Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 191.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • Quote from Krarks: “I dont build my lists around facing certain opponents, though I do agree that Naptha Throwers would be decent against OK. Neither do I. My point was just that they're particularly good against OK. But they're also good against most other armies. Same as many other options you put in your list. They need to do something for your army and they will always be better or worse against some foes than others. And at the point you're having the unit + Gunnery Team + a Character.. wel…

  • Quote from rbf911: “Quote from rzmoz: “…when you explain the S5D3wounds on CC and rerolls if there's tokens after that ” What does the CC refer to in the above comment? Thanks ” hmm. Should say short range. Not sure what CC means either I assume auto correct.

  • Quote from Krarks: “So since I've been one of the people who did not like the Gunnery Teams on paper, I did force myself to play them to actually try them out. ” Hi, I feel I'm one of the few that thinks gunnery teams with naptha are close to auto-include and I'm facing ogres on a regular basis (my list building is very meta specific as I never face all 16 factions. Closer to 5-6) I suggest you try them, especially if you play against ogres again. If not for anything else than seeing your oppone…

  • Infernal Dwarves LAB FAQ

    rzmoz - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Will flaming standard affect the crush attack of the bastion if enabled in CC? For example, you have a unit with IWs with a flaming standard and a bastion joined to the unit. It enters CC and the flaming standard is activated. Will the crush attack become flaming? As I read it, no. But there's been a lot of talk about how the old volcanic embrace could affect breath of corruption breath attack. But I assume this was only when used as shooting and not as special attack in CC?

  • My Army: ID Opponents Army: OK Score: 19-1 MVP: CG w pistols, gunnery team and prophet + enforcers LVP: annointed w IW My Army: ID Opponents Army: SE Score: 9-11 MVP: enforcers, commissioner LVP: IWs w BBs and bastion

  • Quote from WhammeWhamme: “Can someone who wants Flintlocks to be cheaper post battle report for a game where they ran Citadel Guard without Flintlocks, either in the current or immediately previous rules iteration? ” I don't have a strong opinion about the price of Flintlocks (but I would always like my options to be cheaper But I played a single day micro tournament yesterday with 3 participants: ID;SE;OK We don't win by most VPs but winner takes all. ID list (Hidden Content) OK list (Hidden Co…

  • Thank you @WhammeWhamme. I think I understand it now. This thread is mainly about community feedback for an upcoming balance "update". As opposed to getting some final adjustments in for the entire gold lifetime. Whatever is accepted by whoever decides can all and may be changed in subsequent patches in whatever form they take (hotfixes, annual balancing etc). In other words, these requests are mainly input for setting the starting point of gold because nothing that would be granted is out of sc…

  • Quote from Villon: “Until now seems that we are arriving at some agreement in wich 3 are the main concerns for us. 1. Points decrease for Lugars (with 7 votes) 2. Points decrease for Flintlocks (with 5 votes) 3. Points decrease for Overlord (with 5 votes) other options with more than 1 vote Increase Instruments of Destructions to 30% Increase Kadim Incarnates Max unit to 8 Points decrease Gunnery Team Points increase Seat of Authority maybe if you voted for something else, do you want to join on…

  • - Naptha Thrower: max 3/army - Kadim Incarnates: max 8/unit - Shackled Slaves: max 50/unit

  • Quote from Villon: “1. Fluffs - Things that are not a buff or nerf, but more a kind of fun change. ” Could you or someone else give an example of a fluff request that was acceptable? I asked for a change in unit name which was deemed out of scope. I also assume that background changes are out of scope.

  • Quote from Krarks: “As all of them are rule changes: No, not a single one. ” Rats. Back to the thinking box.

  • - Citadel Guards pistols get one better aim. So pistols (3+) and spear. - Flame of the east. Volcanic Embrace get clipped wings. So volcanic Embrace (D3, clipped wings) - Gunnery Team get one better armour. So Arm 1. Are these requests within what is asked for?

  • Ah. There it was. Thank you. I thought so.

  • Let's say I have a character (ID Vizier for example) where I purchase a spear as weapon. 1. Does he loose his hand weapon then? I would assume no. 2. If no, can I purchase two weapon enchantments (1 for spear + 1 for h.weapon) and select weapon at the start of combat?

  • Quote from WhammeWhamme: “Snippets, there might be a future version with snippets, it's a pet project of my mine to try and get 'er done, but it's not within the scope of this thread. ” I hope it will be done at some point. It really adds to the overall feeling when reading the slim books. I will think of other request.

  • I have two requests (one of them may be multiple in one. Not sure). Both are fluff. - walking volcano and earthquake names become more immersive / more infernal sounding. Maybe just translated? - small snippets of text for each entry like in the HG book. Doesn't have to be new text. Could "just" be from the full AB background stories

  • ID General Chat

    rzmoz - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from WhammeWhamme: “Honestly, I'm not even sure what I'd suggest it be changed to based on that. I don't really understand your issue - to me, "Walking Volcano" conjures up something like Te Kā and, well... that's pretty darn otherwordly and supernal to me. Yes. Something like that. Just some of the names written in infernal maybe? And "Infernal sounding"... again, not really sure what you mean. An Abzhagevish (the conlang "Kadim" comes from) word? Something about demons and hell (nope)? N…

  • ID General Chat

    rzmoz - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from WhammeWhamme: “Names are less likely to change than rules. If it isn't brand new to the update, you've basically missed your window. Still, might as well tell me what your issues are right this g-darn second because every passing second makes it less likely to happen. ” If I could wish for one thing, it'd be that the Kadim Titan options became more otherworldly / infernal / supernal sounding. (Volcano / Earthquake) If I could wish for two things, the second thing would be higher calib…

  • ID General Chat

    rzmoz - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from Tyranno: “Echoing what Strauss said. The rules design part of the update is done. We don't need any more rules ideas, because they can't be implemented. Not that people should be 100% complacent. As there should be a last little correction update afterwards, to fix spelling mistakes or unintended effects. So do keep an eye out for those and report them if you find them. ” What about changes to naming? Where does that fall under? I ask since it has no mechanical impact but is not reall…

  • ID General Chat

    rzmoz - - Infernal Dwarves (ID)

    Post

    Quote from Letsfets: “I think, changing the rules of the IDs again and again will lead to a nether ending story of the ID-betas. For my suggestions, this would only change the ritual rules and not touch anything else as the name change was just to make it broader applicable wo changing the rules. I would suggest to try to keep the most rules, as they are and concentrate on the point adjustments. Just as an example: Lets assume the ritual for the overlord costs 10p instead of 120p... oh wow, sud…