Search Results

Quote from duxbuse: “Quote from KeyserSoze: “Μaybe I play with against bad opponents but but evocation and 2 lords in such a unit has worked very well for me. Plus that VC has a lot of chuff to allow this unit get into preferable combats. ” it should work well, 2 vampire counts plus a unit of barrow guard is easily over 1500 points, probably more like over 2000. It'd be close to 50% of the army ” It's true but I can switch 2nd(or both) lords(s) to another unit or even get them alone, if there's …

Μaybe I play with against bad opponents but but evocation and 2 lords in such a unit has worked very well for me. Plus that VC has a lot of chuff to allow this unit get into preferable combats.

Y thanks a lot!

Quote from Chronocide: “Quote from KeyserSoze: “Just remembered I have a small BH army and with the new giants coming in I slowly develop some love for the pack Thing is I have 0 chariots, and old ones are hard to find. I use other chariots as proxies but it breaks the theme. Any suggestions for good looking, not OOP models? Thanks. ” T9A is model agnostic and every Construct has the Chariot rule. So really any Construct looking model could work, just needs the draft animals and riders represent…

Just remembered I have a small BH army and with the new giants coming in I slowly develop some love for the pack Thing is I have 0 chariots, and old ones are hard to find. I use other chariots as proxies but it breaks the theme. Any suggestions for good looking, not OOP models? Thanks.

Just remember that the team needs a REALLY good reason to add extra units. They allowed to add units to quite a few armybooks, but it was under a very long consideration.

It's a giant prank.

Nice for gortach.829c2834.jpg

How's that for flaggelants?91526091_10212862509316295_7546030266582564864_n.jpg

βH have a special relationship with ambushing in general

Νew hellmaw is on the way :P90775765_2268256826814240_5699750802445303808_o.jpg

Did you check this? Really impressive and 100% ID! If the kit allows it I would use the upper part as a lamassu, if not on the same list with bound daemon. 90775765_2268256826814240_5699750802445303808_o.jpg

Quote from Klexe: “Quote from KeyserSoze: “Prolbem is tha some koe armies are a little difficult to distinguise units. Ok, all my opponents so far are doing their best to keep them as different as possible, so an addition of huskars would be quite welcome. ” ah say that to DL players or even dwarfs...^^ ” Well DL is an unfair comparison due to the book having gone through a complete redesign. Again, don't take me wrong, it's not players' fault but a limited model range issue.

Prolbem is tha some koe armies are a little difficult to distinguise units. Ok, all my opponents so far are doing their best to keep them as different as possible, so an addition of huskars would be quite welcome.

Well if you judge by the models they revealed and some of the old they are purely historical like most koe models.

Apparently, Kislev models are coming back. Anyone considering them for koe?

warhammer-community.com/2020/0…hkhcbiuPnxZWKpH-mMGee6RxU So, this came up today. I never had the chance to get models from this faction, but now, if a good range comes up, I might as well work in the homebrew, or in an aux book

Quote from arwaker: “Now with Europe wide home office, the design teams should have more time for 9th age work? At least the trip to office now is gone. ” Well it's not that simple, with all this madness I doubt most people have the creativity to work on that.

Besides the 9th age I've been playing a lot of RPGs and board games. I understand that some players might take too seriously a game that is about warfare and beating your opponent. But even in more casual non-war games people tend to be competitive too. I remember playing the Overlord in Descent, and one of the players was consistently trying to cheat. And I've seen players getting mad or cheating even in cooperative games...

I think there too many already, but an aux armybook "skinks only" would be nice, including only skinks and dinos.