Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 820.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • Quote from Perch: “Gorgeous model indeed. GW, u have my attention again (models-wise ). ” Probably the only model lizardmen will get for the next couple years, as usual. Thank god there are better alternatives.

  • Quote from clorens: “what was your list ? ” In any specific match up? Since all those games were over a longer period of time and I'm pretty new to the army it was more or less different between each game, the only constant being things like Soothsayer, Chariot unit, Hounds, Gargoyles and 1 Mino unit (varying in size and equipment though). Other than that: Minolord, Beasts characters on foot, Wildhorn or Longhorn block, ambush spam, Centaur darts or bus w/ Cent hero, Razors in unit or singles, C…

  • Quote from Shinymetallass: “where can we see all rosters? ” discord.com/invite/bWvMwudv9w If invite isn't working get through manually on worldteamchampionships.com Get on their discord and look there: T9A-SINGLES-EVENT -> #lists and T9A-TEAM-EVENT -> #lists

  • ID General Chat

    Dancaarkiiel - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from darkknight109: “I mean, DH can bring along four ballistae, two flame cannons and two catapults and still (barely) fit within their limits for a 4500 point game, so clearly that concentration of heavy weapons (with ranges longer than ours and comparable S/AP profiles) isn't going to destroy the game's balance. [...] ” I don't think they actually can unless I'm missing something obvious. Engines of War - 20% = 900pts Ballista 100pts, 4x=400pts Flame Cannon 145pts, 2x=290pts Catapult 205…

  • Some stats since there's so few lists. I'll double check it later on and maybe add something more, like characters. Cuatl Paths: 3x Alchemy+Pyro, 2x Divination, 2x Protean, 1x Evocation Cuatl Disciplines: 4x Grasp, 3x Trained, 2x Reality, 2x Symbiosis, 2x Protean, 1x Weaver, 1x Breaker Priest Paths: 5x Druidism, 2x Shamanism Core: 5x Warriors (6x total, 2x Piranha, 1x Serpent, 1x Crocodile, 4x Spear), 7x Skinks (16x total, 11x javelins, 4x bows, 2x Caimans) Special: 4x Caimans (5x total), 2x Rap…

  • WTC/GTC ONLINE 2021 TEAMS (Hidden Content) SINGLES (Hidden Content)

  • Some games from the past ~2/3 months or so. Tournament: Opponent: DE, old (Dragon Beastmaster, Temple BSB with Div, Warlock, 2/3x Spears, Crossbows, 2x Kraken, 3x Bolts, 2x Riders, probably something else) Scenario: Secure the Target (lost) Score: 3:17 MVP: Minos+Minolord (got a charge off, destroyed some things but Minos got killed off in the process and cost me the scenario) LVP: Longhorns w/ BSB and Gen (literally first panic check=destroyed) Opponent: HE (Spear Lord, Pyro Mage, Moct BSB, 30 …

  • Quote from sonny1086: “Ofc the build was there before, but nowadays this combo seems to become the dominant one. Do we have more tournament data yet? With Adept support its a huge invesment, but very strong. ” Nothing concrete yet, there are WTC lists coming soon though.

  • Quote from sonny1086: “Indeed another very inspireing list! Seems @marcema created the new frog build ” You mean Grasp+Protean?

  • Quote from TJKL: “[...] Did you play this correctly or am I missing something??? ” In general special attacks (stomps, breaths, impacts etc) don't benefit from attack attributes (flamings, lethals, divines etc) unless specifically noted. So in this case Stygio's breath weapon will benefit from +1 to-wound modifier since it's not an attack attribute but just a magical effect, and won't get flaming attacks for the reason mentioned earlier. It's under 21.H in Rulebook. It's a neat trick to help out…

  • Quote from ukrocky: “One of the most annoying things on this rule is the way it stacks with the bound wheel turns item, or indeed any bound item, so the effective bound on the army book item is 6/10 Which also means the above wording from @Dancaarkiiel wouldn't work as it'd push it to a 7/11 ” Easily fixed with "Learned Spells" which doesn't include bounds

  • Quote from Baldin: “In this img. The harpies charge the flank of the skeletons. Is the charge a fail due to the obs guard, or can they align while flying? imgur.com/a/T28NCDn ” Fly applies to the entirety of "the move" (charge in this case), and this one ends after touching and aligning both units. So yes, it's a possible charge because you'll align/close the door while still flying.

  • Pretty great, definitely futuristic which is a nice change. Skinks seem to have their heads a little bit too big, eh?

  • Quote from durion: “If the first obstacle would be the Unit Boundary of an enemy unit that did not Flee from the same combat, the Pursuing unit declares a Charge against that unit, using its Pursuit Distance roll as its Charge Range..... .....The Pursuing unit im- mediately performs a Charge Move (following all the normal Move Chargers rules) towards the previously determined Facing. This says that the enemy unit must be the first obstacle the unit hits. The unit cannot perform a wheel in order …

  • Quote from xaby86: “Hi, I'm watching some friends' game and a question has come up. A unit (a totemic beast in this case) has annihilated an enemy unit (imps) and ran away, lucky enough to touch another enemy unit. The thing is that from its initial position it could see the enemy rearguard but in a straight line, it touched a flank. A friend of mine says that as he comes into contact, he can make a pivot like a normal charge to get into the rear. The other says it makes it an impossible charge.…

  • SA LAB

    Dancaarkiiel - - Saurian Ancients (SA)

    Post

    Quote from Traumdieb: “@Peacemaker which updates of cuatl are in your view competitive? Think there are more than two competitive. Grasp, Symbiosis, Trained by birth, Protean, Master of Reality (this one is maybe not competitive to Grasp but is manageable via points) are all played. ” Breaker sees some play as well, I'd say they're internally balanced more or less. Basically the only ones being "dead" are path related ones - Trashfire and Knowledge. Really makes you think... :^)

  • SA LAB

    Dancaarkiiel - - Saurian Ancients (SA)

    Post

    Quote from Shinymetallass: “[...] But please don't create play style "coatl burning out his enemy by powerful magic" ” I would love that playstyle as I do now, not on 8th ed level obviously. Since Cuatl has a number of complex issues, both external and internal, some of them rooted back in GW's design and affecting the entire army in a rather negative way, I'm confident he'll see a major redesign. Anyway, before guidelines are known it's all pure guesswork, but if I were to assume our playstyles…

  • SA LAB

    Dancaarkiiel - - Saurian Ancients (SA)

    Post

    Quote from skipschnit: “So basically Saurian tyrannids. ” Now we're talkin'! (Hidden Content)

  • SA LAB

    Dancaarkiiel - - Saurian Ancients (SA)

    Post

    Dunno, we're supposed to be THE Monster army yet we have only 2 gigantic units, one of which is a character mount with a minimal cost of ~800pts. Other than that 3 large cavalry units, not really "big" so actually yeah, we could use another dedicated monster with a different design and purpose, after all why not ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • SA LAB

    Dancaarkiiel - - Saurian Ancients (SA)

    Post

    Quote from arwaker: “Quote from berti: “it is not the vermin book, so I would not expect laser dinos.... ” big bronce mirror and glass lens, assembled on Dino back, making deadly focused beams of sunlight.... Does not sound totally off to me. ” It's pretty easy to justify (Hidden Content)