Speaking strictly for myself, the reverse would be more apt...
I'm with Walter when it comes to FAB's:
TINS: No, without points adjustments, there is no 'strength' in ASAW. That's what a strength is, that's how the f%^&ing balance works.
t9A 'Vision': You have to give up your playstyles.
PRO: We thought you'd be getting a better army.
Community: It's not fair!
TINS: Fair!? Where's the basic logic, you bunch of crybabies.
ACS: Now cool it TINS, hey look everyone, there never was any 'strength' - t9A gave us a new book, go out an play it more man.
TINS: And, I would like my Hellcannon model back.
Other Subforums: Are these guys gonna hurt us, man?
TINS: No man, these guys are still struggling to get the full picture.
t9A 'Vision': OK, so, we takes your options and overcost your strengths - we calls it even.
TINS: Homebrew you!
ACS: No come on TINS, we're getting off light, man.
TINS: No, what's mine is mine.
t9A 'Vison': We updates da books, we takes the playstyles!
TINS: Come and get it...
t9A 'Vision': I update you, I update you.
ACS: Come on man, there's years to go.
TINS: ETC tuna-can playing inbreds with paper-printed terrain...
PS: Today's word of the day is 'satire' and the above lampooning is as much self-directed as it is at 'the man'.
Open Source INTERNAL BALANCE: HBE | DL 2.2 | WDG 2.2 | ID | SA | VC
The post was edited 1 time, last by There Is No Spoon ().