Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 96.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • IMMORTALS Beta 4

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from WhammeWhamme: “We have not even started, no. At this point, we're waiting for people to play more games and give feedback. At some point in the future the RT will determine the scope of beta 5, and then we will begin. You'll be using Beta 4 for months yet. ” And for the points ?! It's the same thing ?

  • IMMORTALS Beta 4

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Do we know when we will get this new update? The team work on it at the moment?

  • ID General Chat

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    I personally play 12 Enforcers with BB GW and just Flaming standard. That's a good unit. Fast. Resilient. And hit hard on shoot and in melee. Just put them in front of a 4 inches unit and shoot 2 times. And if he fails the charge, well shoot another 2 times. So 48 shoots, 16 hits. It's a very good unit to flank too. Because your opponent can't just ignore them because they are just a melee unit. And they have a 26inches threat zone too

  • IMMORTALS Beta 4

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    @darkknight109 The fact is today Anointed have two job. Anvil with commissioner and bodyguard. Hammer because they have a great impact in melee. When they are used as hammer you can split commissioner (cowboy) and Anointed (melee units) If we delete Bodyguard. This is not the same game because we delete their anvil job.

  • ID General Chat

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from Kriegschmidt: “Sweet. Where will the Ashuruk Prophet go? With the Immortals? ” In Citadel Guards

  • IMMORTALS Beta 4

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from Villon: “But, if Annointed are too good, they will receive a point increase in next iterations. The problem is rules imo. Are Annointed ok in rules? (you said that they need to lose Bodyguard) Are Immortals ok? Are Core ok? And this thread is more focused on Immortals BUT if you think that the problem with immortals is, that Annointed are too good or too cheap, that ins an interesting point of view too ” My POV is that if we adjust the points and if Anointed loose Bodyguard, we will s…

  • ID General Chat

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Time for lists ? Well that's mine : Infernal Dwarves 540 - Prophet, Prophet of Nezibkesh, Infernal Bastion, Wizard Adept, Occultism, Flintlock Axe (Eye of the Bull) 490 - Prophet, General, Prophet of Ashuruk, Wizard Master, Pyromancy, Talisman of the Void 330 - Vizier, Shield (Kadim Binding), Battle Standard Bearer, Mask of Ages, Great Weapon, Talisman of Shielding 530 - 25 Infernal Warriors, Shield, Blunderbuss, Standard Bearer (Flaming Standard), Musician, Champion 419 - 17 Citadel Guard, Flin…

  • IMMORTALS Beta 4

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Why do you want to nerf Dwarf Core units ? That's make no sense. Today the special section is over dominated by Anointed, if you nerf the core units, well Anointed still dominated. I make a list with some Immortals, I had give it to a very good player and he just said that Anointed are more competitive than Immortals. Nerf IW and CG and we will see Vassal units for core only (for melee not for shooting) If you want to see more Immortals, they need a discount and Anointed needs a nerf (like no Bo…

  • IMMORTALS Beta 4

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Want to give a real anvil role to Immortal ? 1- Delete Bodyguard for Annointed 2- 5+ aegis but no Battle Focus

  • ID General Chat

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from Ciara: “Plz dont. Battle focus is one of the most broken rules out here. ” Battle focus is just another rule with the same stat than Lightning reflexes. So do you think all armies with some lightning are broken?

  • ID General Chat

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Another thing on gunnery team. Some of you say that it's strong in a melee unit but if you missfire and can't shoot anymore. It's just a sad day to the unit because you can't throw away the gunnery team.

  • ID General Chat

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    So you want to give gunnery team standard height and infantry. Because for the moment, it's a construct. So no defense from his unit. If it's a 180 pts Mortar with S3 18inches, just give me a damn orc catapult

  • ID General Chat

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    How many points for a 18 inches Mortar S3 foi1 stand behind?! 100-120?!

  • ID General Chat

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from WhammeWhamme: “270 Rocket Battery 270 Rocket Battery 95 Hobgoblin Bolt Thrower 95 Hobgoblin Bolt Thrower 135 Grenade Launcher 135 Grenade Launcher ==== 1000 ” Maybe I don't play Rocket Battery And well, just do what you think is good. I'll don't give my opinion in the future.

  • ID General Chat

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from WarX: “I think if you want to fill limit on small arms troops, then GT are not the way to go Also FoI 10 is way not enough restrictive. DH can't field 4 strong artillery pieces, neither 3 + Engineer (strong means: not Flame/Bolt Thrower) and we pay uncomparable price for our artillery (in terms of restriction of other options in army). ” If you think that Flame thrower and Balista are not strong war machine, wich is a bit wrong for me, why do we pay 2 FOI for flame and 1 FOI for Balis…

  • ID General Chat

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from WarX: “@Elpeji With all the respect... You complain that DH which deployed 900pts in Engines of War had stronger artillery then you? Your investment was 700 which more then half of them was chassis of Kadim Titan! I think comparing artillery in ID vs. DH matchup has no sense as DH doesn't expose it's biggest weakness against ID and ID can't benefit from maximum advantage neither. ps. Why Naptha on Titan and RB on GT, not opposite? ” I just say that we have the same power but a big dif…

  • ID General Chat

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Well well well, Come back after my first game with my new list : (Hidden Content) Against an DH list : (Hidden Content) Finally, I win after some unlucky dices, so my two words about my list : The prophet of Ashuruk is good. New pyro attribute is very good. but this is not new. Conjurer is good too because he comes with Witchcraft Vizier is a classic solid BSB. The new weapon enchantment is cool. 45pts is balance for the shooting phase, not sure for the melee rule. I prefer -10pts for just the s…

  • ID General Chat

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from strauss: “I am also very curious to read your feedback about the enforcers ” I play 20 Tauruk Blunder PW before this patch, and they are good so now ... They are better

  • ID General Chat

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    I'll try something like that for 2 games this week : 490 - Prophet, General, Prophet of Ashuruk, Wizard Master, Pyromancy, Talisman of the Void 270 - Vassal Conjurer, Wizard Adept, Witchcraft, Book of Arcane Mastery 220 - Vizier, Battle Standard Bearer, Flintlock Axe (Eye of the Bull) 424 - 22 Infernal Warriors, Shield, Blunderbuss, Musician 375 - 40 Vassal Levies, Spear and Shield, Musician, Standard Bearer (Their Master's Banner), Vassal Chieftain 365 - 15 Citadel Guard, Flintlock Axe, Musicia…

  • ID General Chat

    Elpeji - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Concerning Tauruks. There is a problem between GW and IW/Shield price. Maybe with Parry it will be better but at this moment, 7pts is a big deal between this 2 options.