Search Results

Search results 1-16 of 16.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • Well, quite better balance patch than the first one, necesary return to 75 points to hunter's honour, and generally low prices for all units. But don forget that the Treefather is still more expensive than last year. Honestly, I do not think we will leave low tier, that is very difficult and it does not patch with a decrease point for units. But hey, today we are better than yesterday, so it is OK, we will test lists and games with this changes

  • @Giladis broke my heart with the whole thing of the Orion model and "the King of the forests" . No grudges So, here I come to bring a new idea. I use this unit as Thicket Beasts. What do you think? It is not finshed yet, some details remain (like the standard, sorry for that ugly post-it hahaha). It is not the best photo, I know, but I can't take one better right now . Also, as you can see, when I thought and assembled this unit, I hoped that someday there would be command group option to Sylvan…

  • Quote from Giladis: “The SE LAB includes a visual for the King of the Woods and Orion model by GW isn't fitting for it. ” It is very sad to hear that . I will wait to see it, but I do not understand why discard it completly. I hope that when LAB comes out, I really keep my feeling of belonging towards this army, and not feel like something completely different.

  • Quote from Giladis: “Quote from Sequias: “That said, it would be awesome to see them (or inspired by) in the LAB as two new entries, as "King fo the Woods" and "Queen of the Woods". That would give personality to the army. ” While the Project is working on ways how to introduce Legendary Characters I can assure you we will not be introducing Gods within the setting as playable pieces in the game. It is far more likely GW's Orion model could find suitable usage in the potential diversification of…

  • Quote from Giladis: “@Sequias my notification tab shows me I have been tagged by you in this topic yesterday but when I click the link it leads to nowhere ” Yeah, I tried to argue that DE had light troop mount with Pegasus, but once I posted, I saw that it was large size and not standard one, so my argument fall down inmediatly . My bad and my apologies

  • Quote from Alexwellace: “I use my Orion as a stag prince very happily. The stag prince is one of the top...5....non gigantic single models in the game in terms of damage output. I think he's a worthy legacy for Orion. I do wish he'd be 30pts cheaper though. ” Yeah, I also use my Orion model for a Wild Hunter Forest Prince on Great Elk (R5), "Titanic Might", "Destiny Call/Talisman fo Shielding" and "Horn fo the Wild Hunt", and there you have. The big bow is the only item is missing . It is a very…

  • Those are minor things, that would not change almost anything. But they are a very very good example to show how bad is the slim book of the SE designed. There are other ones more important, but they have never been resolved. So, the result is all this years being an army less competitive in general terms than other ones, with no real intention to solve it. Sad

  • Quote from LetargicHunter: “And additionally, if alone Pathfinder Prince can not march and shoot. ” Awesome design...

  • Quote from Alexwellace: “If I was on the LAB team, I'd potentially save these for a tree spirits shaped supplement. So basic thicket beasts are available to a normal Sylvan Army, but the Sylvan Spirit supplement would have access to Grove Guardians, which would be elite thickets with weapon options. Maybe slightly lower resilience as well. Res 4, similar to Shabti and Minotaurs. ” Well... now I disagree because SE have few diferent units compared to other armies, so I would not like to see optio…

  • I would like to say to LAB team, when it begins to work in the book, to be fearless and get inspired by some Age of Sigmar models, if they fit well. SE need some new units and options to the army. For example, I do not know if it has been said, but, weapon options for Treekin would be awesome: 99120204018_KurnothHunters03.jpg 99120204018_KurnothHunters01.jpg99120204018_KurnothHunters02.jpg

  • Edit: I was mistaken in what I posted, sorry for that.

  • T9A does not have the OP destructive spells that had the 8th edition of warhammer that caused terror of mounted light troops for wizards protected in bunkers. I think the panic to repeat that situation caused removing this option, but perhaps, with the magic like it is in T9A, and specially the paths for the druids, mostly focussed in support, it is no longer necesary to having so much fear to give the druids this option. There are lot of things that can be tried if you want to mitigate the impa…

  • Quote from Wesser: “ No, while I get that why the game dont want Briar Maiden bunkers I gotta agree Druid Horse and Unicorn arent worth playing and would be overcosted even if they were free. Its something to keep in mind for LAB. Can we design Druid mounts that limit Druid Avoidance and actually leaves Them options for joining units ” Totally

  • Yeah, we mostly feel that way in some kind. The things in what SE historicaly excel where nerfed or removed due to the opponent not being bored or frustrated. But hey, what it is boring or frustrating for SE to play against, that does not matter. Then, SE are in a nobody place, they do not excels in almost nothing, so the result is years of being low tier, feeling as a marginated army as always SE have been. Look that most armies have new units in the Slim 9th Age book compared to 8th Warhammer …

  • There are many little things that reflect all this feeling of being somewhat marginalized. Por example, I still do not know why units with no full comand group options like Ghouls have Swift reform due its champion (for free), but units of Sylvan Spirit do not, insted for 20 points only on a character "aspect of nature" that furthermore is limited to one, so that character can't take another. You can argue "well, in old 8th edition neither them did not have command group option", but then, why o…

  • Hello there. SE players have always felt as a second or third category in GW editions against other armies. Their army books have been always the lasts ones, and had editions with no books, having to play with old books, fewer new units or options than other armies, etc... Then, fewer players play this army because it has less love than other, and then the wheel never ends. Like the uroboros. We thought that would be something that could change in T9A, but it is not happening. Obviusly the actua…