Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 1,000. There are more results available, please enhance your search parameters.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is available! You can read all about it in the news.

  • 2 Things: Please use numbers when you mark the magic paths. 1 for one damsel of that kind using it. (That allows it to count how many wizards use a given path even if in a list more than one wizard takes the same path). And here 1 unit of 52 Knights Aspirants let's me belive it should be 1 of 5. The rest looks good.

  • Including the 2 I smuggled on tonight?

  • @optimus: Let us Try it with D6) than.

  • Thx. The info in here is enough. Sorry for sending you to a tourney without armies for you.

  • ID General Chat

    Just_Flo - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Having feedback on it would generally be good I belive.

  • ID General Chat

    Just_Flo - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Yesterday, I mostly felt that it was a bad idea to write the armylist, the first BH one for me since some editions from a different game some minutes before the deadline and to try out to much Gimnick stuff. My feedback would be, that I the biggest problem was that I absolutely wanted to play a far to big Pig unit and no Harpies for serious redirecting. Adding me manageing to mistake out of 6" for out of 12" and many bad play moves on my part I belive the map was the smallest of my problems. Reg…

  • ID General Chat

    Just_Flo - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from Tyranno: “Quote from Herminard: “Do you know where the Map Pack discussion thread is? I have not been able to find it again. ” I hear you need a...map to find it. ” Should be somewhere in General Discussion.

  • The easiest way to do this is to use the applicationsystem or a PM.

  • Quote from Bulls Eye: “well to be hounest, i think the lack of feedback also has something to do with the lack of a active ACS (not to judge anybody, life can be more important than some plastic soldiers). back in the time when ID LAB came out. I tried to start something up Are we becomming a endangered species? But not much imput or reaction from ACS. So it felt like screaming in the dessert. The effect of this, is less people will participate in the forum. ” I belive most of the time I was Ass…

  • ID General Chat

    Just_Flo - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from Just_Flo: “Quote from Just_Flo: “Quote from Arrahed: “My personal experience with providing ID feedback in army specific threads is that it gets ignored. ” Quote from Masamune88: “@Tyranno because no one official frequents them to ask for engagement or pose specific questions. They have been set up but they are not managed, it's very much like turning a car on but not putting it in gear. I still dont understand why the team didnt use their ACS teams to gather specific responses to que…

  • What SE currently lacks

    Just_Flo - - Sylvan Elves (SE)

    Post

    It might be shocking but pherhaps they are paired as scorrers and not as blockers?

  • The earlier the list data is entered correctly the earlier it can happen.

  • ID General Chat

    Just_Flo - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    It still seems strange, that people don't use the Feedback threads in their army board. As for example SE and DH do have naturally different problems with ID (or all other books) not mixing the feedback from all 16 armies together in one thread would seem logical.

  • Hi lionamara, are you interested to work in TA?

  • 2.0 BH Beta Discussion Thread

    Just_Flo - - Beast Herds (BH)

    Post

    Some problems cant be adressed by points. Till LAB only points are possible. Popularity and army performance often dont match. A popular army isnt necessary a strong army and an unpopular army isnt necessary a weak army. Points changes are done in regard to Powerlevel and use of units not in regard of popularity. So a good solution could be to push for a soon LAB. Only LAB can lead to redesigns.

  • We can only work in the communicated Framework. Travelling back in time and makeing community not ask for a rules freeze seems to be the only solution.

  • Again no connection to pricing mechanismen, ID or DE or anything I wrote. That you are unhappy and others, too is noted and was noted long ago. It is like I ask what do you think of Apples and of beans and you answer the cherries are sour. But of course one can always bring things from before last pricing round to reason before the next pricing round. So far your argument looks like in the French Tourney I visit I and my friends are unhappy with BH. Well we dont price slone for the subset of the…

  • ID General Chat

    Just_Flo - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from rbf911: “Quote from Masamune88: “Quote from rbf911: “Quote from Masamune88: “In the interests of being constructive, i'll answer from an outsiders perspective The problem from my POV... ” Wow...is there anything else you would like to nerf from an outsiders perspective? The data from tournaments doesn’t seem to show that ID are too overpowered currently. Some points values will change and some units are currently being modified. I believe the team is also looking at some of the sugges…

  • What did I mean with partly still care? Well it means that despite no feedback from BH on ID and DE spoilers I and others as far as possible try to represent BH interests or what we belive them to be in regard of ID and DE developement. That when somebody comes with a total wrong assumption on the current balancing methodes that we correct those assumptions. Only who knows how something works can work good with it. Representing someone who does not want to be represented or who makes it as diffi…