Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 1,000. There are more results available, please enhance your search parameters.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • @Norn could you tell me what your changes are? i see that you have shared with us a home-made rulebook with new rules and point values highlighted in yellow, but it is a lot of data. i would prefer you to tell me your changes as i am already writing down all your suggestions for the survey.

  • VS LAB Alpha Discussions

    xaby86 - - The Vermin Swarm (VS)

    Post

    Well, you just have to place them in such a way that if panic or terror occurs, the grenadiers go in the direction of the bubble. Basically, I would write it like this: "We are safe: A unit with this rule that is fleeing because of a failed panic or terror check, and passes its Rally Test in its next Player Turn within Rally around the Flag or Comanding Presence range it does not become Shaken." There may even be a few more units that have this rule.

  • VS LAB Alpha Discussions

    xaby86 - - The Vermin Swarm (VS)

    Post

    What if the grenadiers had a rule that would give them something resembling feigned flight if they were grouped in the Aquila banner rank or the General's Bubble? That would also be useful when fleeing panic or terror, not just when voluntarily fleeing a charge.

  • What if you leave Callous as it is but all units that fire into combat gain +1Aim? It's a boost to shooting on the condition of killing own models. From the point of view of the background, you can say that the easier to hit a larger group of people. Plus it's more evil "Mmmmm I could shoot that monster at 4+ or I could charge him with slaves and shoot him at 3+ at the cost of them dying half.... Well, I don't care, I don't care if they all die!"

  • Folks, replying to @Dr. Geezer but it's really for everyone. It's 3 precise changes, not 3 broad generic changes, i.e. it's no good to say: 1) make all infantry cheaper 2) make all WM cheaper 3) make all runes cheaper This is not how it works. It's not the rules we've been given. I'm all for you, but if I want to get changes for the DH community, I have to abide by the rules we have been given and if you want us to consider your proposals for a vote, they must also be in the form we are asking f…

  • Quote from Omarcomin: “Las limitaciones son inútiles para levantar sin reducciones significativas de puntos. ” Yes, that is true, but I expect that there will be changes to points proposed by RT, we can also negotiate, present data, etc to try to reduce prices, however, the limitations can only be changed by this survey. That's why I would like to see some limitations changed.

  • Well, if it's OK with you, we will close the period for proposals on the 28th. After that, we will prepare a poll with all the changes that comply with the rules, which will end on 11 November approximately. Spread this thread among your friends and anyone interested so that they can propose in time. Although I hope that the new year will bring significant discounts, I would not want all your votes to be focused on points, although I agree that it would be the most impactful and necessary for DH…

  • ID General Chat

    xaby86 - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    I quite like this version but I expected something more... impressive for the immortals and especially the Overlord, I expected much more.

  • Quote from Sodder: “From the new ID version: Quote: “Seat of Authority: Cannot be Stomped and HP C ↗ 4 ” Must ours be the only one getting stomped? ” On that, from what I seem to recall, there has been a consensus that all such models will be Cannot be stomped as a generic thing. Maybe we don't have it yet, I don't know, but when our LAB shift comes, at the latest, I think we will have it.

  • Reminder: this is not a wish list. We CANNOT give new rules to units. We CAN lower points, modify limits (0-1, Only X character) try to modify some equipment options. Keep this in mind when making suggestions, we will not put impossible options up for vote.

  • Quote from Omarcomin: “1. Roll back msu nerfs 2. personal apology Edited by mod ” I want my retirement pension

  • Quote from Davian: “I believe this easy access to get aegis discussion is mainly theoretical. I believe re-rolls etc are more important than aegis for their role on the table. I think most QK will choose a stronger target than chaff units. ” For me that's obvious and out of debate, most of the time Lettal strike and reroll will be better than +1 Aegis. The question is whether it is consistent to receive the goddess reward if the QK unit has not contributed to it at all. The marked unit could die…

  • Quote from Klexe: “Quote from xaby86: “As I said, I like them a lot. Two questions: 1) what happens if the marked unit is eliminated by another unit or flees the battlefield? 2) Wouldn't it be more interesting if the marked unit was chosen by the opponent? To limit it a bit, I would make it so that the enemy must mark a unit that is either Scoring or Beast or Large or Gigantic. With that, you get rid of most Chaff or WM units. If the Questing is doing a mission and they are tough, it's best if t…

  • As I said, I like them a lot. Two questions: 1) what happens if the marked unit is eliminated by another unit or flees the battlefield? 2) Wouldn't it be more interesting if the marked unit was chosen by the opponent? To limit it a bit, I would make it so that the enemy must mark a unit that is either Scoring or Beast or Large or Gigantic. With that, you get rid of most Chaff or WM units. If the Questing is doing a mission and they are tough, it's best if the mission is large and dangerous.

  • Quote from Klexe: “Quote from xaby86: “@Klexe Impeccable design, everything is beautiful in this design. Now I understand why it is the favourite unit of many PTs. ” you mean the questing knights? ” Yes, I posted here because I thought people would comment here, but given the obvious lack of comments, I think people must be talking in another thread. I'll go look for people's reactions, I'm curious.

  • @Klexe Impeccable design, everything is beautiful in this design. Now I understand why it is the favourite unit of many PTs.

  • VS LAB Alpha Discussions

    xaby86 - - The Vermin Swarm (VS)

    Post

    To make priests cheaper, which could be a problem as they could be abused as chaff, why not reduce the Dis, to 4 for example, and give the holy platform Dis C+2? Maybe putting priests at 95/100pts and making the holy triumvirate more restrictive, like in the beginning, would be better. That way you have cheap priests who are more cowardly than the common troop (actually looks good, as they don't seem to have military training) and are the worst choice of characters to use as chaff but if they ge…

  • Coincido en todo lo que dice @BARKER pero a mí la R2 y que tengan peor perfil de combate peor me gusta. Creo que la próxima actualización debería centrarse en los equipos de armas experimentales, la artillería, junto con las reglas que les incumben y el H. Los Fettis Brutes los veo un poco brutos (como su nombre indica). Los Discípulos necesitan un pequeño extra de amor. En general VS me gusta bastante, aunque como todo Alpha, aún cambiarán cosas, de eso estad seguros.

  • Pirate Kings guard

    xaby86 - - Dwarven Holds (DH)

    Post

    Where is the anvil? Haven't you built it yet?

  • Well, then either the translator hasn't found a word appropriate to my language or we don't have an equivalent. According to the words suggested, these are the definitions and they don't fit the effect of the rule at all. Tolerance: 1. attitude of a person who respects other people's opinions, ideas or attitudes even if they do not coincide with one's own. 2. The ability of an organism to resist and accept the intake of certain substances, especially food or medicine. Indulgence: 1. Attitude or …