Has anyone tryed to play the same list just trading the might duke for a renown one?
Duke: General, Pegasus, Questing Oath & Bastard Sword, Shield, Crusader's Salvation, Virtue Of Renown, Blessed Inscriptions 600
Paladin: Bsb, Barded Warhorse, Questing Oath & Bastard Sword, Shield, Basalt Infusion 300
Damsel: Wizard Master, Barded Warhorse, Magical Heirloom, Druidism 430
12 Knights Aspirant: Standard, Musician, Banner Of The Last Charge 636
5 Knights Aspirant: 230
6 Knights Of The Realm: 260
2x Scorpion: 125
12 Knights Of The Quest: Standard, Musician, Champion 630
2x5 Yeoman Outriders: 125
3 Pegasus Knights: Skirmish 349
5 Pegasus Knights: Champion, Skirmish 565
I didn't find my matchups particularly bad with this list, and I I didn't lose a game at the event I took it too.
There is no might lord in my list: my alternative peg build has less raw power but more strategic options and less counterplay.
I think there is room to canvas the community and find out what is important to them about the lance formation.
(A) The aesthetic
(B) The specialness of getting their own formation
(C) The static combat resolution
(D) The steadfast breaking
(E) The narrow width
(F) etc etc
I personally believe that many of the current complaints about KoE cannot be easily solved with no changes to the current lance formation.
Which doesn't mean getting rid of it, just tweaking it in some way.
I have long held that a detailed community consultation about what are the important parts of the lance formation would be a very good idea before the LAB is started.
Of course, there is no possible change to the lance formation that will satisfy everyone and upset no-one... but as I say, I equally think there are elements of the current community who cannot be easily (if at all) satisfied if the lance formation has no changes.
Just my view of course
The post was edited 1 time, last by DanT ().