Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 227.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • I think it does. If in the Middle Ages a flipping monster out of steels rolls on my way I’d be scared af!!

  • Maybe spend a tad more complexity budget on the bell!

  • Quote from skipschnit: “Quote from Eisenhans: “Quote from arwaker: “Quote from setrius: “As more I think about the rule of Lightning Attacks less I like it. This is a completely random rule where you and your opponent can't planify a strategy and all depends of the luck. To be honnest I dont like win or lost games thanks to random rules like this. That is all ” Hm, I like this level of randomness a lot. ” And I absolutely adore it!Dicemolesting someone who relies only on statistics at a tourname…

  • Quote from arwaker: “I will check some Necron guns whether they would make a good Mauss gun I like the designs of those two VS artillery pieces. Pure, clean, random. I would call it close to perfection. ” Im very much with you this time!

  • Quote from arwaker: “Quote from noir: “? a bigger base is clearly a disadvantage. im not saying it it doesnt have some upsides (blocking los for example) but it definitely is less viable. if you guys would go for a bigger base you should calc that in while pricing. ” You are talking about initial price, which is rather irrelevant. But the final price is anyway community decision by choosing or rejecting the model in their individual lists. ” Just to be clear: I’m not scared of a bigger base exce…

  • Quote from skipschnit: “I’m really curious and interested that many of you are associating base size with performance and/or stats. That is really playing into the psychy stereotype of males and size. A former RT guy once explained to me that regardless of stats, a bigger base is worth more due to the other interactions it has within the game. ” ? a bigger base is clearly a disadvantage. im not saying it it doesnt have some upsides (blocking los for example) but it definitely is less viable. if …

  • Quote from Kahlek166: “Got three models for them, the forge world one on 50x100, the new gw one on 75x50 and the very old one base less until the lab drops (maybe 50x50 or 40x40) so everything is possible Only a complete new thing would be absolutely bad ” haha yeah. Rebasing wouldn't be the nicest thing for me as well. hence i opted for 75x50 and the other way round. However imo one could go bigger if necessary. just smaller would be a problem in regards to current models used.

  • Quote from Mitou: “Arrived after a break on the forum. Checked the 3 last posts. I am leaving VS now. ” If you could - instead of threatening shelving - try to communicate positively what problems you see, you might help having a better book at the end. You then even might not have to shelve your army and you will maybe even have lots of fun playing.

  • Quote from Hombre de Mundo: “Quote from Eldan: “Meh. Making the bell a musician is a nice idea, but otherwise, it's a bit... boring. No cool sonic effect on the bell, no building up momentum by ringing it in, no poison fog, no giant spiky ball of doom, no way for platforms to implode or backfire... ” I'm a bit of the same opinion. I appreciate merging the two and nerfing the pendulum in particular but this new iteration lacks oomph. And oomph does not necessarily mean buff, but rather something …

  • Interesting! Does this one replace the rakachit machinist?

  • Quote from Peacemaker: “Quote from DemonLordDave: “You seriously think that in a book where model count is being increased that 2 entries currently at 20-50 models will go down to 15-30? ” Yep. This is because the slave/arm units will be like 30+ or whatever.And remember, I said to make them more elite as well which would cap their max size to like 30-35. If these elite units can be big units of 50 then why take the weaker horde units? But I guess realistically min size 20 is what it should be. …

  • Haha i think 40 points for an Abom is highly unlikely so you won’t have to sell your army. But I do see that critically too. I mean obv we all collected VS eventhough we knew we get a Horde army. But I must say i am a bit afraid of the models I would need to buy (eventhough I’ve got a pretty big collection already) and the stuff I’d need to paint. That said, as a little disclaimer, I have absolutely no idea what the Not spoilered designs look like and if that trend continues. But I hope the team…

  • Quote from Wes456123: “Quote from arwaker: “I think spell duplication is a real problem. Having 3 times wrath of God on expenible wizards each might be fun to pull off, but I think being on the receiving end is the opposite of fun. ” I'm not sure that having multiple spells is all that much of a problem. They're only going to be able to cast one of those 3 Wrath of Gods per turn, and if the Vermin priests start dying to miscasts when they do try and cast it... oh well? You've just killed one of …

  • Quote from ValourUnbound: “Quote from Jon: “Love the design! Does this mean theres no normal master lvl wizard in the book? ” Yes. ” i mean I get that the overall goal seems to be a cheap army with quantity over quality but I would definetely want some potent characters that don’t solely rely on just mass... it just feels less epic; it’s like here’s my super cool general. He’s the same guy as the 3 other guys I play. Except that he’s my general.

  • The Company of the Blazing Dawn

    noir - - User Blogs

    Post

    Quote from Baranovich: “Quote from Mad 'At: “Not an update, but a teaser for what I'm working on atm: bM8gFCE.jpg Any guesses? ” Good lord, what the heck kind of digital camera do you own??? That's an insane level of zooming! If I tried that with my Android camera I'd get a black and white blur. Oh, my guess is an Ogre with a musekt? ” It must be an iPhone then! :p

  • DE General Discussion

    noir - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    Quote from Cam: “Quote from ferda: “I guess AP 1 in short range could be viable, for one extra point. Has this concept been tried out in play testing? Doesnt look to OP to me. ” It was tried in PT. AP0 3 shots at short range was deemed to good (and has been again in alpha). 2 shots AP1 was deemed ok. 2 shots AP0 is new I believe so let’s try it out. An increase and AP1 is probs where they’ll end up, it’s still alpha. But it’ll involved a cost increase. Quote from noir: “heyhey not so fast! prett…

  • DE General Discussion

    noir - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    Quote from Glegut: “@noir Ok but still suppressive fire dosen't work for Dark/Shadow raiders and when you compare this unit for previously version or old xbows you understand why this weapon are weak. 3 shots with ap0 is ok because you increse statistic chance to get some wounds even versus 1+ armor saves oponents unit. 2 shots with ap0 is not ok because you absolutely decrease statistic chance to get some wounds versus 1+ saves oponents unit. Simple? I think so- yes Regards ” still shadow rider…

  • DE General Discussion

    noir - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    Quote from MountainBuns: “@noir could you change that teal to green please? My eyes were burning trying to read the bonuses and we want to make those as clear as day ” just for you my love

  • Quote from Nemeroth: “Tale of slow painters done. I present Dreaded Lady Giant! the-ninth-age.com/community/ga…ee5bd4498407a58a1845246ef the-ninth-age.com/community/ga…ee5bd4498407a58a1845246ef ” magnificent paintjob!

  • DE General Discussion

    noir - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    Quote from Glegut: “@Kriegschmidt You have right but: 1) if you are volunteer or not you still have some job to do, right? If don't want listen players so maybe it's time to say goodbe. 2) yes, this nerfs really disappoint me and many DE players. 3) ofcourse I will be waiting for the final book but changed like that push me back to my second army and I dont want to test something like this new xbows rules. As I said many post ago, if DE lab steal something they must give something. No more, no l…