Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 194.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • It makes much sense that it is safe. The process has already existed for quite some time and there are a lot of reasons to believe that balance is as good as it has ever been. I believe that most armies are within 5% of an ideal 50% win rate. And balance changes on the scale of 5 to 10% may have more impact than you realise. Do you play online video games? From my experience, developpers of competitive games make balance changes of similar magnitude. The process is not especially safe because of…

  • Prety much what I said, yes, except Data analysis doesn't exist anymore and is now Tournament Analysis. I want to stress that taking the number of entries in a category is not a meaningfull way to set a goal of internal balance, even though doing so can't give results that are way too far of an ideal goal. The SE core is a perfect example. There are 4 units, from which you deduce that each should have 25% share. But suppose that in the next update, for clarity (Layout, RCT), Heath Riders and Hea…

  • I'm not sure I see your points either. I've not spoken about how large or small balance changes should be, only about targeted play share. Of course a 5% change won't drastically change lists, but it will shift what is most optimal to play. Never pretended the opposite Quote from arwaker: “If army XYZ has 4 core units availible, the DA (data analysis team) goal is to bring them all to 25%. ” This is doubly (tiply, even) wrong. Tournament (not data) analysis team has no such goal. It's goal is to…

  • Well you said 5-10% so even with that interpretation it's 55/60% And this is very personal of course, but I wouldn't bat an eye if a quarter of SE lists in tournaments had no sylvan Archers at all.

  • Sylvan Archers are the most typical and iconic unit in the book, and the main core unit. I don't think having them played in 50% of lists is a bad thing, and I may even say that anything under that would seems to me like they're underused.

  • Reqlly really nice! The paint is super clean.

  • Quote from Little Joe: “Quote from Serwyn: “Looks quite nice. I might go for some pathfinders. Did someone already order from them and could say about the resin and print quality? ” It's a kickstarter to find out. I do think there are already licenced print shops around. So some will be available already. The way I see it, this is future proofing that availability. ” I'm sorry, I really don't unserstand your message ^^' From what I understand these are not their first models, they are "3D Printi…

  • Looks quite nice. I might go for some pathfinders. Did someone already order from them and could say about the resin and print quality?

  • Christmas Avatars

    Serwyn - - WWW Topics

    Post

    Quote from Dain_II: “Quote from Mad 'At: “Another batch finished! First we have @Dain_II.Wanted to do something different than the standard Santa's hat, so went with the overall colour of the avatar and turned him into a gingerbread man instead. Before: LorXidP.jpg And after: RYcq3Xz.jpg ” Watcha @Mad 'At. I love it! But how long before this takes effect? ” You need to change the avatar yourself in your profile

  • Christmas Avatars

    Serwyn - - WWW Topics

    Post

    Quote from Mad 'At: “Finished up three more. @Casas before: eCoOe05.jpg And after: AAs2fEM.jpg Simple, but I'm happy with it, I tried to keep the feel of the image. Next is @Jomppexx before: yMGwv6L.png And after: SsVouaG.png I wouldn't want to be on the receiving end of that cane... And finally @Serwyn before: alC5SdO.png And after: vfUREmM.png These icon avatars are always tricky, and I think I need to figure out more things to do with them. The rest will have to wait until tomorrow ” Ooooh yo…

  • Christmas Avatars

    Serwyn - - WWW Topics

    Post

    These are so nice Oh please please @Mad 'At could you..?

  • @Tyranno There is the Forge World Thranduil: 01-01.jpg Resin as well though.

  • It seems natural that having only so a few scoring units while scoring is necessary means these units are heavily played. It also seems that these units are played more than what player would want. Hence there are two possible solutions : Tune the army around playing less scorers (possibly nerfing these scoring units, in favour of other units) or increasing the diversity of the scorer option (not on the table for this update, removing some light troops). Given that the second possibility is not …

  • What SE currently lacks

    Serwyn - - Sylvan Elves (SE)

    Post

    Quote from Bogi: “Quote from Falco: “Talking about our wood friends: Are TB and treeman a little bit expensive for that atributes? Compared with another monsters or monstruos infantery... Appart from everyone with pyro banners or able to take alchemy... TB are 20 points more expensive than one year ago ” I guess that's the way things go, units which are commonly used get point increases regardless of external balance. TB have great stats for their cost, probably the best in the game but are very…

  • What SE currently lacks

    Serwyn - - Sylvan Elves (SE)

    Post

    I mostly agree with DanT. The army would be probably more efficient, easier to balance and more satisfying with a bit less mobility on archers. I don't agree with QTF though. Imho it plays more into shooting efficiency than into avoidance. SA are un comparable to Sentinels in term of easyness to charge. On the other hand, among the 5 shooting units of the book (3 infantry and 2 cavalry), 4 of them have light troops. And that is the main avoidance offender. Being able to relocate freely within ma…

  • What SE currently lacks

    Serwyn - - Sylvan Elves (SE)

    Post

    Quote from WhammeWhamme: “No. Those are not valid things to say in regards to the slim book either. The slim book is not being designed or redesigned. If you want to talk about "design", you're talking about either the LAB, or history (and you can't change the past). ” Please link me to the place where intended play rate of all unit in the book has been defined and set in stone, with the information that balance update won't change it. Otherwise your point is entirely void. Hint: You can't becau…

  • What SE currently lacks

    Serwyn - - Sylvan Elves (SE)

    Post

    Quote from Bogi: “Could this then apply to, for example, all rank and file troops in the game? ” Well, I think it is a valid design suggestion and something that is compatible with the design and balance processes, to the best of my knowledge. (I think DanT proposed something along this lines as well?) But I'm just saying that it make sense to discuss arround it. I don't know if that something RT would be up to or if it is in the scope of the balance update, and maybe there would be a lot of uni…

  • What SE currently lacks

    Serwyn - - Sylvan Elves (SE)

    Post

    Quote from DanT: “Quote from Serwyn: “Again the community is asked a direct input in the form of "which units are most underplayed" and "which units are most overplayed". Omitting some details, this pretty directly means "which unit are too cost efficient" and "which unit are not cost efficient enough". Especially sincre the update won't change anything but points. So why wouldn't it be reasonable for the community to discuss and argue which feedback is the good one? For example someone may find…

  • What SE currently lacks

    Serwyn - - Sylvan Elves (SE)

    Post

    To everyone else reading: I insist and repeat yet another time just to be clear. Don't say "SE Archers cost more than HE archers that is a scandal why does the project hate SE". That's very bad. Bouh.