE should be something really disturbing and confunsing. As long battle go in the right direction for SE, you should have the sensat…

  • Quote from Shino: “but model only has one set of defenwsive stats, so there is no "bearer toughness" RAW if a wizard is in combat with daemon they will swap their stats, so wizard will be r6, while daemon will get only r5 out of curiosity. since focused spells also apply to mdel part, does sniper spell doing 3 wounds to wizard on said mount remove whole model, as wixzard is reduced to 0 hp (he has 3 in his own profile, while 5 is from combined profile with mount)? ” Humm..You make me doubt. Neve…

  • Quote from Shino: “mount is not a special item, so check rather 19.B.3 than 22.B.b ” Locket of Sunna is a special item. The rules clearly write, that it apply to the bearer and not to his mount. The locket specify, it apply to the bearer. It also specify, that you swap with a model part with neither Harnessed nor Inanimate. Mount arent take in consideration when using a locket. Rules 22.B.b: • The wielder, wearer, or bearer: these terms mean the same thing for rules purposes and refer to the mod…

  • Quote from AEnoriel: “The difficulty comes from the part "Line of Sight cannot be drawn to targets outside the unit’s Front Arc..." which doesn't consider the Damsel as a "single fig" unit inside another big unit. ” I agree.. RAW it look like the damsel would not be allowed to cast a spell outside of the unit frotn arc, wich is weird. Quote from Shino: “bearer stat is 5 when mounted on the mount ” No See rules 22.B.b

  • Quote from Shino: “I don't believe bearer has separate defensive statistics to the model anymore, so there should be only one R statistic to swap ” Its not the question. locket swap Bearer stat. Does not apply to mount.

  • Do a Koe damsel using stand behing can cast Missile spell ? Do the first rank block Line of sight ? Seems logic, but its look like i just realize that KOE magic phase will be even more crap than actually ^^.. I though add a lighting vambrace.. But then i will need to forget this idea.

  • Terrain is most important for me.. Even if sadly since i play T9A the rules aspect make our table really less fun and more flat standardized. Where what i really would love is to play on table that look like a real battlefield, withgrass, bridge, hill of the size of the table.. etc...

  • Quote from Borcha: “No resurrection see page 60 (if its can not fit a legal position, that didn't work) ” But according space rule,s its a legal position. As you dont have to respect 1 space rules, once you already into the within the 1"

  • Could an unit engaged into a combat raise some model that bring the last rank within 0.5 feet of à friends unit. for me yes as i read the rules. Once the unit is engaged it does not have to respect 1 feet space rules until it leave out of 1 feet. And apply again the 1 feet space rules.

  • Quote from DanT: “It isn't long (zero design updates) since "make parent and support better and more important and extend it to more units" was a common refrain here. Now we have "remove light infantry from parent and support". ” Well i tell this since the day 1 of the update that give us shoot and 3 rank and accurate order. I tell you immediatly, there was an issue with parent synergie.,and that accurate order is powerful but will create a light unbalance between crossbow and handgun for compet…

  • Light infantry doesnt need to move. Would be too strong. Its parent unit who need to move. We should rethink the relation between parent and light, and issue will be solved. About Handgun and crossbow, there isent really any issue. Give long rifle to handgun champion only, maybe make it sniper, special rules to not be a real chmpaion, and dont need to pay for a stupid champion tax. And maybe improve how order work, to not incitate to play small unit. To be able to take 2 long rifle. Actually get…

  • I can have a look in the gallery, but to help me you can propose to me directly a selection of your favourite , and i will pick up 1 or 2. I talk about more zoomed, just look at the last one. But i see in post before than there is already some like this.

  • Background is quite nice. Did you make other photo more zoomed? Pleas go into photo topic into general discussion forum. I have to look into your gallery

  • Quote from Ungrik: “T9A is doing a nice job with the scroll, but I rarely register something on their FB page (there was this question for some bloggers to review the ID book, creating a buzz, but that was the first time in forever that I saw something from them). As for the scroll, the fact that I need to click click click and download to start reading it, well that is just to much effort in this time and age. ” Use T9A website ^^.. all files accessible with only one click. I fight hard for thi…

  • Quote from JimMorr: “my idea became direct opposition to Project. ” Just in few word ? Wich kind of idea ?

  • Well all EoS heavy and light infantry are great. I need them to win, and with synergie they perform as well than our special choice

  • Unit filler is your friend Personnaly I don’t feel like 200 model is a lot. I often play with 150 fir eos so we’ll get more with rats seems alright. now it should not be the only playstyle of course. Just viable for people who like it .