Search Results

Search results 1-3 of 3.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • Quote from Davian: “You mean like a rule saying ”if knights and peasants fights in the same combat, no CR is generated by the opponent for wounds inflicted on peasants” ? or more like ”Knights never suffer negative modifiers to their leadership because of dead peasants” some kind of upgraded insignificant rule? ” At the time of writing it I was imagining something like the first example. It would be an insane rule, and it would most likely never happen. But I feel we need some way use Levy as le…

  • I believe the problem with peasant levy right now is that they have one role right now which they can reasonably do on the tabletop, a sacrificial tarpit. And to even do this job they need to have support from a character or a units of KotoR or better knight unit. Even then I'd argue that peasant crusaders (with reliquary support) are better at this for a similar price. The ideal scenario that many imagine with peasant levy, working together with a unit of knights to provide static cr and to hel…

  • So, the way I think about the rubber lance syndrome is that it's not necessarily that KoE has bad offensive output, it's that is really concentrated on the the turn you charge. Sure, other armies have units which can whiff on the charge, but one of our core themes is charging knights, and lets face it, that's why most of us got into this army in the first place. And yes, while we do have tools to mitigate a round of bad luck, they are concentrated in the magic phase which forces us to commit to …