Search Results

Got 12-8 agains SE in that game. Forgot stuff like: wild huntsman are not scoring Hope Harvester. Summoned it next to Wild Huntsmen. 2 veils used, rolled to shots... 5+5! 26 shots... after smoke settles one Wild Huntsman is dead. That unit performed much better in melee My favorite elf killer is Legion Tresher 4d3 S4 ap3 impacts are just right for elves. 10" threat is so big it can join the fight where ever or zone half of the board.

That is good reason to have one unit of infiltrators with you. Taking one Archetype allows 10" or 9" march for units. to range is 20-22" for summon "poke" on top of infiltration. Also this should not be safe, as per design :). Cultists are not the most stabile people...

I think we had item like that in earlier revisions, but it did not see any use. The character budgets seemed to be used on something else, so based on that data we removed it. Also it did have quite small impact on army so we tried to find something more impactfull. Not sure if we succeeded though edit: Cultists are in New Recruit! Yay! And I joined tournament 12th Clashing Roundabouts 9 in UB. (Hidden Content) I managed to post list with error, and did not do reviews so... I'm starting tourney …

As Cultists are crazy giving 8pts head start is only fair :). I think all lists are checked? So what has left for me was to paste the findings to New Recruit thread. Thanks for that goes to @Martins9thAge for spotting that. Good luck and have fun everyone.

Few things in Cultists. Great to see them in New Recruit! :). Quote: “Infiltrators (0–15 Models / Unit,0–3 Units/Army) ” going over 15 does not give alarm/ get blocked Quote: “Throwing Weapons (5+) (Infiltrators only) 20 ” it should be 20pts for unit, now it is 20pts for model :).

Whoopsie. Swapped infiltrator in at last moment. Will put those extras in two other units that do about same as those guys. fixed. 20-> 15 and another with no equ 20->25

Good to see you get to play in UB tourney! Hope I'm not late... My favorites have been Hoarders and Legion Tresher. I think you can fit some of that. If you expect dragons and similar, Titanslayer might be good zoner. But I think Legion tresher with Roaming hands and Evocation is as good for that.

” Warhammer? No this is lance. But it was so fragile it snapped and I tried to clue it and it just ended as that big blob and the glue still would not hold...” What part is iconic? Actual rules? Names? Feel? Unit distribution? Backgroud? Everyone has different expectations I think, and that makes designing so hard. I really hope it all comes together but if it is not something you expected it still is in someone elses expected list

Well those are the new units. We ofc have the vassal stuff from ID but indeed using just O&G is not that straithforward. We put a lot of emphasis not to take anything away from future of Goblins. So that is why we have a lot of "new" stuff even if it is almost clone to some other armies units. And ofc remember this is almost first draft and we all know first draft is bad :).

Good comments! More the better Something I think I did not noticed on quick read. Is there anything missing? What are you assuming we keep in book even if it is not mentioned. This might be a "Fey contract" for all you know...

The game start setting is bit unrealistic, it is good for game but lacks some depth if for example you are playing campaingn. This semi-short pre-game addition changes deployment, choosing sides, starting the game and maybe some terrains on the battelefield. My driving goal was to avoid any extra memory burden after the game starts. So everything that happened in the pre-game should be irrelevant after the player going first is decided. Currently there is one thing that has to be marked. This se…

No need locking I think. Losing temper happens to all of us. More often if I have a bad day. And I might I be so bold to say our hobby had a bad year... Back to the issues then?

I was watching Gilmore Girls with my wife. And thought I’ll check if we have progressed into discussion about learning to be better player by experimenting different playstyles, and what should they be... ... and what do I find here... Lesson of today: more Gilmore, less forums Though I’m still game in talking about playstyle experimenting. Ceterum censeo no unit restriction changes on (gold) books please

(The usual DanT has omitted lately) I also encourage everyone to play more (all) armies. At least if you want to win more :). Has helped me. WDG has indeed many different builds for different situations The two I swap around are. the high risk 4 heroes on karkadans( or now some other similar). And random movers I can get + 2 wizards for simple play. Just roll dice list :). Infantry might be next then...

These are ofc personal opinions as I was not in working with patch apart from supplement points costing. For me 0-x is not points change. This is based on sloppy memory, but during time of designing LABs I was not told that the limits might change. Most of all DL chariots got bad hit. But I should whine in correct threads

0-3 Karkadans, because... Spent a good deal of time huting for Four horsemen of Apocalypse models. Then converting, painting, and having my snowflake list. And while it indeed won a big tournament I got only sad people in local chat to see that the list got nullified. I thought that if book is Gold, it stands that I can spend a good deal on models and they do not get invalidated. Just points which I can shift around

Armies also share units and it changes come along the parent army which is very monitored. Thenk some aligning to own units towards those units. And orc everyone is playing Eyratöki

(Hidden Content) SA 9 - Mak 11

Tell TO that line is a storytext about beserkers mental state.

Even if that would be done, time would not be yet. DE is in beta, this is gold. So swapping units to experimentals would result us making all kinds of updates all the time. Gets easily unsychronized and extra effort. Also Gold has a promise of stability. Jumping the gun is not good here.