Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 737.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is available! You can read all about it in the news.

  • 1. No, first line of the Lance rules. The bonus only applies to attacks allocated against enemies in the models front facing. 2. The +1 is for charging that turn, it doesn't matter if they wiped the enemy out or not.

  • Quote from Hebus: “Quote from vince3310: “Quote from Eisenheinrich: “Could you please draw a situation where this would happen? ” Something like that. My fanatics start to the right of my cave goblins unit. Then it goes to the right within 1'' of my iron orcs.The distance is not enough to end its mouvement at 1'' from Iron orcs. But the backtrack didn't bring my fanatic to a valid position... ” Didn't see an answer to this question. ” It's going to get errata'd as it's a situation not covered by…

  • Quote from Pica25: “So a SE prince on dragon or HBE Commander on Griffon does not have the -1 ld nor have to take a fear tests, but still needs to pass panic tests, correct ? ” Correct! Quote from Pica25: “That part is a bit confusing I must say ” I think you're getting tripped up by the similar names and how they both provide an immunity to fear. They're different rules, having one wont grant the other.

  • Quote from Pica25: “When a mount has fear or is gigantic, does the rider also has fear (no panic tests) ? For instance a SE prince on dragon or HBE Commander on Griffon ” It's a universal rule so the entire model is affected.

  • Quote from Chronocide: “Pretty sure I can't, but having trouble finding where it says this. Can I buy a weapon enchantment for a weapon my mount has? ” You're not prevented from doing that as far as I can see. We only seem to state the model can purchase special items, not model part.

  • So, we remove the randomness and add a more tactical aspect? Other than the problem of it being a lot of work to rebalance everything for potentially not a massive change in overall balance, it would certainly make the game more interesting. I like it. Now just wait 10+ years for 3.0 to get made and we'll maybe implement it

  • Quote from BorkBork: “1. What happens when two O&G wrecking teams hit each other? (we played it that the moving one got 3D6 like any other unit would when moving into contact with a wrecking team, and the other one got 2D6 hit like any other unit would when hit by a wrecking team). ” Correct! Quote from BorkBork: “2. Wanted to ask how fast random movers would persue after combat but i found it clearly written in the rules by now. They persue at their random movement rate (so 3D6 in this part…

  • Parry Rule

    theunwantedbeing - - Rules Questions & Answers


    Link to the latest Slim Rules Parry is on Page 106 Page 107 under Hand Weapon is where it states how to get it with that weapon And for anyone who can't be bothered to do that, here's the text for the Parry Rule and Hand Weapon rule in full. 21.D.b.7 Parry Parry can only be used against Close Combat Attacks from the Front Facing. The model gains one of the followingeffects, whichever would result in a higher Defensive Skill: • The model gains +1 Defensive Skill. • The model’s Defensive Skill is …

  • Quote from WhammeWhamme: “berti is correct that the way the poll was set up made reaching a 60% "change it!" threshold was incredibly unlikely. Even if 60% of the voters would prefer square bases. Why? Because the only vote that counted as "for square bases" was "I want square bases and I don't trust the RT to make the right decision". Had square bases gotten 60%+ on that poll, the RT should probably have resigned, because it would have been a sign they had lost the trust of the community at lar…

  • Quote from Kreln: “EoS Reiters with Reapeating Gun, after moving -1 or -2 to aim? ” -2 as they're Unwieldy.

  • Quote from Danimoth: “"against the unit with Cover Volley in their current position" that is the sentence, it does not say to prevent you got charged it underlines the position, if it meant what you are saying than Cover Volley would not be able to be used to cover a fleeing unit that got charged as well, since if you pretend you are the target you have to flee. No where it says you pretend you are the target, but to stand and shoot as if you were charged in your position. Is my flee correlation…

  • Quote from Danimoth: “Since Magical Heirloom does nothing regarding spell selection but makes the wearer have the Hereditary spell, having it disabled would stop the caster's access to the hereditary spell, as long as Ring has the Heirloom as its target? ” Correct You ignore the effects of the Magical Heirloom when it is affected by the Ring of the Pearl Throne. Those effects being "always knows the Hereditary Spell" and "Can't lose the Hereditary Spell".

  • Yes. I think there's been an error in thinking as there's presumably an assumption that each +1 would get applied individually before the next one is applied but not immediately after the last one was applied. Meaning the immediate explosion at 18 HP happens before you add the +1 to get to 19. That isn't what happens though, they'll all get applied together and you'll skip over the numbers between. eg. +2HP at 17 HP would put you on 19 HP and you wouldn't explode.

  • Quote from 2Cats1Tuna: “Can a Hope Harvester Stomp Attack? I'm struggling to find any rules saying that it can't. Thanks. ” It gets Stomp(1) due to being Large. It gets Stomp(D6) due to being Gigantic if you purchase the Engine of Damnation upgrade. That's it, it being a war platform (when large) doesn't change this.

  • Quote from Danrakh: “Thanks for the answer @theunwantedbeing Perhaps I didn't phrase myself clearly enough. Are those discrepancies intended? ” Yes.

  • 1. It's not a combat reform. 2. That's how the game works.

  • Like the great primates of the jungles of Taphria, orcs are strong and robust beings. In battle they seem able to resist the most terrible wounds and still continue fighting. Distinctive features include large fangs and the earthy hues of their hide - from ochre to green to darkest brown - all combining to give them a terrifying and wild aspect. Probably best to skip page 1 of that lore lest we all jump to the wrong conclusion about how we're supposed to be viewing what an orc looks like.

  • Quote from Damo: “How do drive a chariot through a forest? you can't, its ridiculous. ” If there's a path through the forest wide enough, why wouldn't it be able to? Quote from Damo: “Now before you say I'm applying old fluff to t9a, thats BH aren't just about forests, your right. But a chariot needs a wheel to move, and a wheel needs a flat surface. I'm going to go even further and say a wheel needs an artificial surface- preferably a road, but at worst, a cultivated field. You every walked acr…

  • So are people wanting spears to mean cavalry can't charge them, or just that cavalry don't get any charging bonuses for charging them (in the front)?

  • Quote from KhaN9292: “But anyways If paired weapons didnt break Parry wouldnt Parry be borderline OP? ” Most models with parry aren't especially powerful, so it's unlikely. Quote from KhaN9292: “Or rework Parry, which probably wont happen in a long time ” Definitely won't happen for ages. But there's absolutely no harm coming up with alternate ideas as to how Parry (or paired weapon) could be reworked and having a discussion about it.