Hello Tiny. On the sticky thread about Ogres you have two votings going on. For the second one, could you please change "week" to "weak"? Thank you. By the way, if you guys need someone to read over the BRB or any work you have done to check for correct spelling then please let me know, as english is one of my two native languages. I am a spaniard on the Australian ETC team (Arthain knows me from Madrid). Cheers.

Hello Tiny,

two more guys for the Italian Translation Team : ELTHARIS and BUBONICUS. - Italian Team is complete for the moment :-))

Please remove Thread ELTHARIUS I create under Translation Internal: it is an ERROR ... intention was to create it under Italian Translation Team

Question: Is it possible to create new threads under the main Thread Italian Translation Team? I would like to have a different "channel" with each of the guys of the team it would be easier to follow their job.

The guys of the Italian translation Team are: ELTHARIS - BUBONICUS - HITSUGAYA TOUSHIRO - SHAIMAILAN

Hi Mister Moderator.

Magic revamp- Reducing overlap and duplication in WFB magic

Please delete this thread, I will re open it at a later time when I have a more finished product for review.

Edit: On second thought, could I get direct feedback on whether 9th age team is interested in my magic revamp proposal?
I know many people are unhappy about inconsistencies with various spells doing the same thing but have different costs.
I've also seen a few comments regarding a lack of need for all the lores/paths of magic.

But if the 9th age teams do already have their own direction they want to take it's okay. I will abandon what I have done.
I do not interact with any gaming group which uses any system other than 9th age, so that is not an option for me.

I have pinned that thread for revision, since it is a very interesting topic and I'd rather not remove it at the moment! I do agree with the general idea

Could a sub-forum under Dwarven Hold be created for list-building. We have increasing number of list-building threads, and I am afraid it could mask other discussions and make the hard to follow?

Thanks.

Hello Tiny,

I created a new sub-thread entitled "Re-naming feedback" in the "Large 9th Age Council" thread. Please, may you move this sub-thread into the "Feedback Report - Ogre Tribes" thread as a sub-sub-thread.

Thanks for your help

announcement error:

You said Beta 0.7 and 0.6 in your last anncoument

I've got a controversial topic that there is already an opinion against, but for public record I'd like
a moderator to to put up a sticky vote or strawpoll for people to playtest, evaluate, and vote on simultaneous turns.
I've prepared 2 solutions to the problems people have identified.

I personally play it and there are no obvious flaws other than the 2 I patched up.

Took out the swapping of active and reactive player so that players can't get an "effective" 2 sequential movements

The reduction of 2 combats to 1 per game turn has been fixed by a combat phase between charging phase and movement phase.

I've attached a template for a sticky

Understood, I will do it that way then.
Thanks.

I think it's better if someone from the rules team does it though.
It will show that the development team has an interest in it, and the community will be more receptive too.

Do you recommend anybody in particular?

tiny wrote:

Either create an appropriate thread in the suggestion section and simple ask to make it stick - this would then be a moderator request.

Or ask the rules team to consider and write such an thread - but this not an moderator request anymore.

Hi Tiny, I have a moderator request.

Please sticky this thread so that we can gather decent sample size feedback.

Public voting poll for changed turn system

Tiny, I have a moderator request. No this is not dejavu.

The poll I made, after discovering this site has a poll function is not lining up nicely and organisedly with the text.
Can you tell me, or fix it so that the text is under the poll, instead of beside it?

Public voting poll for changed turn system