Some rules may lead to strange / unintended scenarios if followed very literally (or may even include a mistake). By using common sense one can figure out, how an author intended a rule to work. Following this interpretation means you use the Rule As Intended.
Be aware that peoples opinion of how the rule was intended may differ. Ideally Erratas or FaQs will clarify such cases relatively fast.
The opposing concept is RAW. That approach is less subjective but sometimes leads to strange gameplay mechanics.
Be aware that peoples opinion of how the rule was intended may differ. Ideally Erratas or FaQs will clarify such cases relatively fast.
The opposing concept is RAW. That approach is less subjective but sometimes leads to strange gameplay mechanics.
1,995 times viewed