Search Results

In preparation for the LAB im looking for thyroscutus models. I have a good 2nd hand deal in the works for the GW bastiladons but since we are most likely be able to field them next to each other im wondering if they "rank" up. Disregarding the tail, can you fit those models on a 50x100 bases next to each other with the overlap to the sides ? Or do you have to help a bit with height differences from the base ?

I like it because it should be cheaper than the current one, which means more dinos !

I think polls are a bad way of trying to get an overall pattern of opinions. Id rather have a separate thread with an made up example and have users post the changes they would make to it and have them explain why they would prefer the changes.

moooaaaarrr ! Great colors, blends and also love the base !

Too bad those are not available as stl files.

Quote from Tobi_Tobsen: “minimum size of 20 comes to my mind first. ” Same here, but i think its a good move. Quote from berti: “Did I miss something or why is there no musician option available? ” ASWR01 should be at least 1) Swift Reform and maybe March to the Beat and 2) old cold-blooded , if i had to guess. Ive got nothing to complain about this weeks spoiler. Totally fine core unit.

Quote from Ghiznuk: “It’s pronounced the same as in Japanese : ポウアカイ ” Ahh ... now everything makes sense ! #teampouakai

Quote from Marcema: “Quote from Doug_L: “How is it supposed to be pronounced? Pook-ay was my assumption? ” I pronounce it Poo-Wa-Kai ” This is how i would pronounce it : ttsmp3.com/ -> German / Hans -> puah kai or puahkai (serperated sounds better imo) -> read

What a horrible name ! Pouakai is enough, Sky Tyrant could be very well scrapped imo . Depending on the points, it could be a decent mount for the new skink chiefs with mithril / hero´s heart. I don´t see a reason for this combaty mount to be used for priests unless for coatl models. Another thing is that there are now 3 flying mounts if pteradon and rhamphodon mounts are still in the new book, which feels a bit too much. On High Altitude, cool rule which could be highly frustration to play agai…

Quote from Gingersmali: “Quote from arwaker: “We need to make sure that Goblins will feel very different than Vermin. ” Feel different, sure, very feel very different I’m not so sure, they should be nearest neighbours (If there something goblins should feel most similar too it would be VS imo). ” Life is Cheap Green When calculating Combat Score, halve the number of Health Point losses of models with Life is Cheap Green, rounding fractions up. This does not include Combat Score bonuses from Over…

Fears : - having the current/new orc/goblin types limiting the ability to add new units to the book - too much random randomness (3d6 instead of 2d6 maxed / 2d6 instead of 1d6+3 etc ... ) - rules bloat Hopes : - new units ( more elite orcs, large orc cav., wacky new goblin units etc ... ) - warcriess, battlecries - horde style with working discipline

@Ry S great looking skinks ! Where did you get those bows from ? I have been looking for new skink bow conversions, yet i only managed to find some with 6th Edition Nightgoblin Bows which seem too thick for them. The bow you used look much more fitting! They still look a tiny bit too long , but the thickness looks great for skinks.

It looks like it is gone from the engine of the ancients , could still be around on skink casters or the stygiosaur. For the "new" devices : A - replacement for the alch-engine shooting mode looks decent B - Great ! Combining hatred/poison frees up the standard enchantment on skinks and fixes the priest in cc liability. Curious on what happens to the skink hero blender , as hatred/posion is not limited to r&f models ... if not used in skink units it might be a very grindy option to poison off so…

After getting a working ignore/block user feature added to the forums or much harsher bans for trolling, id be willing to contribute the vocals.

Here we go again ...

Those "sala-stygiosaurus" look great! Are they printed at 100% ? Do you think that 120% would still fit on the 50x100 base ?

I would also prefer that the rework of the gargantula not being too heavily influenced by the spider chassis. Other than that I agree that the role should be a flanker with the focus on being good vs low armored infantry. I think that the spider shrine could become something like a "Engine of the Green Gods" 0-1 upgrade, which maybe could shift the preferred enemy from infantry to something else. Numbers and power of the unit, I´d like to see it being "crap" but numerous, so prefered in the 400 …

Holy wall of text, batman! With knowing the intent, connected to legacy rules, and after "distilling" this long rule paragraph, i think this is a great rule, very thematic and fitting for SA ( similar like how EoS Parent/Support is just EoS ). There is a lot of potential for army lists and hobby wise how this rule will affect the army on the table. How cool is a Thyroscutus in saurus warriors ? Or maybe weapon beasts in skinks ? Carno in raptors ? Coatl in terra/rhamps ? Looking forward to next …

The only change in the updated guidelines i would like to see is evo instead of thaumaturgy for orcs. Probably not going to happen, still should be mentioned.